Název: Analýza prostorových sloves s inkorporací lokativních argumentů v češtině
Variantní název:
- On location and locatum verbs in Czech
Zdrojový dokument: Linguistica Brunensia. 2018, roč. 66, č. 1, s. 49-62
Rozsah
49-62
-
ISSN1803-7410 (print)2336-4440 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/LB2018-1-5
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/138233
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
This paper investigates a class of Czech denominal spatial verbs, which are formed by incorporation. Examples include verbs such as ustájit (koně) 'to put a horse in the stable, lit. to stable a horse', vytapetovat (pokoj) 'to decorate the room with wallpaper, lit. to wallpare the room'. The goal is to characterize the verbs by means of the cognitively-semantic notions of Figure and Ground. I show that these notions create a bifurcation of such verbs into two classes depending on which category the incorporated noun belongs to. The collected data are classified further by a number of tests.
Note
Příspěvek vznikl s podporou projektu GA17-10144S, PI: Pavel Caha.
Reference
[1] Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[2] Biskup, Petr. 2015. On (Non-)Compositionality of Prefixed Verbs. In: Dočekal, Mojmír – Caha, Pavel – Ziková, Markéta, eds., Slavic Languages in the Perspective of Formal Grammar: Proceedings of FDSL 10.5, Brno 2014. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, s. 59–78.
[3] Bleotu, Adina Camelia. 2014. Location, Locatum Verbs, and the Locative Alternation in English and Romanian. Wiener Linguistische Gazette. Special Issue 78A, s. 178–197.
[4] Caha, Pavel – Ziková, Markéta. 2016. Vowel length as evidence for a distinction between free and bound prefixes in Czech. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 63(3), s. 331–377. | DOI 10.1556/064.2016.63.3.3
[5] Clark, Eve – Clark, Herbert. 1977. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55, s. 767–811. | DOI 10.2307/412745
[6] De Swart, Henriëtte – Zwarts, Joost. 2009. Less form – more meaning: Why bare singular nouns are special. In: Geber, Dana et al., eds., Lingua. Special Issue Noun Incorporation and its Kind 119(2), s. 280–295. | DOI 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.015
[7] Grepl, Miroslav – Karlík, Petr. 1998. Skladba češtiny. Olomouc: Votobia.
[8] Hale, Kenneth – Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1993. On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations. In: Hale, Kenneth – Keyser, Samuel Jay, eds., The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, s. 53–109.
[9] Hale, Kenneth – Keyser, Samuel Jay. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[10] Hirschová, Milada. 1977. Vzájemné vztahy předpon a předložek ve vazbách s prostorovým významem. Slovo a slovesnost 38(2), s. 107–111.
[11] Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. Remarks on Denominal Verbs. In: Alsina, Alex et al., eds., Argument Structure. Stanford: CSLI, s. 1–26.
[12] Křen, Michal a kol. 2015. SYN2015: reprezentativní korpus psané češtiny. Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha. Dostupný z: http://www.korpus.cz.
[13] Mateau, Jaume. 2001. On the Relational Semantics of Transitive Denominal Verbs. In: Escandell-Vidal, Victoria et al., eds., Current Issues in Generative Grammar. Alcalá de Henares: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alcalá, pp. 143–164.
[14] Medová, Lucie – Taraldsen, Tarald. 2007. The Czech Locative Chameleon. Nordlyd 34, s. 200–238.
[15] Plháková, Alena. 2004. Učebnice obecné psychologie. Praha: Academia.
[16] Romanova, Eugenia. 2006. Constructing Perfectivity in Russian. Tromsø. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Tromsø.
[17] Svenonius, Peter. 2010. Spatial P in English. In: Cinque, Guglielmo – Rizzi, Luigi, eds., Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, New York: Oxford University Press, s. 127–160.
[18] Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Figure and Ground in Language. In Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 311–344. Dostupný z: http://wings.buffalo.edu/linguistics/people/faculty/talmy/talmyweb/Volume1/chap5.pdf.
[2] Biskup, Petr. 2015. On (Non-)Compositionality of Prefixed Verbs. In: Dočekal, Mojmír – Caha, Pavel – Ziková, Markéta, eds., Slavic Languages in the Perspective of Formal Grammar: Proceedings of FDSL 10.5, Brno 2014. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, s. 59–78.
[3] Bleotu, Adina Camelia. 2014. Location, Locatum Verbs, and the Locative Alternation in English and Romanian. Wiener Linguistische Gazette. Special Issue 78A, s. 178–197.
[4] Caha, Pavel – Ziková, Markéta. 2016. Vowel length as evidence for a distinction between free and bound prefixes in Czech. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 63(3), s. 331–377. | DOI 10.1556/064.2016.63.3.3
[5] Clark, Eve – Clark, Herbert. 1977. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55, s. 767–811. | DOI 10.2307/412745
[6] De Swart, Henriëtte – Zwarts, Joost. 2009. Less form – more meaning: Why bare singular nouns are special. In: Geber, Dana et al., eds., Lingua. Special Issue Noun Incorporation and its Kind 119(2), s. 280–295. | DOI 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.015
[7] Grepl, Miroslav – Karlík, Petr. 1998. Skladba češtiny. Olomouc: Votobia.
[8] Hale, Kenneth – Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1993. On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations. In: Hale, Kenneth – Keyser, Samuel Jay, eds., The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, s. 53–109.
[9] Hale, Kenneth – Keyser, Samuel Jay. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[10] Hirschová, Milada. 1977. Vzájemné vztahy předpon a předložek ve vazbách s prostorovým významem. Slovo a slovesnost 38(2), s. 107–111.
[11] Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. Remarks on Denominal Verbs. In: Alsina, Alex et al., eds., Argument Structure. Stanford: CSLI, s. 1–26.
[12] Křen, Michal a kol. 2015. SYN2015: reprezentativní korpus psané češtiny. Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha. Dostupný z: http://www.korpus.cz.
[13] Mateau, Jaume. 2001. On the Relational Semantics of Transitive Denominal Verbs. In: Escandell-Vidal, Victoria et al., eds., Current Issues in Generative Grammar. Alcalá de Henares: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alcalá, pp. 143–164.
[14] Medová, Lucie – Taraldsen, Tarald. 2007. The Czech Locative Chameleon. Nordlyd 34, s. 200–238.
[15] Plháková, Alena. 2004. Učebnice obecné psychologie. Praha: Academia.
[16] Romanova, Eugenia. 2006. Constructing Perfectivity in Russian. Tromsø. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Tromsø.
[17] Svenonius, Peter. 2010. Spatial P in English. In: Cinque, Guglielmo – Rizzi, Luigi, eds., Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, New York: Oxford University Press, s. 127–160.
[18] Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Figure and Ground in Language. In Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 311–344. Dostupný z: http://wings.buffalo.edu/linguistics/people/faculty/talmy/talmyweb/Volume1/chap5.pdf.