Normatività e trasgressione nella distribuzione paradigmatica del suppletivismo verbale romanzo

Title: Normatività e trasgressione nella distribuzione paradigmatica del suppletivismo verbale romanzo
Variant title:
  • Normativity and transgression in the paradigmatic distribution of verbal romance suppletion
Source document: Études romanes de Brno. 2018, vol. 39, iss. 1, pp. 79-93
  • ISSN
    1803-7399 (print)
    2336-4416 (online)
Type: Article
License: Not specified license

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

La struttura apparentemente irregolare dei paradigmi verbali suppletivi nelle lingue romanze può rivelare a un'attenta osservazione una logica ben radicata nel comportamento linguistico dei parlanti che è in grado di conservarsi in modo sostanzialmente uniforme a distanza di tempo e di spazio. Grazie all'introduzione del concetto di 'morfoma' (Aronoff 1994) è possibile valutare queste presunte anomalie come un fenomeno centrale sia nella naturale evoluzione diacronica delle lingue romanze che nella continua riorganizzazione dei paradigmi verbali ad opera dei parlanti. Tuttavia, una delle principali difficoltà di una simile prospettiva risiede nell'impossibilità di astrarre in assoluto i principi generali alla base di queste distribuzioni paradigmatiche. Una simile problematica però può essere adeguatamente affrontata, sebbene non del tutto risolta, se la ricerca su questo tema ricorre alle teorie, sia passate che presenti, relative al concetto di "norma linguistica", all'interno delle quali i morfomi verbali romanzi possono essere interpretati come espressione della libertà di un sistema linguistico.
The apparently irregular structure of verbal suppletive paradigms in Romance languages reveals in fact a well-established logic in the speakers' language behaviour that has been preserved with uniformity over time and space. Since the introduction of the concept of "morphome" (Aronoff 1994), it has been possible to assess these so-called anomalies as a central phenomenon both in the natural diachronic evolution and in the continuous reorganization of verbal paradigms realized by the speakers. Nevertheless, one of the main difficulties of such a perspective when applied to Romance languages stands in the impossibility of making absolute abstractions of general principles that are at the base of these distributions in verbal paradigms. However, it is possible to deal appropriately with this kind of problems, albeit not definitely solve them, if the research into this issue refers to theories, past and present, about the concept of "linguistic norm", where Romance verbal morphomes can be described as an expression of the freedom in a language system.
[1] Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

[2] Aski, J. M. (1995). Verbal suppletion: an analysis of Italian, French and Spanish 'to go'. Linguistics, 33, 403–432.

[3] Bartsch, R. (1982). The concepts of «rule» and «norm» in linguistics Lingua, 58, 51–81. | DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(82)90057-2

[4] Bhat, D. N. S. (1967). Lexical suppletion in baby talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 9 (5), 33–36.

[5] Börjars K.; & Vincent, N. (2011). The pre-conditions for suppletion. In G. Tsoulas, A. Galani, & G. Hicks (Eds.), Morphology and its Interfaces (pp. 239–265). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

[6] Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | DOI 10.1075/tsl.9

[7] Corbett, G. G. et al. (2005). Resources for Suppletion: A Typological Database and a Bibliography, Morphology and Linguistic Typology. In G. Booij, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi, & S. Scalise (Eds.), On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania, 21–23 September 2003 Università degli Studi di Bologna (pp. 35–44). proceedings.pdf

[8] Corbett, G. G. (2007). Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words Language, 83 (1), 9–42. | DOI 10.1353/lan.2007.0006

[9] Dressler, W. (1985). Sur le statut de la suppléance dans la Morphologie Naturelle Langages, 20 (78), 41–56. | DOI 10.3406/lgge.1985.2463

[10] Fertig, D. (1998). Suppletion, natural morphology, diagrammaticity Linguistics, 36 (6), 1065–1091. | DOI 10.1515/ling.1998.36.6.1065

[11] Giraudo, H.; Montermini, F.; & Pirrelli, V. (2010). Processi cognitivi nell'analisi delle classi verbali dell'italiano: un approccio sperimentale. In V. Bambini, I. Ricci, & P. M. Bertinetto (Eds.), Linguaggio e cervello – Semantica. Atti del XLII Convegno della Società di Linguistica Italiana (Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore, 25–27 settembre 2008). Roma: Bulzoni.

[12] Hinzelin, M.-O. (2011). Syncretism and Suppletion in Gallo-Romanc Verb Paradigms. In M. Maiden et al. (Eds.), Morphological autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. (pp. 287–310). New York: Oxford University Press.

[13] Hippisley, A. et al. (2004). Suppletion: frequency, categories and distribution of stems Studies in Language, 28 (2), 387–418. | DOI 10.1075/sl.28.2.05hip

[14] Itkonen, E. (2008). The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In J. Zlatev (Ed.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity (pp. 279–305). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

[15] Juge, M. (2013). Analogy as a source for suppletion. In R. Kikusava, & L. A. Reid (Eds.), Historical Linguistics 2011. Selected papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, 25 – 30 July 2011. (pp. 175–197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

[16] Ledgeway, A.; & Maiden, M. (Eds.) (2016). The Oxford guide to the romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[17] Luís, A. R.; & Bermúdez-Otero, R. (eds.). (2016). The morphome debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[18] Maiden, M. (2001). Di nuovo sulle alternanze 'velari' nel verbo italiano e spagnolo. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana, 8, 39–61.

[19] Maiden, M. (2004a). Verso una definizione morfologica delle lingue romanze. La nuova fisionomia morfologica del romanzo. Aemilianense, I, 357–404.

[20] Maiden, M. (2004b). When lexemes become allomorphs – On the genesis of suppletion. Folia linguistica, 38, 227–256.

[21] Maiden, M. (2007). La linguistica romanza alla ricerca dell'arbitrario. In D. Trotter (Ed.), Actes du XXIVe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romane, Aberystwyth, 2004 (vol. III) (pp. 506–518). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

[22] Maiden, M. (2009). From pure phonology to pure morphology the reshaping of the romance verb. In M. Russo (Ed.), Pour une typologie diachronique et synchronique des langues romanes. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes (pp. 45–82).

[23] Maiden, M. (2011). Morphophonological innovation. In M. Maiden, J. Ch. Smith, & A. Ledgeway (Eds.), The Cambridge history of the romance languages (Vol. 1–structures) (pp. 216–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[24] Maiden, M. (2016). Morphome. In A. Ledgeway, & M. Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the romance languages (pp. 708–721). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[25] Meľčuk, I. A. (1994). Suppletion: Toward a logical analysis of the concept Studies in Language, 18 (2), 339–410. | DOI 10.1075/sl.18.2.03mel

[26] Myhill, J. (2001). Suppletion, lexical meaning, semantic primitives, and translation data Linguistics, 39, 761–802. | DOI 10.1515/ling.2001.031

[27] Nebeská, I. (1996). Jazyk, norma, spisovnost. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.

[28] Nevins, A.; & Rodrigues, C. (2012). Naturalness biases, 'morphomes', and the Romance first person singular. Paper presented at University of Coimbra, Newcastle University, University of York, and University Paris VII.

[29] Nevins, A.; Rodrigues, C.; & Tang, K. (2015). The rise and fall of the L-shaped morphome: diachronic and experimental studies Probus, 27 (1), 101–155. | DOI 10.1515/probus-2015-0002

[30] O'Neill, P. (2011). The Notion of the Morphom. In M. Maiden, et al. (Eds.), Morphological autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology (pp. 70–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[31] Osthoff, H. (1899). Vom Suppletivwesen der indogermanischen Sprachen. Heidelberg: Kommissionsverlag von Alfred Wolff.

[32] Rastier, F. (2008). Conditions d'une linguistique des normes. In A. Steuckardt, & G. Siouffi (Eds.), Les linguistes et la norme – Aspects normatifs du discours linguistique, (pp. 3–20). Berne: Peter Lang.

[33] Rudes, B. A. (1980). On the nature of verbal suppletion Linguistics, 18, 655–676. | DOI 10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.655

[34] Smith, J. Ch. (2011). Change and continuity in form – function relationships. In M. Maiden, J. Ch. Smith, & A. Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the romance languages (Vol. 1–Structures) (pp. 268–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[35] Veselinova, L. N. (2006). Suppletion in Verb Paradigms: Bits and Pieces of the Puzzle. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.