The problem of ridicule in Henry Fielding's Joseph Andrews

Název: The problem of ridicule in Henry Fielding's Joseph Andrews
Zdrojový dokument: Brno studies in English. 2018, roč. 44, č. 2, s. [91]-104
  • ISSN
    0524-6881 (print)
    1805-0867 (online)
Type: Článek
Licence: Neurčená licence

Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.

Starting his career as a provocative dramatist, generally criticised for open political satire and indecency of his plays, Henry Fielding developed into one of the most prominent eighteenth-century novelist and had to work hard to build a reputation which would correspond with the newly developing sensibilities of the reading audiences. The article considers the transition in Fielding's career in the context of changing demands on politeness in society and provides analysis of his first novel, Joseph Andrews, which links his technique of the true ridiculous to William Hogarth's fight against sham values and Lord Shaftesbury's idea of freedom of laughter. It also explains how this method helped Fielding create consciously ambiguous characters and make profound moral statements while keeping the possibility to entertain his readers through comedy.
[1] Armstrong, Nancy (1987) Desire and Domestic Fiction. London: Oxford University Press.

[2] Battestin, Martin C. (1989) A Life. London: Routledge.

[3] Bell, Ian A. (1994) Authorship and Authority. London: Longman Publishing.

[4] Campbell, Jill (1995) Natural Masques. Standford: Stanford University Press.

[5] Carter, Philip (2001) Men and the Emergence of Polite Society. Harlow: Pearson.

[6] Dickie, Simon (2011) The Cruelty of Laughter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[7] Elkin. P.K. (1973) The Augustan Defence of Satire. London: Oxford University Press.

[8] Fielding, Henry (1967) Joseph Andrews. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

[9] Fielding, Henry (2010) Shamela. Project Gutenberg. E-book.

[10] Grean, Stanley (1967) Shaftesbury's Philosophy of Religion and Ethics. Ohio: Ohio University Press.

[11] Hume Robert (2010) Fielding at 300: Elusive, confusing, misappropriated, or (perhaps) obvious?. Modern Philology 108(2): 224–262., accessed on 1 February, 2014. | DOI 10.1086/657591

[12] Hunter, J. Paul (1975) Occasional Form. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

[13] Irwin, W.R. (1946) Satire and comedy in the works of Henry Fielding. ELH 13(3): 168–188., accessed on 9 February 2019 | DOI 10.2307/2871437

[14] Johnson, Maurice (1961) Fielding's Art of Fiction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

[15] Klein, Lawrence E. (1989) Liberty, manners and politeness in early eighteenth-century England'. The Historical Journal 32(3): 583–605., accessed on 5 March, 2017. | DOI 10.1017/S0018246X00012437

[16] Marshall, Ashley (2011) Henry Fielding and the Scriblerians. Modern Language Quarterly 72(1): 19–48.

[17] McKeon, Michael (1987) The Origins of the English Novel 1600–1740. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

[18] Ong, Walter J. (1977) Interfaces of the Word. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

[19] Paulson, Ronald (1967) Satire and the Novel in Eighteenth-century England. New Haven: London University Press.

[20] Paulson, Ronald and Thomas Lockwood (1969) Henry Fielding: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge.

[21] Raven, James (1987) British Fiction, 1750–1770: A Chronological Check-List. University of Delaware Press.

[22] Rawson, Claude (1985) Order From Confusion Sprung. New Jersey: Humanities Press.

[23] Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper (1900) Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, etc. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[24] Smallwood, Angela (1989) Fielding and the Woman Question: the Novels of Henry Fielding and Feminist Debate 1700–1750. New York: St Martin's Press.

[25] Voogd, Peter Jan de (1981) Correspondences of the Arts. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

[26] Watt, Ian (1957) The Rise of the Novel. Berkeley: University of California Press.