Title: An ordered-triple theory of language
Variant title:
- Třísložková teorie jazyka
Source document: Brno studies in English. 1976, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 159-186
Extent
159-186
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/118077
Type: Article
Language
Summary language
License: Not specified license
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
Note
Studie od více autorů (Aleš Svoboda et al.).
References
[1] Adamec, P. (1966). Porjadok slov v russkom jazyke (Word order in Russian] (Prague).
[2] Ajdukiewicz, K. (1965). Logika pragmatyczna (Warszawa).
[3] Apresjan, Ju. D. (1967). Eksperimental'noje issledovanije semantiki russkogo glagola [The experimental investigation of the semantics of the Russian verb] (Moscow).
[4] Bierwisch, M. (1970). Semantics, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 166—184.
[5] Bolinger, D. (1967), Adjectives in English: attribution and predication, Lingua, vol. 18 1.1—34 (Amsterdam). | DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(67)90018-6
[6] Bolinger, D. (1969). Categories, features, attributes, Brno Studies in English 8.37—41 (Brno).
[7] Bott, M. F. (1970). Computational linguistics, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 215—228.
[8] Campbell, R., Wales, B. (1970) The study of language acquisition, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 242—260.
[9] Chomsky, N., Miller, G. A. (1963) Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages, in R. D. Luce, R. Bush, E. Galanter (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology 2.269—322 (New York).
[10] Chomsky, N. (1968). Deep structures, surface structures and semantic interpretations, mimeographed.
[11] Church, A. (1956). Introduction to mathematical logic, vol. 1 (Princeton, New Yersey).
[12] Curry, H. B. (1961). Some logical aspects of grammatical structure, Proceedings in applied mathematics, vol. 12.56—68 (Providence).
[13] Dahl, Ö. (1971). Tenses and world-states, Gothenburg papers in theoretical linguistics 6 (Gothenburg).
[14] Daneš, F. (1964). A three-level approach to syntax, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.225—240 (Prague).
[15] Daneš, F. (1966). The relation of centre and periphery as a language universal, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.9—21 (Prague).
[16] Daneš, F. (1971). On linguistic strata (levels), Travaux linguistiques de Prague 4.127—43 (Prague).
[17] Dušková, L. (1972). The passive voice in Czech and English, Philologica Pragensia 15.93—118 (Prague).
[18] Firbas, J. (1959a). Thoughts on the communicative function of the verb in English, German and Czech, Brno studies in English 1.39—68. (Prague).
[19] Firbas, J. (1959b). More thoughts on the communicative function of the English verb, Sborník prací filosofické fakulty brněnské university A7.74—98 (Brno).
[20] Firbas, J. (1961). On the communicative value of the modern English finite verb, Brno studies in English 3.79—104 (Prague).
[21] Firbas, J. (1964a). On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.267—80 (Prague).
[22] Firbas, J. (1964b). From comparative word-order studies, Brno studies in English 4.111—28 (Prague).
[23] Firbas, J. (1965). A note on transition proper in functional sentence analysis, Philologica Pragensia 8.170—76 (Prague).
[24] Firbas, J. (1966). Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.239—56 (Prague).
[25] Firbas, J. (1968). On the prosodic features of the English finite verb as means of functional sentence perspective, Brno studies in English 7.11—48 (Brno).
[26] Firbas, J . (1969). On the prosodic features of the Modern English verb-object combination as means of functional sentence perspective, Brno studies in English 8.49—59 (Brno).
[27] Fodor, J. D. (1970). Formal linguistics and formal logic. New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, pp. 198—214.
[28] Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100.25—50.
[29] Halliday, M. A. K. (1970a). Language structure and language function, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 140—65.
[30] Halliday, M. A. K. (1970b). Functional diversity in language, paper read to the Yale Linguistic Club 1970.
[31] Halliday, M. A. K. (1969). Options and functions in the English clause, Brno studies in English 8.81—88 (Brno).
[32] Hausenblas, K. (1964), On the characterization and classification of discourses, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.67—83 (Prague).
[33] Horálek, K. (1967). Filosofie jazyka [Philosophy of language], Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Philologica Monographia 15 (Prague).
[34] Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1970), The perception and memory of sentences, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 261—70.
[35] Kemeny, J. G. (1956). A new approach to semantics, The journal of symbolic logic 21: 1.1—27. | DOI 10.2307/2268481
[36] Kiparsky, P. (1970). Historical linguistics, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 302-315.
[37] Kirkwood, H. W. (1970). Some systemic means of 'Functional sentence perspective' in English and German, IRAL 8:2. (Heidelberg).
[38] Leech, G. N. (1969). Towards a semantic description of English, (London).
[39] Leontjev, A. A. et al. (1968). Teorija rečevoj dejatel'nosti [The theory of speech activity] (Moscow).
[40] Lyons, J. (1969). Introduction to theoretical linguistics (Cambridge).
[41] Lyons, J. (1970). Generative syntax, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 115—39.
[42] Mathesius, V. (1911). On the potentiality of the phenomena of language [Originally published in Czech under the title "O potencionálnosti jevů jazykových", Věstník královské české společnosti nauk, třída filosoficko-historická, sect. 2, Prague]. Republished in Vachek (1964.1—32).
[43] Mathesius, V. (1928). On linguistic characterology with illustrations from Modern English, Proposition, Actes du premier congrés international de linguistes, Leiden. Republished in Vachek (1964.59—67).
[44] Mathesius, V. (1963). On some problems of the systematic analysis of grammar, TCLP 6.95—107. Republished in Vachek (1964.306—19).
[45] Mathesius, V. (1947). Čeština a obecný jazykozpyt [The Czech language and general linguistics] (Prague).
[46] Mathesius, V. (1960) Nebojte se angličtiny [Don't be afraid of English], a university textbook, (Prague).
[47] Mathesius, V. (1961). Obsahový rozbor současné angličtiny na základě obecně lingvistickém [A functional analysis of present day English on a general linguistic basis], edited and annotated by J. Vachek (Prague).
[48] Miller, B. (1972). Tense, negation and possibility, International logic review (ed. F. Spisani), (Bologna), 78—85.
[49] Mleziva, M. (1970). Stavy věcí v logické sémantice [The states of things in logical semantics], Teorie a metoda 2:2.1—14.
[50] Montague, R. (1968). Pragmatics, in Contemporary philosophy (ed. R. Klibansky), (Firenze), 102—21.
[51] Montague, R. (1970). English as a formal language, in Linguaggi nella societa e nella tecnica, edizioni di Communita, (Milan), 189—223.
[52] Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs, University of Chicago.
[53] Neustupný, J. V. (1966). On the analysis of linguistic vagueness, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.39—51 (Prague).
[54] Nickel, G. (1968). Kontextuelle Beziehungen zwischen Sätzen im Englischen, Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts, Heft 1.
[55] Nosek, J. (1964). Notes on syntactic condensation in Modern English, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.281—88 (Prague).
[56] Novák, P. (1966). On the three-level approach to syntax, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.219—23 (Prague).
[57] Ogden, C. K., Richards, I. A. (1923). The meaning of meaning, (London).
[58] Palek, B. (1968). Cross-reference (A study from hyper-syntax), Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Philologica Monographia 15 (Prague).
[59] Poldauf, I. (1962). Strukturalismus a americký deskriptivismus [Structuralism and American descriptivism], Problémy marxistické jazykovědy, 79—110 (Prague).
[60] Poldauf, I. (1967). On lexical limitations to grammatical categories, Prague studies in English 12.7—22 (Prague)
[61] Poldauf, I. (1969). The so-called medio-passive in English, Prague studies in English 13.15—14 (Prague).
[62] Prior, A. (1967). Past, Present and Future, (Oxford).
[63] Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a logical point of view, Harward University Press.
[64] Searle, J. R. (1970). Speech acts, (Cambridge).
[65] Sgall, P. (1967). Functional sentence perspective in a generative description, Prague studies in mathematical linguistics 2.203—25 (Prague).
[66] Sgall, P. et al. (1969). A functional approach to syntax (in generative description of language), (New York).
[67] Šípoš, I. (1966). Pokus o empirickou analýzu sémantické neurčitosti některých slovních kategorií [An attempt at an empirical analysis of the semantic vagueness of some word categories], Studia Psychologica, Vol. 8, 4.286—305.
[68] Šmilauer, V. (1966). Novočeská skladba [Syntax of Modern Czech], (Prague).
[69] Tichý, P. (1969). Intension in terms of Turing machines, Studia logica 14.7—25.
[70] Tichý, P. (1971). An approach to intensional analysis, Noûs 5: No 3. 273—97. | DOI 10.2307/2214668
[71] Thorne, J. P. (1970). Generative grammar and stylistic analysis, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 185—97.
[72] Tondl, L. (1970). Sign, in Scientific thought, UNESCO.
[73] Trnka, B. (1964). On the linguistic sign and the multilevel organization of language, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.33—40 (Prague).
[74] Trnka, B. (1968). On word order in structural linguistics, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 3.47—51 (Prague).
[75] Vachek, J. (1958). Notes on the development of language seen as a system of systems, Sborník prací filosofické fakulty brněnské university A 3.94—106 (Brno).
[76] Vachek, J. (1959). Two chapters on written English, Brno studies in English 1.7—38 (Prague).
[77] Vachek, J., Firbas, J. (1962). Lingvistická charakteristika současné angličtiny [Linguistic characterology of contemporary English], (Prague).
[78] Vachek, J. (ed.) (1964). A Prague School reader (Bloomington).
[79] Vachek, J. (ed.) (1966). The linguistic school of Prague (Bloomington).
[80] Žolkovskij, A. K., Mel'čuk, I. A. (1967). O semantičeskom sintěze [On the semantic synthesis], Problemy kibernětiki 19.177—238 (Moscow).
[81] Žolkovskij, A. K., Mel'čuk, I. A. (1969). K postrojeniju dějstvujuščej modeli "smysl ←→ těkst" [On construing the dynamic model 'meaning ←→ text'], Mašinnyj perevod i prikladnaja lingvistika 11.5—35 (Moscow).
[2] Ajdukiewicz, K. (1965). Logika pragmatyczna (Warszawa).
[3] Apresjan, Ju. D. (1967). Eksperimental'noje issledovanije semantiki russkogo glagola [The experimental investigation of the semantics of the Russian verb] (Moscow).
[4] Bierwisch, M. (1970). Semantics, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 166—184.
[5] Bolinger, D. (1967), Adjectives in English: attribution and predication, Lingua, vol. 18 1.1—34 (Amsterdam). | DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(67)90018-6
[6] Bolinger, D. (1969). Categories, features, attributes, Brno Studies in English 8.37—41 (Brno).
[7] Bott, M. F. (1970). Computational linguistics, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 215—228.
[8] Campbell, R., Wales, B. (1970) The study of language acquisition, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 242—260.
[9] Chomsky, N., Miller, G. A. (1963) Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages, in R. D. Luce, R. Bush, E. Galanter (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology 2.269—322 (New York).
[10] Chomsky, N. (1968). Deep structures, surface structures and semantic interpretations, mimeographed.
[11] Church, A. (1956). Introduction to mathematical logic, vol. 1 (Princeton, New Yersey).
[12] Curry, H. B. (1961). Some logical aspects of grammatical structure, Proceedings in applied mathematics, vol. 12.56—68 (Providence).
[13] Dahl, Ö. (1971). Tenses and world-states, Gothenburg papers in theoretical linguistics 6 (Gothenburg).
[14] Daneš, F. (1964). A three-level approach to syntax, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.225—240 (Prague).
[15] Daneš, F. (1966). The relation of centre and periphery as a language universal, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.9—21 (Prague).
[16] Daneš, F. (1971). On linguistic strata (levels), Travaux linguistiques de Prague 4.127—43 (Prague).
[17] Dušková, L. (1972). The passive voice in Czech and English, Philologica Pragensia 15.93—118 (Prague).
[18] Firbas, J. (1959a). Thoughts on the communicative function of the verb in English, German and Czech, Brno studies in English 1.39—68. (Prague).
[19] Firbas, J. (1959b). More thoughts on the communicative function of the English verb, Sborník prací filosofické fakulty brněnské university A7.74—98 (Brno).
[20] Firbas, J. (1961). On the communicative value of the modern English finite verb, Brno studies in English 3.79—104 (Prague).
[21] Firbas, J. (1964a). On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.267—80 (Prague).
[22] Firbas, J. (1964b). From comparative word-order studies, Brno studies in English 4.111—28 (Prague).
[23] Firbas, J. (1965). A note on transition proper in functional sentence analysis, Philologica Pragensia 8.170—76 (Prague).
[24] Firbas, J. (1966). Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.239—56 (Prague).
[25] Firbas, J. (1968). On the prosodic features of the English finite verb as means of functional sentence perspective, Brno studies in English 7.11—48 (Brno).
[26] Firbas, J . (1969). On the prosodic features of the Modern English verb-object combination as means of functional sentence perspective, Brno studies in English 8.49—59 (Brno).
[27] Fodor, J. D. (1970). Formal linguistics and formal logic. New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, pp. 198—214.
[28] Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100.25—50.
[29] Halliday, M. A. K. (1970a). Language structure and language function, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 140—65.
[30] Halliday, M. A. K. (1970b). Functional diversity in language, paper read to the Yale Linguistic Club 1970.
[31] Halliday, M. A. K. (1969). Options and functions in the English clause, Brno studies in English 8.81—88 (Brno).
[32] Hausenblas, K. (1964), On the characterization and classification of discourses, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.67—83 (Prague).
[33] Horálek, K. (1967). Filosofie jazyka [Philosophy of language], Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Philologica Monographia 15 (Prague).
[34] Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1970), The perception and memory of sentences, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 261—70.
[35] Kemeny, J. G. (1956). A new approach to semantics, The journal of symbolic logic 21: 1.1—27. | DOI 10.2307/2268481
[36] Kiparsky, P. (1970). Historical linguistics, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 302-315.
[37] Kirkwood, H. W. (1970). Some systemic means of 'Functional sentence perspective' in English and German, IRAL 8:2. (Heidelberg).
[38] Leech, G. N. (1969). Towards a semantic description of English, (London).
[39] Leontjev, A. A. et al. (1968). Teorija rečevoj dejatel'nosti [The theory of speech activity] (Moscow).
[40] Lyons, J. (1969). Introduction to theoretical linguistics (Cambridge).
[41] Lyons, J. (1970). Generative syntax, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 115—39.
[42] Mathesius, V. (1911). On the potentiality of the phenomena of language [Originally published in Czech under the title "O potencionálnosti jevů jazykových", Věstník královské české společnosti nauk, třída filosoficko-historická, sect. 2, Prague]. Republished in Vachek (1964.1—32).
[43] Mathesius, V. (1928). On linguistic characterology with illustrations from Modern English, Proposition, Actes du premier congrés international de linguistes, Leiden. Republished in Vachek (1964.59—67).
[44] Mathesius, V. (1963). On some problems of the systematic analysis of grammar, TCLP 6.95—107. Republished in Vachek (1964.306—19).
[45] Mathesius, V. (1947). Čeština a obecný jazykozpyt [The Czech language and general linguistics] (Prague).
[46] Mathesius, V. (1960) Nebojte se angličtiny [Don't be afraid of English], a university textbook, (Prague).
[47] Mathesius, V. (1961). Obsahový rozbor současné angličtiny na základě obecně lingvistickém [A functional analysis of present day English on a general linguistic basis], edited and annotated by J. Vachek (Prague).
[48] Miller, B. (1972). Tense, negation and possibility, International logic review (ed. F. Spisani), (Bologna), 78—85.
[49] Mleziva, M. (1970). Stavy věcí v logické sémantice [The states of things in logical semantics], Teorie a metoda 2:2.1—14.
[50] Montague, R. (1968). Pragmatics, in Contemporary philosophy (ed. R. Klibansky), (Firenze), 102—21.
[51] Montague, R. (1970). English as a formal language, in Linguaggi nella societa e nella tecnica, edizioni di Communita, (Milan), 189—223.
[52] Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs, University of Chicago.
[53] Neustupný, J. V. (1966). On the analysis of linguistic vagueness, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.39—51 (Prague).
[54] Nickel, G. (1968). Kontextuelle Beziehungen zwischen Sätzen im Englischen, Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts, Heft 1.
[55] Nosek, J. (1964). Notes on syntactic condensation in Modern English, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.281—88 (Prague).
[56] Novák, P. (1966). On the three-level approach to syntax, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.219—23 (Prague).
[57] Ogden, C. K., Richards, I. A. (1923). The meaning of meaning, (London).
[58] Palek, B. (1968). Cross-reference (A study from hyper-syntax), Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Philologica Monographia 15 (Prague).
[59] Poldauf, I. (1962). Strukturalismus a americký deskriptivismus [Structuralism and American descriptivism], Problémy marxistické jazykovědy, 79—110 (Prague).
[60] Poldauf, I. (1967). On lexical limitations to grammatical categories, Prague studies in English 12.7—22 (Prague)
[61] Poldauf, I. (1969). The so-called medio-passive in English, Prague studies in English 13.15—14 (Prague).
[62] Prior, A. (1967). Past, Present and Future, (Oxford).
[63] Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a logical point of view, Harward University Press.
[64] Searle, J. R. (1970). Speech acts, (Cambridge).
[65] Sgall, P. (1967). Functional sentence perspective in a generative description, Prague studies in mathematical linguistics 2.203—25 (Prague).
[66] Sgall, P. et al. (1969). A functional approach to syntax (in generative description of language), (New York).
[67] Šípoš, I. (1966). Pokus o empirickou analýzu sémantické neurčitosti některých slovních kategorií [An attempt at an empirical analysis of the semantic vagueness of some word categories], Studia Psychologica, Vol. 8, 4.286—305.
[68] Šmilauer, V. (1966). Novočeská skladba [Syntax of Modern Czech], (Prague).
[69] Tichý, P. (1969). Intension in terms of Turing machines, Studia logica 14.7—25.
[70] Tichý, P. (1971). An approach to intensional analysis, Noûs 5: No 3. 273—97. | DOI 10.2307/2214668
[71] Thorne, J. P. (1970). Generative grammar and stylistic analysis, New horizons in linguistics (ed. J. Lyons), Penguin Books, 185—97.
[72] Tondl, L. (1970). Sign, in Scientific thought, UNESCO.
[73] Trnka, B. (1964). On the linguistic sign and the multilevel organization of language, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.33—40 (Prague).
[74] Trnka, B. (1968). On word order in structural linguistics, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 3.47—51 (Prague).
[75] Vachek, J. (1958). Notes on the development of language seen as a system of systems, Sborník prací filosofické fakulty brněnské university A 3.94—106 (Brno).
[76] Vachek, J. (1959). Two chapters on written English, Brno studies in English 1.7—38 (Prague).
[77] Vachek, J., Firbas, J. (1962). Lingvistická charakteristika současné angličtiny [Linguistic characterology of contemporary English], (Prague).
[78] Vachek, J. (ed.) (1964). A Prague School reader (Bloomington).
[79] Vachek, J. (ed.) (1966). The linguistic school of Prague (Bloomington).
[80] Žolkovskij, A. K., Mel'čuk, I. A. (1967). O semantičeskom sintěze [On the semantic synthesis], Problemy kibernětiki 19.177—238 (Moscow).
[81] Žolkovskij, A. K., Mel'čuk, I. A. (1969). K postrojeniju dějstvujuščej modeli "smysl ←→ těkst" [On construing the dynamic model 'meaning ←→ text'], Mašinnyj perevod i prikladnaja lingvistika 11.5—35 (Moscow).