Title: Dawn of verbal suppletion in Indo-European languages
Source document: Linguistica Brunensia. 2014, vol. 62, iss. 1, pp. 57-65
Extent
57-65
-
ISSN1803-7410 (print)2336-4440 (online)
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/130121
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
Rights access
embargoed access
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
Abstract(s)
Verbal suppletion found in the earliest records of the daughter branches of the Indo-European language family is the focus of the paper presented at 2nd Indo-European Colloquium in Brno, 2013. If considering one first and best attested language in each branch, we find almost seventy (so far described) suppletive verbal paradigms. The paper examines their respective Proto-Indo-European roots and concludes about the relationship of their form and semantics. Special attention was given to the verbs of being, for which all branches choose to use the root √h1es- for the present form, while as many as seven stems combine with √h1es- for non-present usage. The range of semantic fields found among the suppletive verbs is discussed with conclusions concerning the relationship of form and semantics.
References
[1] Brinton, L. 2010. The Structure of Modern English: A Linguistic Introduction. John Benjamins.
[2] Buck, C. D. 1949. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
[3] Corbett, G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words, Language, vol. 83/1 Baltimore: Waverly Press. | DOI 10.1353/lan.2007.0006
[4] Kölligan, D. 2007. Suppletion und Defektivität im griechischen Verbum. Bremen: Hempen Verlag.
[5] LIV2: Rix, H.– Kummel, M. (eds.) 2001. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
[6] Kortland, F. 1996. The Proto-Armenian Verbal System. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Armenian Linguistics. Delmar: Caravan Books.
[7] Melchert, C. 2008. Grammar of the Hittite language, part 1. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.
[8] Meľčuk, I.: Suppletion. 2000. Morphology. In: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation 1. Geert Booij, Christian Lehmannand Joachim Mugdan(eds.). Berlin, New York: Moyton de Gruyter, pp. 510–524.
[9] Mc Cone, K. 1997. The early Irish Verb. Naas: An Sagart. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
[10] Osthoff, H. 1899. Vom Suppletivwesen der indogermanishen Sprachen. Heidelberg: Universitätsbuchdruckerei von J. Horning.
[11] Veselinova, L. 2006. Suppletion in verb paradigms – bits and pieces of a puzzle. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[2] Buck, C. D. 1949. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
[3] Corbett, G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words, Language, vol. 83/1 Baltimore: Waverly Press. | DOI 10.1353/lan.2007.0006
[4] Kölligan, D. 2007. Suppletion und Defektivität im griechischen Verbum. Bremen: Hempen Verlag.
[5] LIV2: Rix, H.– Kummel, M. (eds.) 2001. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
[6] Kortland, F. 1996. The Proto-Armenian Verbal System. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Armenian Linguistics. Delmar: Caravan Books.
[7] Melchert, C. 2008. Grammar of the Hittite language, part 1. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.
[8] Meľčuk, I.: Suppletion. 2000. Morphology. In: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation 1. Geert Booij, Christian Lehmannand Joachim Mugdan(eds.). Berlin, New York: Moyton de Gruyter, pp. 510–524.
[9] Mc Cone, K. 1997. The early Irish Verb. Naas: An Sagart. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
[10] Osthoff, H. 1899. Vom Suppletivwesen der indogermanishen Sprachen. Heidelberg: Universitätsbuchdruckerei von J. Horning.
[11] Veselinova, L. 2006. Suppletion in verb paradigms – bits and pieces of a puzzle. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.