Title: On some basic issues of the theory of functional sentence perspective. IV, (Some thoughts on Marie Luise Thein's critique of the theory)
Source document: Brno studies in English. 1997, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. [51]-85
Extent
[51]-85
-
ISSN1211-1791
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/104340
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
Note
Název článku v tišteném obsahu: On some basic issues of the theory of functional sentence perspective. IV, (Notes on Marie Luise Thein's critique of the theory)
References
[1] DE BEAUGRANDE, R. (1991). 'The heritage of functional sentence perspective from the standpoint of text linguistics', Linguistica Pragensia 1.22-2 6 and 55-86.
[2] BOLINGER, D. L. (1952). 'Linear modification', Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 67.1117-44.
[3] BREIVIK, L. E., A. Hille and S. Johansson, eds. (1989). Essays on English language in honour of Bertil Sundby (Oslo: Novus Forlag).
[4] ČMEJRKOVÁ, S. and F. Štícha, eds. (1944). The syntax of sentence and text (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins).
[5] DANEŠ, F. (1966). The relation of centre and periphery as a language universal, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.9-21.
[6] COOPER, Ch. R., and S. Greenbaum, eds. (1986). Studying writing: Linguistic approaches, vol.1 (Beverly Hills: Sage).
[7] DAVIES, M , and L. Ravelli, eds. (1992). Advances in systemic linguistics (London and New York: Pinter).
[8] DIRVEN, R. and V. Fried, eds. (1987). Functionalism in linguistics (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins).
[9] FIRBAS, J. (1957). 'K otázce nezákladových podmětů v současné angličtině' [On the problem of non-thematic subjects in contemporary English], Časopis pro moderní filologii 39.22-42 and 165-73. See Firbas 1966.
[10] FIRBAS, J. (1959). 'Thoughts on the communicative function of the verb in English, German and Czech', Brno studies in English 1.39-68.
[11] FIRBAS, J. (1964). 'On the defining the theme in functional sentence analysis', Travaux linguistiques de Prague, 1.267-80.
[12] FIRBAS, J. (1966). 'Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English', Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.239-56. An abridged English version of Firbas 1957.
[13] FIRBAS, J. (1968). 'On the prosodic features of the modern English finite verb as a means of functional sentence perspective', Brno studies in English 7.11-48.
[14] FIRBAS, J. (1969). 'On the prosodic features of the modem English finite verb-object combination as means of functional sentence perspective', Brno studies in English 8.49-59.
[15] FIRBAS, J. (1972). 'On the interplay of prosodic and non-prosodic means of functional sentence perspective', in Fried (ed). 1972.77-94.
[16] FIRBAS, J. (1976). 'A study in the functional perspective of the English and the Slavonic interrogative sentences', Brno studies in English, 12.9-56.
[17] FIRBAS, J. (1980). 'Post-intonation centre prosodic shade in the modem English clause', in Greenbaum et. al. (eds.) 1980.125-133.
[18] FIRBAS, J. (1985). 'Thoughts on functional sentence perspective, intonation and emotiveness', Brno studies in English, 16.11-48.
[19] FIRBAS, J. (1986). 'On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of functional sentence perspective', in Cooper and Greenbaum (eds.). 1986.40-71.
[20] FIRBAS, J. (1987a). 'Thoughts on functional sentence perspective, intonation and emotiveness, Part two', Brno studies in English 17.9-49.
[21] FIRBAS, J. (1987b). 'On the delimitation of the theme in functional sentence perspective', in Dirven and Fried (eds.). 1987.137-56.
[22] FIRBAS, J. (1989). 'Interpreting Psalm 91 from the point of view of functional sentence perspective', in Breivik et al. (eds).107-116.
[23] FIRBAS, J. (1990). 'Degrees of communicative dynamism and degrees of prosodic prominence (weight)', Brno studies in English 18.21-66 and appendix (10 pp.).
[24] FIRBAS, J. (1992a) Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
[25] FIRBAS, J. (1992b). 'On some basic problems of functional sentence perspective', in Davies and Ravelli (eds.). 1992.167-88.
[26] FIRBAS J. (1993). 'Can the functional perspective of a spoken sentence be predicted from that of its written counterpart?', Brno studies in English 20.23-50 and appendix (8 pp.)
[27] FIRBAS, J. (1994). 'Substantiating DaneS's view of givenness as a graded phenomenon', in Čmejrková and Štícha (eds.).l 19-29.
[28] FIRBAS, J. (1995). The retrievability span, Brno studies in English 21.17-45.
[29] FIRBAS, J. (1996). 'Exploring Vilem Mathesius' use of the term theme', Philologica Pragensia 1996.5-23 and 63-86.
[30] FRIED, V., ed. (1972). The Prague School of Linguistics and language teaching (London: Oxford University Press).
[31] GIMSON, A.C. (1962). An introduction to the pronunciation of English (London: Arnold).
[32] GREENBAUM, S, G. LEECH and J. SVARTVIK, eds. (1980). Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk (London and New York: Longman).
[33] HALLIDAY, M . A. K. (1970). A course of spoken English: intonation (London: Oxford Univesity Press).
[34] MATHESIUS V. (1942). 'Ze srovnávacích studií slovosledných' [From comparative word order studies], Časopis pro moderní filologii 28.181-90 and 302-7.
[35] MACCARTHY, P. A . D. (1956). English conversation reader (London: Longmans, Green and Co.).
[36] LUTZ, L. (1981). Zum Thema "Thema", Hamburger Arbeiten zur Linguistik und Texttheorie, Bd. 1 (Hamburg: Hamburger Buchagentur).
[37] O'CONNOR, J. D. O., and G. F. ARNOLD (1973). Intonation of colloquial English, 2nd. ed. (London: Longman).
[38] QUIRK, R., S. GREENBAUM. G. LEECH and J. SVARTVIK (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language (London and New York: Longman)
[39] SVOBODA. A . (1968). 'The hierarchy of communicative units and fields as illustrated by English attributive constructions', Brno studies in English 7.49-85.
[40] SVOBODA, A . (1981). Diatheme (Brno: Masaryk University).
[41] SVOBODA, A . (1983). 'Thematic elements', Brno studies in English 15.49-85.
[42] THEIN, M . L. (1994). Die informationelle Struktur im Englischen (Tübingen: Niemeyer).
[43] UHLENBECK (1983). 'Linguistics, neither psychology nor sociology', 1983 NIAS lecture (Wassenaar: NIAS).
[44] VACHEK, J. (1966). 'On the integration of the peripheral elements into the system of language', Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.23-37.
[2] BOLINGER, D. L. (1952). 'Linear modification', Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 67.1117-44.
[3] BREIVIK, L. E., A. Hille and S. Johansson, eds. (1989). Essays on English language in honour of Bertil Sundby (Oslo: Novus Forlag).
[4] ČMEJRKOVÁ, S. and F. Štícha, eds. (1944). The syntax of sentence and text (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins).
[5] DANEŠ, F. (1966). The relation of centre and periphery as a language universal, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.9-21.
[6] COOPER, Ch. R., and S. Greenbaum, eds. (1986). Studying writing: Linguistic approaches, vol.1 (Beverly Hills: Sage).
[7] DAVIES, M , and L. Ravelli, eds. (1992). Advances in systemic linguistics (London and New York: Pinter).
[8] DIRVEN, R. and V. Fried, eds. (1987). Functionalism in linguistics (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins).
[9] FIRBAS, J. (1957). 'K otázce nezákladových podmětů v současné angličtině' [On the problem of non-thematic subjects in contemporary English], Časopis pro moderní filologii 39.22-42 and 165-73. See Firbas 1966.
[10] FIRBAS, J. (1959). 'Thoughts on the communicative function of the verb in English, German and Czech', Brno studies in English 1.39-68.
[11] FIRBAS, J. (1964). 'On the defining the theme in functional sentence analysis', Travaux linguistiques de Prague, 1.267-80.
[12] FIRBAS, J. (1966). 'Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English', Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.239-56. An abridged English version of Firbas 1957.
[13] FIRBAS, J. (1968). 'On the prosodic features of the modern English finite verb as a means of functional sentence perspective', Brno studies in English 7.11-48.
[14] FIRBAS, J. (1969). 'On the prosodic features of the modem English finite verb-object combination as means of functional sentence perspective', Brno studies in English 8.49-59.
[15] FIRBAS, J. (1972). 'On the interplay of prosodic and non-prosodic means of functional sentence perspective', in Fried (ed). 1972.77-94.
[16] FIRBAS, J. (1976). 'A study in the functional perspective of the English and the Slavonic interrogative sentences', Brno studies in English, 12.9-56.
[17] FIRBAS, J. (1980). 'Post-intonation centre prosodic shade in the modem English clause', in Greenbaum et. al. (eds.) 1980.125-133.
[18] FIRBAS, J. (1985). 'Thoughts on functional sentence perspective, intonation and emotiveness', Brno studies in English, 16.11-48.
[19] FIRBAS, J. (1986). 'On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of functional sentence perspective', in Cooper and Greenbaum (eds.). 1986.40-71.
[20] FIRBAS, J. (1987a). 'Thoughts on functional sentence perspective, intonation and emotiveness, Part two', Brno studies in English 17.9-49.
[21] FIRBAS, J. (1987b). 'On the delimitation of the theme in functional sentence perspective', in Dirven and Fried (eds.). 1987.137-56.
[22] FIRBAS, J. (1989). 'Interpreting Psalm 91 from the point of view of functional sentence perspective', in Breivik et al. (eds).107-116.
[23] FIRBAS, J. (1990). 'Degrees of communicative dynamism and degrees of prosodic prominence (weight)', Brno studies in English 18.21-66 and appendix (10 pp.).
[24] FIRBAS, J. (1992a) Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
[25] FIRBAS, J. (1992b). 'On some basic problems of functional sentence perspective', in Davies and Ravelli (eds.). 1992.167-88.
[26] FIRBAS J. (1993). 'Can the functional perspective of a spoken sentence be predicted from that of its written counterpart?', Brno studies in English 20.23-50 and appendix (8 pp.)
[27] FIRBAS, J. (1994). 'Substantiating DaneS's view of givenness as a graded phenomenon', in Čmejrková and Štícha (eds.).l 19-29.
[28] FIRBAS, J. (1995). The retrievability span, Brno studies in English 21.17-45.
[29] FIRBAS, J. (1996). 'Exploring Vilem Mathesius' use of the term theme', Philologica Pragensia 1996.5-23 and 63-86.
[30] FRIED, V., ed. (1972). The Prague School of Linguistics and language teaching (London: Oxford University Press).
[31] GIMSON, A.C. (1962). An introduction to the pronunciation of English (London: Arnold).
[32] GREENBAUM, S, G. LEECH and J. SVARTVIK, eds. (1980). Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk (London and New York: Longman).
[33] HALLIDAY, M . A. K. (1970). A course of spoken English: intonation (London: Oxford Univesity Press).
[34] MATHESIUS V. (1942). 'Ze srovnávacích studií slovosledných' [From comparative word order studies], Časopis pro moderní filologii 28.181-90 and 302-7.
[35] MACCARTHY, P. A . D. (1956). English conversation reader (London: Longmans, Green and Co.).
[36] LUTZ, L. (1981). Zum Thema "Thema", Hamburger Arbeiten zur Linguistik und Texttheorie, Bd. 1 (Hamburg: Hamburger Buchagentur).
[37] O'CONNOR, J. D. O., and G. F. ARNOLD (1973). Intonation of colloquial English, 2nd. ed. (London: Longman).
[38] QUIRK, R., S. GREENBAUM. G. LEECH and J. SVARTVIK (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language (London and New York: Longman)
[39] SVOBODA. A . (1968). 'The hierarchy of communicative units and fields as illustrated by English attributive constructions', Brno studies in English 7.49-85.
[40] SVOBODA, A . (1981). Diatheme (Brno: Masaryk University).
[41] SVOBODA, A . (1983). 'Thematic elements', Brno studies in English 15.49-85.
[42] THEIN, M . L. (1994). Die informationelle Struktur im Englischen (Tübingen: Niemeyer).
[43] UHLENBECK (1983). 'Linguistics, neither psychology nor sociology', 1983 NIAS lecture (Wassenaar: NIAS).
[44] VACHEK, J. (1966). 'On the integration of the peripheral elements into the system of language', Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.23-37.