"Doing interrupting" as a discursive tactic in argumentation : a post-pragmatic politeness theory perspective

Title: "Doing interrupting" as a discursive tactic in argumentation : a post-pragmatic politeness theory perspective
Source document: Brno studies in English. 2009, vol. 35, iss. 2, pp. [145]-163
Extent
[145]-163
  • ISSN
    0524-6881 (print)
    1805-0867 (online)
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
 

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

Abstract(s)
Underlying every speech system is the turn-taking system which is in charge of effective distribution of participation space (turn) and is the source of participation rights and obligations, esp. participants' right to turn. Turn boundaries often become an area of struggle for participation, with interruption becoming a means of expropriation of the current speaker's turn as well as a resource for the exercise and display of discursive power. The paper focuses on interruption as a discursive tactic employed by participants in the public-participation mass-media genre of phone-in and approaches its status from the perspective of post-modern politeness theory.
References
[1] Arundale, Robert (1999) 'An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory'. Pragmatics 9, 119–154. | DOI 10.1075/prag.9.1.07aru

[2] Arundale, Robert (2006) 'Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness'. Journal of Politeness Research 2(2), 193–216.

[3] Bousfield, Derek (2008) 'Impoliteness in the struggle for power'. In: Bousfield, Derek, and Miriam A. Locher (eds.) Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 127–154.

[4] Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Stephen (1978) 'Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena'. In: Goody, E.N. (ed.) Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–289.

[5] Brown, Penelope, and Steven C. Levinson (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[6] Eelen, Gino (2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.

[7] Ferenčík, Milan (2006) 'Non-impolite interruptions: Politeness aspects of recognitional interruptions on talk radio'. Discourse Studies: Trends and Perspectives. Nitra: FF UKF, 47–58.

[8] Ferenčík, Milan (2007) 'Exercising politeness: Membership categorisation in a radio phone-in programme'. Pragmatics 17(3), 351–370. | DOI 10.1075/prag.17.3.01fer

[9] Goffman, Ervin (1963) 'On face-work'. Interaction Ritual. New York: Anchor Books.

[10] Goldberg, Julia (1990) 'Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power and rapport oriented acts'. Journal of Pragmatics 14, 883–903. | DOI 10.1016/0378-2166(90)90045-F

[11] Halliday, Michael A.K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

[12] Haugh, Michael (2007) 'The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative'. Journal of Politeness Research 3, 295–317.

[13] He, Agnes W. (2004) 'Identity construction in Chinese heritage language classes'. Pragmatics 4(2), 199–216.

[14] Henley, Nancy and Barrie Thorne (1975) Language and Sex: Difference of Dominance. Massachussetts: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

[15] Holtgraves, Thomas (2005) 'Social psychology, cognitive psychology, and linguistic politeness'. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1), 73–94.

[16] Hutchby, Ian (1992) 'Confrontation talk: Aspects of 'interruption' in argument sequences on talk radio'. Text 12(3), 343–371.

[17] Hutchby, Ian (1996) Confrontation talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

[18] Jefferson, Gail (1981) The abominable "ne"?: The working paper exploring the phenomenon of post-response pursuit of response. (Occasional Paper No. 6). Manchester, UK: University of Manchester, Department of Sociology.

[19] Jefferson, Gail (1986) 'Notes on latency in overlap onset'. Human Studies 9, 153–183. | DOI 10.1007/BF00148125

[20] Kasper, Gabrielle (1990) 'Linguistic politeness: Current research issues'. Journal of Pragmatics 14, 193–218. | DOI 10.1016/0378-2166(90)90080-W

[21] Lakoff, Robin (1973) 'The logic of politeness; or minding your p's and q's'. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, 292–305.

[22] Leech, Geoffrey (1983) Principles of Politeness. London: Longman.

[23] Locher, Miriam (2004) Power and Politeness in Action. Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

[24] Locher, Miriam and Richard J. Watts (2008) 'Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour'. In: Bousfield, Derek, and Miriam A. Locher (eds.) Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 77–99.

[25] Nekvapil, Jiří (2000) 'Teze k utváření interpretativní sociolingvistiky'. Časopis pro moderní filologii 82(1), 1–3.

[26] Psathas, George (1995) Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishers.

[27] Sacks, Harvey (2004) 'An initial characterization of the organization of speaker turn-taking in conversation'. In: Lerner, Gene H. (ed.) Conversation Analysis. Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 35–42.

[28] Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Jefferson, Gail (1974) 'A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation'. Language 50(4), 696–735. | DOI 10.2307/412243

[29] Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Jefferson, Gail (1978) 'A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation'. In: Schenkein, J. (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press.

[30] Spencer-Oatey, Helen (2000) 'Rapport management: A framework for analysis'. In: Spencer-Oatey, Helen (ed.) Culturally Speaking. Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London: Continuum.

[31] Terkourafi, Marina (2005) 'Beyond the micro-level in politeness research'. Journal of Politeness Research 1, 237–262. | DOI 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237

[32] Thornborrow, Joanna (2001) 'Authenticating talk: Building public identities in audience participation broadcasts'. Discourse Studies 3(4), 459–479. | DOI 10.1177/1461445601003004008

[33] Watts, Richard (1992) 'Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality'. In: Watts, Richard, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich (eds.) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practise. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

[34] Watts, Richard J. (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[35] Watts, Richard J. (2005) 'Linguistic politeness research: Quo vadis ?'. In: Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich (eds.) Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, xi–xlvii.

[36] Watts, Richard J. and Miriam Locher (2005) 'Politeness as relational work'. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1), 9–34.

[37] Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds.) (1992) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

[38] Wenger, Etienne (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[39] Young, Richard F. (2008) Language and Interaction. London and New York: Routledge.