Název: Srovnání přístupu dvou biskupů při vyšetřování hereze v Coventry v letech 1486–1522
Variantní název:
- The comparison of two bishops' approaches in the investigations of heresy in Coventry in 1486–1522
Zdrojový dokument: Sacra. 2019, roč. 17, č. 1, s. 7-16
Rozsah
7-16
-
ISSN1214-5351 (print)2336-4483 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/142429
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
This study focuses on the records from the episcopal investigations of the Lollard heresy in Coventry between the years 1486 and 1522. However, my aim was not to analyse the dissident opinions of the suspects but to discern the specific approaches of the bishops John Hales and Geoffrey Blyth from the Coventry and Lichfield diocese and show how these approaches affected the resulting records. That means finding the so-called "excesses of speech" which show information beyond the often formulaic and standardised documents. The study shows that the bishops Hales and Blyth had quite differing interests in mind while investigating heresy. Hales focused on the details of the abjured opinions, such as the specifics of why the suspect denies the efficacy of pilgrimages. Blyth's primary goal, on the other hand, was to root out the heresy in Coventry and find as many heretics as he could.
Reference
[1] Lollards of Coventry 1486-1522. S. McSheffrey & N. Tanner (Eds.) (2003). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[2] The Visitations of the County of Devon: Comprising the Heralds' Visitations of 1531, 1564 & 1620. J. L. Vivian (Ed.) (1895). Exeter: Henry S. Eland.
[3] Arnold, J. H. (2001). Inquisition and Power: Catharism and the Confessing Subject in Medieval Languedoc. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
[4] Arnold, J. H. (2004). Lollard Trials and Inquisitorial Discourse. In Ch. Given-Wilson (Ed.), Fourteenth Century England II (pp. 81–94). Woodbridge: Boydell Press.
[5] Bruschi, C. (2009). The Wandering Heretics of Languedoc. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[6] Grundmann, H. (1965). Ketzerverhöre des Spätmittelalters als quellenkritisches Problem. Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters, 21, 519–575.
[7] Hornbeck, J. P. (2010). What is a Lollard? Dissent and Belief in Late Medieval England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[8] Justice, S. (1994). Inquisition, Speech, and Writing: A Case from Late-Medieval Norwich. Representations, 48, 1–29. | DOI 10.1525/rep.1994.48.1.99p0245n
[9] Lutton, R. (2006). Lollardy and Orthodox Religion in Pre-Reformation England: Reconstructing Piety. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
[10] Zbíral, D. (2012). Inkviziční záznamy jako pramen historického bádání: Možnosti, omezení, strategie čtení. Dějiny – teorie – kritika, 9(2), 193–229.
[2] The Visitations of the County of Devon: Comprising the Heralds' Visitations of 1531, 1564 & 1620. J. L. Vivian (Ed.) (1895). Exeter: Henry S. Eland.
[3] Arnold, J. H. (2001). Inquisition and Power: Catharism and the Confessing Subject in Medieval Languedoc. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
[4] Arnold, J. H. (2004). Lollard Trials and Inquisitorial Discourse. In Ch. Given-Wilson (Ed.), Fourteenth Century England II (pp. 81–94). Woodbridge: Boydell Press.
[5] Bruschi, C. (2009). The Wandering Heretics of Languedoc. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[6] Grundmann, H. (1965). Ketzerverhöre des Spätmittelalters als quellenkritisches Problem. Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters, 21, 519–575.
[7] Hornbeck, J. P. (2010). What is a Lollard? Dissent and Belief in Late Medieval England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[8] Justice, S. (1994). Inquisition, Speech, and Writing: A Case from Late-Medieval Norwich. Representations, 48, 1–29. | DOI 10.1525/rep.1994.48.1.99p0245n
[9] Lutton, R. (2006). Lollardy and Orthodox Religion in Pre-Reformation England: Reconstructing Piety. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
[10] Zbíral, D. (2012). Inkviziční záznamy jako pramen historického bádání: Možnosti, omezení, strategie čtení. Dějiny – teorie – kritika, 9(2), 193–229.