Title: Zur Konstruktion ab urbe condita
Source document: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2014, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. [93]-111
Extent
[93]-111
-
ISSN1803-7402 (print)2336-4424 (online)
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/130052
Type: Article
Language
Summary language
License: Not specified license
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
Abstract(s)
An essay on the Latin construction called Ab urbe condita, including the explanation of the term and its adequate construction in English, German, Spanish and Italian. There is also an explanation of the structure of the dominant participle term, and its types (absolutive and prepositional) are described. The starting point is an almost forgotten O. W. Heick's book The Ab Urbe Condita Construction in Latin from 1936, which contains an incredibly broad material. Partly influenced by the modern lingustics, the author is trying to outline the development of the construction from both linguistic and philosophical point of view. She localizes the occurrence of the dominant participle in different fields and literary genres – to mention the most important: state administration, legal phraseology, and rhetoric as well as practical rhetoric. All these fields are strongly connected with M. Tullius Cicero. The author also mentions coin inscriptions, where we also find the ab urbe condita construction. In the evaluation of the study materials concerning both frequency and typology, there are not only authors taken into account, but prosaic literary genres, too.
References
[1] Bahník, Václav e.a. Slovník antické kultury. 1974. Praha: Svoboda.
[2] Baviera, Giovanni ‒ Riccobono, Salvatore ‒ Ferrini, Contardo [Eds.]. Fontes iuris romani antejustiniani. 1909. Florentiae: Barbera.
[3] Bolkenstein, Machtelt A. 1981. "Factivity as a Condition for an Optional Expression Rule in Latin: the 'Ab Urbe Condita' construction and its underlying representation." In Bolkenstein, Machtelt A. Predication and Expression in Functional Grammar. London: Academic Press, 205‒234.
[4] Brugmann, Karl – Delbrück, Berthold. 1897‒1916. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: K. J. Trübner.
[5] Bruns, Carl, Georg – Gradenwitz, Otto ‒ Mommsen, Theodor. 1909. Fontes Juris Romani Antiqui. Tübingen: I. C. B. Mohr.
[6] Coleman, Robert. 1989. "The Rise and Fall of Absolute Constructions: A Latin Case History." In Calboli, Gualtiero [Ed.]. Subordination and Other Topics in Latin: Proceedings of the Third Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Bologna, 1‒5 April 1985. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 353‒374.
[7] Conte, Gian, Biaggio. 2003. Dějiny římské literatury. 1. vyd. D. Bartoňková [transl.]. Praha: Koniasch Latin Press.
[8] Fromm, Erich. 1976. Mít nebo být? Praha: Naše vojsko.
[9] Heick, William, Otto. 1936. The Ab Urbe Condita Construction. Diss., Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
[10] Keydana, Götz. 1997. Absolute Konstruktionen in altindogermanischen Sprachen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
[11] Kühner, Raphael. 1912. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Bd. 2. Hannover: Hahn.
[12] Laughton, Eric. 1964. The Participle in Cicero. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[13] Menge, Hermann. 2000. Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
[14] Novotný, František. 1955. Historická mluvnice latinského jazyka 2. Praha: Nakl. československé akademie věd.
[15] Novotný, František. 1992. Základní latinská mluvnice. 2. vyd. Praha: H. & H.
[16] Ogle, Marbury, Bladen 1926. English and Latin. New York ‒ London: The Century co.
[17] Pinkster, Harm. 1988. Lateinische Syntax und Semantik. Tübingen: Francke.
[18] RIC = Roman Imperial Coinage. Alphabetical Index of Rulers [online], 2009. Available from URL http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/ [cit. 2013‒12‒08].
[19] Rosén, Hannah. 1999. Latine loqui: Trends and directions in the crystallization of classical Latin. München: W. Fink.
[20] Stolz, Friedrich – Schmalz, Joseph, Hermann. 1928. Lateinische Grammatik. 5. Ausgabe. Leumann, Manu – Hoffman, Johann B. [Eds.]. München: C. H. Beck.
[21] Storme, Benjamin. 2010. "Sicilia amissa: syntagme nominal ou proposition subordonée?" Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes, 84, 119‒136.
[22] Touratier, Christian. 1994. Syntaxe Latine. Louvain-la-Nueve: Peeters.
[23] Urbanová, daniela ‒ Blažek, Václav. 2008. Národy starověké Itálie, jejich jazyky a písma. Brno: Host.
[24] Vlašín, Štěpán e. a. 1984. Slovník literární teorie. Praha: Československý spisovatel.
[2] Baviera, Giovanni ‒ Riccobono, Salvatore ‒ Ferrini, Contardo [Eds.]. Fontes iuris romani antejustiniani. 1909. Florentiae: Barbera.
[3] Bolkenstein, Machtelt A. 1981. "Factivity as a Condition for an Optional Expression Rule in Latin: the 'Ab Urbe Condita' construction and its underlying representation." In Bolkenstein, Machtelt A. Predication and Expression in Functional Grammar. London: Academic Press, 205‒234.
[4] Brugmann, Karl – Delbrück, Berthold. 1897‒1916. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: K. J. Trübner.
[5] Bruns, Carl, Georg – Gradenwitz, Otto ‒ Mommsen, Theodor. 1909. Fontes Juris Romani Antiqui. Tübingen: I. C. B. Mohr.
[6] Coleman, Robert. 1989. "The Rise and Fall of Absolute Constructions: A Latin Case History." In Calboli, Gualtiero [Ed.]. Subordination and Other Topics in Latin: Proceedings of the Third Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Bologna, 1‒5 April 1985. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 353‒374.
[7] Conte, Gian, Biaggio. 2003. Dějiny římské literatury. 1. vyd. D. Bartoňková [transl.]. Praha: Koniasch Latin Press.
[8] Fromm, Erich. 1976. Mít nebo být? Praha: Naše vojsko.
[9] Heick, William, Otto. 1936. The Ab Urbe Condita Construction. Diss., Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
[10] Keydana, Götz. 1997. Absolute Konstruktionen in altindogermanischen Sprachen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
[11] Kühner, Raphael. 1912. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Bd. 2. Hannover: Hahn.
[12] Laughton, Eric. 1964. The Participle in Cicero. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[13] Menge, Hermann. 2000. Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
[14] Novotný, František. 1955. Historická mluvnice latinského jazyka 2. Praha: Nakl. československé akademie věd.
[15] Novotný, František. 1992. Základní latinská mluvnice. 2. vyd. Praha: H. & H.
[16] Ogle, Marbury, Bladen 1926. English and Latin. New York ‒ London: The Century co.
[17] Pinkster, Harm. 1988. Lateinische Syntax und Semantik. Tübingen: Francke.
[18] RIC = Roman Imperial Coinage. Alphabetical Index of Rulers [online], 2009. Available from URL http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/ [cit. 2013‒12‒08].
[19] Rosén, Hannah. 1999. Latine loqui: Trends and directions in the crystallization of classical Latin. München: W. Fink.
[20] Stolz, Friedrich – Schmalz, Joseph, Hermann. 1928. Lateinische Grammatik. 5. Ausgabe. Leumann, Manu – Hoffman, Johann B. [Eds.]. München: C. H. Beck.
[21] Storme, Benjamin. 2010. "Sicilia amissa: syntagme nominal ou proposition subordonée?" Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes, 84, 119‒136.
[22] Touratier, Christian. 1994. Syntaxe Latine. Louvain-la-Nueve: Peeters.
[23] Urbanová, daniela ‒ Blažek, Václav. 2008. Národy starověké Itálie, jejich jazyky a písma. Brno: Host.
[24] Vlašín, Štěpán e. a. 1984. Slovník literární teorie. Praha: Československý spisovatel.