Displaying 126 - 150 of 262
Article
Martin, Luther H., Wiebe, Donald.
Why the possible is not impossible but is unlikely: a response to our colleagues. Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 63–72.
Article
Hödl, Hans Gerald.
Is an unbiased science of religion impossible?. Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 19–26.
Article
Kundt, Radek.
A scientific discipline: the persistence of a delusion?. Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 39–42.
Article
Zbíral, David.
Introduction to the discussion "Religious studies as a scientific discipline: a delusion?". Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 5–8.
Article
Mičaninová, Mária.
[Šedinová, Jiřina a kol. Dialog myšlenkových proudů středověkého judaismu: mezi integrací a izolací]. Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 127–128.
Article
Pokorny, Lukas.
[Madsen, Richard. Democracy's Dharma: religious renaissance and political development in Taiwan]. Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 142–144.
Article
Bubík, Tomáš.
Rethinking the relationship between the study of religions, theology and religious concerns : a response to some aspects of Wiebe's and Martin's paper. Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 43–53.
Article
Seiwert, Hubert.
The study of religion as a scientific discipline : a comment on Luther Martin and Donald Wiebe's paper. Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 27–38.
Article
Likavčan, Lukáš.
Nothing but the Truth (9.–11. 3. 2012, Vídeň). Pro-Fil. 2012, vol. 13, iss. 1, pp. .
Article
Klimeš, Jan.
Seeking the pattern of aesthetic value in a work of art. Pro-Fil. 2012, vol. 13, iss. 1, pp. 8–28.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Bibliography. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 104–108.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Czech theories of style. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 11–45.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Comparison of Czech and British theories of style. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 66–94.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Conclusions and possibilities for further research. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 95–103.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
British theories of style. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 46–65.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Acknowledgements. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 5.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Introduction. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 9–10.
Article
Martin, Luther H..
The future of the past : the history of religions and cognitive historiography. Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 155–171.
Article
McCorkle, William W,, Xygalatas, Dimitris.
Past, present, and future in the scientific study of religion : introduction. Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 149–154.
Article
Kováč, Milan.
Zomrel zakladateľ slovenskej religionistiky Ján Komorovský (2. jún 1924 až 20. marec 2012). Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 277–280.
Article
Wiebe, Donald.
It's never been better : comments on the current state of the science of religion. Religio. 2012, vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 173–192.
Article
Mikušiak, Igor.
Alenka Jensterle-Doležalová (ed.): Vzájemným pohledem: česko-slovinské a slovinsko-české styky ve 20. století. Porta Balkanica. 2012, vol. 4, iss. 1-2, pp. 111–113.
Article
Zacharová, Marta.
Bulharskí záhradníci na Slovensku : ich príchod, spôsob života a peripetie spôsobené zmenami režimov v minulom storočí. Porta Balkanica. 2012, vol. 4, iss. 1-2, pp. 57–61.
Article
Daskalova, Dobrina.
Funkcia a pragmatika jedných z osobitných slovesných foriem v bulharskom jazyku. Porta Balkanica. 2012, vol. 4, iss. 1-2, pp. 76–80.