Název: Invectiva e identidad en los discursos de oratoria de Cicerón : análisis del locus de la 'infirmitas ingeni'
Variantní název:
- Invective and identity in Cicero's oratory speeches : analysis of the 'infirmitas ingeni' locus
Zdrojový dokument: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2023, roč. 28, č. 1, s. 5-17
Rozsah
5-17
-
ISSN1803-7402 (print)2336-4424 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/GLB2023-1-1
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/digilib.78216
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 International
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
The aim of this paper is to examine in Cicero's oratory speeches the criticisms of his opponents regarding either their lack of erudition or their poor intellectual abilities. From our viewpoint, this original locus of invective is closely linked to the consolidation of a new intellectual nobilitas at the end of the Roman Republic and is especially relevant in the context of Cicero's return from exile.
Note
Este artículo se ha relizado en el marco del plan de trabajo que llevo adelante como investigadora adjunta del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (Conicet). Asimismo se vincula con el Proyecto Proyecto de Investigación bianual para investigadores asistentes y adjuntos (PIBAA) "Reflexiones en torno a la identidad romana en textos de Cicerón: religión, filosofía y política a fines de la República" financiado por Conicet en la convocatoria 2022–2023.
Reference
[1] Arena, V. (2007). Roman Oratorical Invective. In W. Dominik, & J. Hall (Eds.), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric (pp. 149–160). Oxford: Blackwell.
[2] Beard, M., North, J., & Price, S. (1998). Religions of Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Clark, A. (Ed.). (1908). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Pro Sex. Roscio. De Imperio Cn. Pompei. Pro Cluentio. In Catilinam. Pro Murena. Pro Caelio. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[4] Clark, A. (Ed.). (1909). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Pro P. Quinctio, Pro. Q. Roscio comoedo, Pro A. Caecina, De lege agraria contra Rullum, Pro C. Rabiro perduellionis reo, Pro L. Flacco, In L. Pisonem, Pro C. Rabiro Postumo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[5] Clark, A. (Ed.). (1909). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Pro Tullio. Pro Fonteio. Pro Sulla. Pro Archia. Pro Plancio. Pro Scauro. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[6] Clark, A. (Ed.). (1909). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Cum Senatui gratias egit. Cum populo gratias egit. De domo sua. De haruspicum responso. Pro Sestio. In Vatinium. De provinciis consularibus. Pro Balbo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[7] Clark, A. (Ed.). (1918). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Pro Milone. Pro Marcello. Pro Ligario. Pro rege Deiotaro. Philippicae I–XIV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[8] Corbeill, A. (1996). Controlling Laughter. Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[9] Corbeill, A. (2002). Ciceronian Invective. In J. M. May (Ed.), Brill's Companion to Cicero. Oratory and Rhetoric (pp. 197–217). Leiden: Brill.
[10] Corbeill, A. (2013). Cicero and the Intellectual Milieu of the Late Republic. In C. Steel (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (pp. 9–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[11] Craig, C. (2004). Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof. In J. Powell, & J. Paterson (Eds.), Cicero the Advocate (pp. 187–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[12] Dench, E. (2013). Cicero and Roman Identity. In C. Steel (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (pp. 122–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Dugan, J. (2009). Rhetoric and the Roman Republic. In E. Gunderson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric (pp. 178–193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14] Gruen, E. (1974). The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[15] Habinek, T. (2005). Ancient Rhetoric and Oratory. Oxford: Blackwell.
[16] Hölkeskamp, K. (2010). Self-Serving Sermons: Oratory and the Self-Construction of the Republican Aristocrat. In C. Smith, & R. Covino (Eds.), Praise and Blame in Roman Republic Rhetoric (pp. 17–34). Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.
[17] Hubbell, H. M. (Transl.). (1949). M. T. Cicero: De Inventione, De Optimo Genere Oratorum, Topica. London: Heinemann.
[18] Kelly, G. (2006). A History of Exile in the Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[19] Moatti, C. (1988). Tradition et raison chez Cicéron: l'emergence de la rationalité politique à la fin de la République romaine. Mélanges de l'École française de Rome – Antiquité, 100(1), 385–430.
[20] Moatti, C. (2015). The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome (transl. J. Lloyd). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (primera edición en francés: 1997).
[21] Nisbet, R. G. M. (Ed.). (1961). M. Tulli Ciceronis in L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[22] Peterson, W. (Ed.). (1916). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Divinatio in Q. Caecilium. In C. Verrem. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[23] Pina Polo, F. (2010). Frigidus Rumor: The Creation of a (Negative) Public Image in Rome. In A. Turner (Ed.), Private and Public Lies: The Discourse of Despotism and Deceit in the Graeco-Roman World (pp. 75–90). Leiden: Brill.
[24] Powell, J. G. F. (2007). Invective and the Orator: Ciceronian Theory and Practice. In J. Booth (Ed.), Cicero on the Attack. Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond (pp. 1–24). Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.
[25] Rawson, E. (1985). Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Londres: Duckworth.
[26] Riggsby, A. M. (2002). The Post Reditum Speeches. In J. M. May (Ed.), Brill's Companion to Cicero. Oratory and Rhetoric (pp. 159–195). Leiden: Brill.
[27] Rüpke, J. (2012). Religion in Republican Rome. Rationalization and Ritual Change. Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
[28] Schniebs, A. (2002). El estado soy yo: salus rei publicae e identidad en Cicerón. Minerva, 16, 107–117.
[29] Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (Ed.). (1977). M. T. Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares, II: 47–43 B.C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[30] Van der Blom, H. (2010). Cicero's Role Models. The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[31] Volk, K. (2021). The Roman Republic of Letters. Scholarship, Philosophy, and Politics in the Age of Cicero and Caesar. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[32] Woolf, R. (2015). Cicero. The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic. Abingdon: Routledge.
[2] Beard, M., North, J., & Price, S. (1998). Religions of Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Clark, A. (Ed.). (1908). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Pro Sex. Roscio. De Imperio Cn. Pompei. Pro Cluentio. In Catilinam. Pro Murena. Pro Caelio. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[4] Clark, A. (Ed.). (1909). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Pro P. Quinctio, Pro. Q. Roscio comoedo, Pro A. Caecina, De lege agraria contra Rullum, Pro C. Rabiro perduellionis reo, Pro L. Flacco, In L. Pisonem, Pro C. Rabiro Postumo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[5] Clark, A. (Ed.). (1909). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Pro Tullio. Pro Fonteio. Pro Sulla. Pro Archia. Pro Plancio. Pro Scauro. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[6] Clark, A. (Ed.). (1909). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Cum Senatui gratias egit. Cum populo gratias egit. De domo sua. De haruspicum responso. Pro Sestio. In Vatinium. De provinciis consularibus. Pro Balbo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[7] Clark, A. (Ed.). (1918). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Pro Milone. Pro Marcello. Pro Ligario. Pro rege Deiotaro. Philippicae I–XIV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[8] Corbeill, A. (1996). Controlling Laughter. Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[9] Corbeill, A. (2002). Ciceronian Invective. In J. M. May (Ed.), Brill's Companion to Cicero. Oratory and Rhetoric (pp. 197–217). Leiden: Brill.
[10] Corbeill, A. (2013). Cicero and the Intellectual Milieu of the Late Republic. In C. Steel (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (pp. 9–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[11] Craig, C. (2004). Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof. In J. Powell, & J. Paterson (Eds.), Cicero the Advocate (pp. 187–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[12] Dench, E. (2013). Cicero and Roman Identity. In C. Steel (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (pp. 122–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Dugan, J. (2009). Rhetoric and the Roman Republic. In E. Gunderson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric (pp. 178–193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14] Gruen, E. (1974). The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[15] Habinek, T. (2005). Ancient Rhetoric and Oratory. Oxford: Blackwell.
[16] Hölkeskamp, K. (2010). Self-Serving Sermons: Oratory and the Self-Construction of the Republican Aristocrat. In C. Smith, & R. Covino (Eds.), Praise and Blame in Roman Republic Rhetoric (pp. 17–34). Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.
[17] Hubbell, H. M. (Transl.). (1949). M. T. Cicero: De Inventione, De Optimo Genere Oratorum, Topica. London: Heinemann.
[18] Kelly, G. (2006). A History of Exile in the Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[19] Moatti, C. (1988). Tradition et raison chez Cicéron: l'emergence de la rationalité politique à la fin de la République romaine. Mélanges de l'École française de Rome – Antiquité, 100(1), 385–430.
[20] Moatti, C. (2015). The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome (transl. J. Lloyd). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (primera edición en francés: 1997).
[21] Nisbet, R. G. M. (Ed.). (1961). M. Tulli Ciceronis in L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[22] Peterson, W. (Ed.). (1916). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Divinatio in Q. Caecilium. In C. Verrem. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[23] Pina Polo, F. (2010). Frigidus Rumor: The Creation of a (Negative) Public Image in Rome. In A. Turner (Ed.), Private and Public Lies: The Discourse of Despotism and Deceit in the Graeco-Roman World (pp. 75–90). Leiden: Brill.
[24] Powell, J. G. F. (2007). Invective and the Orator: Ciceronian Theory and Practice. In J. Booth (Ed.), Cicero on the Attack. Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond (pp. 1–24). Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.
[25] Rawson, E. (1985). Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Londres: Duckworth.
[26] Riggsby, A. M. (2002). The Post Reditum Speeches. In J. M. May (Ed.), Brill's Companion to Cicero. Oratory and Rhetoric (pp. 159–195). Leiden: Brill.
[27] Rüpke, J. (2012). Religion in Republican Rome. Rationalization and Ritual Change. Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
[28] Schniebs, A. (2002). El estado soy yo: salus rei publicae e identidad en Cicerón. Minerva, 16, 107–117.
[29] Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (Ed.). (1977). M. T. Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares, II: 47–43 B.C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[30] Van der Blom, H. (2010). Cicero's Role Models. The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[31] Volk, K. (2021). The Roman Republic of Letters. Scholarship, Philosophy, and Politics in the Age of Cicero and Caesar. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[32] Woolf, R. (2015). Cicero. The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic. Abingdon: Routledge.