Title: Studi di morfologia italoromanza : introduzione
Variant title:
- Italo-Romance morphology studies : an introduction
Source document: Études romanes de Brno. 2024, vol. 45, iss. 3, pp. 6-9
Extent
6-9
-
ISSN2336-4416 (online)
Persistent identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/ERB2024-3-1
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/digilib.80981
Type: Editorial; Editorial note
Language
License: CC BY-SA 4.0 International
Rights access
open access
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
References
[1] D'Achille, P.; & Grossmann, M. (2019). Il suffisso -ata denominale: dall'italiano antico all'italiano di oggi. Studi di Grammatica Italiana, 38, 1–21.
[2] Gaeta, L. (2004). Nomi d'azione. In M. Grossmann, & F. Rainer (a cura di), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 314–351). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
[3] Gardani, F. (2018). On morphological borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(10), e12302. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12302
[4] Grandi, N. (2017). I diminutivi come marche di attenuazione e indeterminatezza. In O.-D. Balaş, A. Ciama, M. Enăchescu, A. Gebăilă, & R.Voicu (Eds.), L'expression de l'imprecision dans les langues romanes (pp. 162‒175). Bucharest: Ars docendi –Universitatea din București.
[5] Grandi, N. (2002). Morfologie in contatto. Le costruzioni valutative nelle lingue del Mediterraneo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
[6] Matras, Y. (2007). The borrowability of grammatical categories. In Y. Matras, & J. Sakel (Eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 31–74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
[7] Meyer-Lübke, W. (1890). Italienische Grammatik. Leipzig: Reisland.
[8] Štichauer, P. (2022). Grammaticalization of auxiliary verb constructions: the case of Italo-Romance mixed perfective auxiliation systems and the 'MIXPAR' project. Linguistica Pragensia, 32(1), 59-81.
[9] Traugott, E. C.; & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes (Oxford linguistics 6) (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[2] Gaeta, L. (2004). Nomi d'azione. In M. Grossmann, & F. Rainer (a cura di), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 314–351). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
[3] Gardani, F. (2018). On morphological borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(10), e12302. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12302
[4] Grandi, N. (2017). I diminutivi come marche di attenuazione e indeterminatezza. In O.-D. Balaş, A. Ciama, M. Enăchescu, A. Gebăilă, & R.Voicu (Eds.), L'expression de l'imprecision dans les langues romanes (pp. 162‒175). Bucharest: Ars docendi –Universitatea din București.
[5] Grandi, N. (2002). Morfologie in contatto. Le costruzioni valutative nelle lingue del Mediterraneo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
[6] Matras, Y. (2007). The borrowability of grammatical categories. In Y. Matras, & J. Sakel (Eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 31–74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
[7] Meyer-Lübke, W. (1890). Italienische Grammatik. Leipzig: Reisland.
[8] Štichauer, P. (2022). Grammaticalization of auxiliary verb constructions: the case of Italo-Romance mixed perfective auxiliation systems and the 'MIXPAR' project. Linguistica Pragensia, 32(1), 59-81.
[9] Traugott, E. C.; & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes (Oxford linguistics 6) (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.