Název: Interpretative potentiality as a natural phenomenon within the theory of functional sentence perspective
Zdrojový dokument: Brno studies in English. 2008, roč. 34, č. 1, s. [9]-22
Rozsah
[9]-22
-
ISSN1211-1791
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/104253
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
Within research carried out in the field of the theory of functional sentence perspective (FSP), the question of potentiality in interpretation seems to play a marginal role. The paper deals with the treatment of the issue from a synchronic point of view, focusing on the position of potentiality in FSP analysis. The author draws above all on the findings presented by Mathesius and Firbas and presents the results of his own investigation into the issue of potentiality in FSP. The discussion is illustrated by authentic examples of cases of potentiality in functional interpretation (namely in the biblical passage of Matthew 5:1-12) and by suggested solutions.
Note
Název článku v tištěném obsahu: Potentiality as a natural phenomenon within functional syntax
Reference
[1] Adam, Martin (2003) 'Poetic religious text and FSP'. Brno Studies in English 29: 43–49.
[2] Adam, Martin (2005) 'Who is who: functional pressure of the dynamic-semantic tracks'. In: Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga and Renata Povolná (eds.) Discourse and Interaction 1. Proceedings from Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 7–14.
[3] Adam, Martin (2006) 'The Question of Potentiality in the Theory of Functional Sentence Perspective'. In: Drápela, Martin and Jan Vomlela (eds.) Silesian Studies in English 2006. Proceedings from the International Conference of English and American Studies. Opava: Slezská univerzita, 1–11.
[4] Chamonikolasová, Jana (2005) 'Dynamic semantic scales in the theory of functional sentence perspective'. In Aleg(r)ace pro Evu. Papers in Honour of Eva Hajičová, 61–67.
[5] Chamonikolasová, Jana and Martin Adam (2005) 'The Presentation Scale in the Theory of Functional Sentence Perspective'. In: Čermák, Jan et al. (eds.) Patterns (A Festschrift for Libuše Dušková). Praha: Filozofická fakulta Univerziy Karlovy, 59–69.
[6] Čermák, František (1994) Jazyk a jazykověda. Přehled. Praha: Pražská imaginace.
[7] Černý, Jiří (1996) Dějiny lingvistiky. Olomouc: Votobia.
[8] Firbas, Jan (1961) 'On the communicative value of the English verb'. Brno Studies in English 3: 79–104.
[9] Firbas, Jan (1964) 'On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis'. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1: 267–280.
[10] Firbas, Jan (1986) 'On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of functional sentence perspective'. In: Cooper, Ch. R. and S. Greenbaum (eds.) Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches (Written Communication Annual 1). Beverly Hills: Sage, 40–71.
[11] Firbas, Jan (1992) Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Firbas, Jan (1995) 'On the thematic and the rhematic layers of a text'. In: Warwik, Tauskanen and Hiltunen (eds.) Organization in Discourse: Proceedings from the Turku Conference, Anglicana Turkuensia 14: 59–72.
[13] Green, J. P. (ed.) (1996) Interlinear Greek-English New Testament. Michigan: Baker Books.
[14] Heidegger, Martin (1971) On the way to language (translated by P.D. Hertz). San Francisco: Harper Collins Publishers.
[15] Kohlenberger, J. Robert (ed.) (1997) The Contemporary Parallel New Testament. New York: Oxford University Press.
[16] Mathesius, Vilém (1945) 'Krása jazyka' [The Beauty of Language]. Možnosti, které čekají. Praha: Jan Leichter.
[17] Mathesius, Vilém (1982 [1911]) 'O potenciálnosti jevů jazykových' [On the Potentiality of Language Phenomena]. Jazyk, kultura, slovesnost, 9–28.
[18] Svoboda, Aleš (2005) 'Firbasian semantic scales and comparative studies'. In: Čermák, Jan et al. (eds.) Patterns (A Festschrift for Libuše Dušková), Praha: Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, 217–229.
[19] Urbanová, Ludmila (2005) 'Some methodological remarks on current trends in linguistic research'. In: Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga and Renata Povolná (eds.) Discourse and Interaction 1, Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 119–124.
[20] Vachek, Josef (1970) U základů pražské jazykovědné školy. Praha: Academia.
[21] Whorf, Benjamin Lee (1956) Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[2] Adam, Martin (2005) 'Who is who: functional pressure of the dynamic-semantic tracks'. In: Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga and Renata Povolná (eds.) Discourse and Interaction 1. Proceedings from Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 7–14.
[3] Adam, Martin (2006) 'The Question of Potentiality in the Theory of Functional Sentence Perspective'. In: Drápela, Martin and Jan Vomlela (eds.) Silesian Studies in English 2006. Proceedings from the International Conference of English and American Studies. Opava: Slezská univerzita, 1–11.
[4] Chamonikolasová, Jana (2005) 'Dynamic semantic scales in the theory of functional sentence perspective'. In Aleg(r)ace pro Evu. Papers in Honour of Eva Hajičová, 61–67.
[5] Chamonikolasová, Jana and Martin Adam (2005) 'The Presentation Scale in the Theory of Functional Sentence Perspective'. In: Čermák, Jan et al. (eds.) Patterns (A Festschrift for Libuše Dušková). Praha: Filozofická fakulta Univerziy Karlovy, 59–69.
[6] Čermák, František (1994) Jazyk a jazykověda. Přehled. Praha: Pražská imaginace.
[7] Černý, Jiří (1996) Dějiny lingvistiky. Olomouc: Votobia.
[8] Firbas, Jan (1961) 'On the communicative value of the English verb'. Brno Studies in English 3: 79–104.
[9] Firbas, Jan (1964) 'On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis'. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1: 267–280.
[10] Firbas, Jan (1986) 'On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of functional sentence perspective'. In: Cooper, Ch. R. and S. Greenbaum (eds.) Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches (Written Communication Annual 1). Beverly Hills: Sage, 40–71.
[11] Firbas, Jan (1992) Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Firbas, Jan (1995) 'On the thematic and the rhematic layers of a text'. In: Warwik, Tauskanen and Hiltunen (eds.) Organization in Discourse: Proceedings from the Turku Conference, Anglicana Turkuensia 14: 59–72.
[13] Green, J. P. (ed.) (1996) Interlinear Greek-English New Testament. Michigan: Baker Books.
[14] Heidegger, Martin (1971) On the way to language (translated by P.D. Hertz). San Francisco: Harper Collins Publishers.
[15] Kohlenberger, J. Robert (ed.) (1997) The Contemporary Parallel New Testament. New York: Oxford University Press.
[16] Mathesius, Vilém (1945) 'Krása jazyka' [The Beauty of Language]. Možnosti, které čekají. Praha: Jan Leichter.
[17] Mathesius, Vilém (1982 [1911]) 'O potenciálnosti jevů jazykových' [On the Potentiality of Language Phenomena]. Jazyk, kultura, slovesnost, 9–28.
[18] Svoboda, Aleš (2005) 'Firbasian semantic scales and comparative studies'. In: Čermák, Jan et al. (eds.) Patterns (A Festschrift for Libuše Dušková), Praha: Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, 217–229.
[19] Urbanová, Ludmila (2005) 'Some methodological remarks on current trends in linguistic research'. In: Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga and Renata Povolná (eds.) Discourse and Interaction 1, Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 119–124.
[20] Vachek, Josef (1970) U základů pražské jazykovědné školy. Praha: Academia.
[21] Whorf, Benjamin Lee (1956) Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.