Title: Academic knowledge presentation in MA theses: from corpus compilation to case studies of disciplinary conventions
Source document: Brno studies in English. 2012, vol. 38, iss. 2, pp. [149]-165
Extent
[149]-165
-
ISSN0524-6881 (print)1805-0867 (online)
Persistent identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2012-2-9
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/126948
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
Abstract(s)
This article discusses discipline-specific conventions in presenting academic knowledge in academic writing, an important first research text at many universities. Its empirical basis is a new corpus of South African MA theses (the ZAMA corpus) from Stellenbosch University. A pilot corpus of 100 MA theses and over 4 million words was compiled, paying special attention to disciplinary breadth from Humanities and Social Sciences to Natural Sciences and Engineering, including some interdisciplinary subjects (like Geography) and Law. Altogether between four and eight texts were chosen from 18 disciplines, which were later categorised deductively into six discipline types. Other factors taken into consideration were the socio-biographical diversity of authors, esp. ethnic/language by author's name (distinguishing English, Afrikaans, Black South African names, and a few others). The decisions of corpus compilation are carefully documented in order to obtain a stratified and balanced corpus for research in the South African university context. Descriptive statistical analyses were carried out to test whether discipline-specific frequency patterns could be found in three case studies using variables indicating metadiscourse conventions, such as modal auxiliaries, personal pronouns, and cohesive linkers.
References
[1] Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. (2004) 'The verb in Philippine English: A preliminary analysis of modal would'. World Englishes 23, 113–127 | DOI 10.1111/j.1467-971X.2004.00338.x
[2] Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Ed Finegan (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. New York: Longman.
[3] Bolton, Kinglsey, Gerald Nelson and Joseph Hung (2002) 'A corpus-based study of connectors in student writing'. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7 (2), 165–182. | DOI 10.1075/ijcl.7.2.02bol
[4] Collins, Peter (2009) Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
[5] Fløttum, Kjersti, Trine Gedde-Dahl and Torodd Kinn (2006) Academic Voices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[6] Gao, Quoping (2012) 'Interpersonal functions of epistemic modality in Academic English Writing'. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 35, 352–364.
[7] Halliday, M.A.K. and Ruqaia Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
[8] Hůlková, Irena (2011) 'Conjunctive adverbials in academic written discourse'. In: Schmied, Josef (ed.) Academic Writing in Europe: Empirical Perspectives. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag, 129–142.
[9] Hyland, Ken (2002) 'Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing'. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1091–1112. | DOI 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
[10] Hyland, Ken (2007) Metadiscourse. Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
[11] Hyland, Ken (2012) Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
[12] Johnson, Daniel E. (2012) Rbrul (Version 2.05), http://www.danielezrajohnson.com/rbrul.html (accessed on 9 September 2012).
[13] Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
[14] Sala, Michele (fc.) 'Language change in legal research article titles'. In: Poppi, Franca and Winnie Cheng (eds.) The Three Waves of Globalization: Winds of Change in Professional, Institutional and Academic Genres. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[15] Schmied, Josef (2008a) 'Comparing complexity and interclausal sentence relations in african academic writing'. In Wolf, Hans Georg, Lothar Peter and Frank Polzenhagen (eds.) Focus on English. Linguistic Structure, Language Variation and Discursive Use. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag, 173–188.
[16] Schmied, Josef (2008b) 'Hedges in specialised vs. popular academic interaction: A case study of medical texts'. Discourse and Interaction 1 (2), 85–98.
[17] Schmied, Josef (2011) 'Academic writing in Europe: a survey of approaches and problems'. In: Schmied, Josef (ed.) Academic Writing in Europe: Empirical Perspectives. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag, 1–22.
[18] Swales, John (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.
[19] Swales, John (2004) Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: CUP.
[20] Warner, Antony R. (1993) English Auxiliaries. Cambridge: CUP.
[2] Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Ed Finegan (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. New York: Longman.
[3] Bolton, Kinglsey, Gerald Nelson and Joseph Hung (2002) 'A corpus-based study of connectors in student writing'. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7 (2), 165–182. | DOI 10.1075/ijcl.7.2.02bol
[4] Collins, Peter (2009) Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
[5] Fløttum, Kjersti, Trine Gedde-Dahl and Torodd Kinn (2006) Academic Voices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[6] Gao, Quoping (2012) 'Interpersonal functions of epistemic modality in Academic English Writing'. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 35, 352–364.
[7] Halliday, M.A.K. and Ruqaia Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
[8] Hůlková, Irena (2011) 'Conjunctive adverbials in academic written discourse'. In: Schmied, Josef (ed.) Academic Writing in Europe: Empirical Perspectives. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag, 129–142.
[9] Hyland, Ken (2002) 'Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing'. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1091–1112. | DOI 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
[10] Hyland, Ken (2007) Metadiscourse. Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
[11] Hyland, Ken (2012) Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
[12] Johnson, Daniel E. (2012) Rbrul (Version 2.05), http://www.danielezrajohnson.com/rbrul.html (accessed on 9 September 2012).
[13] Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
[14] Sala, Michele (fc.) 'Language change in legal research article titles'. In: Poppi, Franca and Winnie Cheng (eds.) The Three Waves of Globalization: Winds of Change in Professional, Institutional and Academic Genres. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[15] Schmied, Josef (2008a) 'Comparing complexity and interclausal sentence relations in african academic writing'. In Wolf, Hans Georg, Lothar Peter and Frank Polzenhagen (eds.) Focus on English. Linguistic Structure, Language Variation and Discursive Use. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag, 173–188.
[16] Schmied, Josef (2008b) 'Hedges in specialised vs. popular academic interaction: A case study of medical texts'. Discourse and Interaction 1 (2), 85–98.
[17] Schmied, Josef (2011) 'Academic writing in Europe: a survey of approaches and problems'. In: Schmied, Josef (ed.) Academic Writing in Europe: Empirical Perspectives. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag, 1–22.
[18] Swales, John (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.
[19] Swales, John (2004) Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: CUP.
[20] Warner, Antony R. (1993) English Auxiliaries. Cambridge: CUP.