Název: "A crowd of Gorgons and winged horses" : a critique of Socratic philosophers in Athenaeus' The Deipnosophists
Zdrojový dokument: Pro-Fil. 2023, roč. 24, č. 1, s. 34-46
Rozsah
34-46
-
ISSN1212-9097 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/pf23-1-33931
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/digilib.79833
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International
Přístupová práva
otevřený přístup
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
The study analyses the critique of the Socratic philosophers in Athenaeus' The Deipnosophists. The main goal of the study is to assess its overall quality, argumentative structure, historical relevance and interpretative plausibility. The first part of the study briefly outlines the main characteristics and features of the anti-philosophical literature in antiquity. The second part examines Athenaeus' argumentative methods and techniques of textual criticism. In the following parts of the study, we scrutinise Athenaeus's overall critical assessment of Socratic literature and compare it with extant philosophical, biographical and doxographical evidence. In conclusion, we answer the question of to what extent is Athenaeus' critique relevant and substantiated by available textual evidence.
Note
The paper was supported by grant VEGA č. 1/0020/21 Vývoj pojmu hanby v antickej a súčasnej morálnej filozofii s dôrazom na jej etické funkcie [Development of the concept of shame in ancient and contemporary moral philosophy with emphasis on its ethical functions].
Reference
[1] Bicknell, P. J. (1974): Socrates' Mistress Xanhippe. Apeiron 8(1), 1–6.
[2] Casanova, A. (2019): Philosophy. In: Sommerstein, A. H. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Greek Comedy, Hoboken, Medford: John Wiley & Sons, 707–709.
[3] Cepko, J. – Kalaš, A. – Suvák, V. (2021): Ako sa stala Hipparchia z Maróneie slávnou filozofkou (historicko-filozofická interpretácia fragmentu SSR V I 1), Studia philosophica 68(1), 7–27.
[4] Düring, I. (1941): Herodicus the Cratetean. A Study in Anti-platonic Tradition, Oxon, New York: Taylor & Francis.
[5] Filonik, J. (2013): Athenian Impiety Trials: A Reappraisal, Dike 16, 11–96.
[6] Fitton, J. W. (1970): That was no lady, that was..., The Classical Quarterly 20(1), 56–66.
[7] D' Hoine, P. – Roskam, G. – Schorn, S. – Verheyden, J. (eds.) (2021): Polemics and Networking in Graeco-Roman Antiquity, Turnhout: Brepols 2021.
[8] Jacob, Ch. (2013): The Web of Athenaeus, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[9] Chroust, A.-H. (1957): Socrates. Man and Myth, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[10] Chroust, A.-H. (1962): Plato's Detractors in Antiquity, The Review of Metaphysics 16(1), 98–118.
[11] Chroust, A.-H. (1973): Socrates. Man and Myth, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[12] Kalaš, A. (2016): Diogenov postoj k ľudskej sexualite: hedonizmus, alebo asketizmus? in Filozofia 71(2), 119–130.
[13] Keuls, E. (1985): The Reign of the Phallus, Berkeley: University of California Press.
[14] Kapparis, K. (2018): Prostitution in the Ancient Greek World, Berlin, Boston: Walter De Gruyter.
[15] Konstantakos I. M. (2020): The Characters of Doric Comedy, in: Fries, A., Kanellakis, D. (eds.) Ancient Greek Comedy. Genre – Texts – Reception, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 7–28.
[16] Maier, H. (1913): Sokrates. Sein Werk und seine geschichtliche Stellung, Tübingen: Verlag J. B. C. Mohr.
[17] Mansfeld, J. – Runia, D. (2009): Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxo-grapher, Leiden, Boston: Brill.
[18] Montuori, M. (1981): Socrates. Physiology of a Myth, Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.
[19] Press, G. A. (2012): Charmides, in: Press, G. A. (ed.) The Continuum Companion to Plato, London, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 41–44.
[20] Rowett, C. (2014): The Pythagorean society and politics, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.) A History of Pythagoreanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 112–130.
[21] Schorn, S. (2012): Aristoxenus' Biographical Method, in: Huffman, C. A. (ed.) Aristoxenus of Tarentum: Discussion, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 177–207.
[22] Suvák, V. (2010): Antisthenés: Praktický charakter sókratovskej etiky, Filozofia 65 (3), 239–248.
[23] Suvák, V. (2022): Aristotelés o Sókratovi a "logoi Sókratikoi", Filosofický časopis 70(1), 115–137.
[24] Weisser, S., Thaler, N. (2016): Strategies of Polemics in Greek and Roman Philosophy, Leiden, Boston: Brill.
[25] Wollner, U. (2010): Starosť o seba v Platónovom dialógu Gorgias, Filozofia 65(3), 227–238.
[26] Woolf, R. (2002): Consistency and Akrasia in Plato's Protagoras, Phronesis 47(3), 224–252.
[27] Woodbury, L. (1973): Socrates and the Daughter of Aristides, Phoenix 27(1), 7–25.
[28] Zelinová, Z. (2018): Význam ženských postáv v sókratovskej filozofii, Ostium 14(3).
[29] Zelinová, Z. (2021): Umenie čítať ľudský charakter v sókratovskej filozofii, Ostium 17(1).
[30] Zhmud, L. (2017): Heraclitus on Pythagoras, in: Fantino, E. – Muss, U. – Schubert, C. – Sier, K. (eds.) Heraklit im Kontext, Berlin: De Gruyter, 171–186.
[2] Casanova, A. (2019): Philosophy. In: Sommerstein, A. H. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Greek Comedy, Hoboken, Medford: John Wiley & Sons, 707–709.
[3] Cepko, J. – Kalaš, A. – Suvák, V. (2021): Ako sa stala Hipparchia z Maróneie slávnou filozofkou (historicko-filozofická interpretácia fragmentu SSR V I 1), Studia philosophica 68(1), 7–27.
[4] Düring, I. (1941): Herodicus the Cratetean. A Study in Anti-platonic Tradition, Oxon, New York: Taylor & Francis.
[5] Filonik, J. (2013): Athenian Impiety Trials: A Reappraisal, Dike 16, 11–96.
[6] Fitton, J. W. (1970): That was no lady, that was..., The Classical Quarterly 20(1), 56–66.
[7] D' Hoine, P. – Roskam, G. – Schorn, S. – Verheyden, J. (eds.) (2021): Polemics and Networking in Graeco-Roman Antiquity, Turnhout: Brepols 2021.
[8] Jacob, Ch. (2013): The Web of Athenaeus, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[9] Chroust, A.-H. (1957): Socrates. Man and Myth, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[10] Chroust, A.-H. (1962): Plato's Detractors in Antiquity, The Review of Metaphysics 16(1), 98–118.
[11] Chroust, A.-H. (1973): Socrates. Man and Myth, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[12] Kalaš, A. (2016): Diogenov postoj k ľudskej sexualite: hedonizmus, alebo asketizmus? in Filozofia 71(2), 119–130.
[13] Keuls, E. (1985): The Reign of the Phallus, Berkeley: University of California Press.
[14] Kapparis, K. (2018): Prostitution in the Ancient Greek World, Berlin, Boston: Walter De Gruyter.
[15] Konstantakos I. M. (2020): The Characters of Doric Comedy, in: Fries, A., Kanellakis, D. (eds.) Ancient Greek Comedy. Genre – Texts – Reception, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 7–28.
[16] Maier, H. (1913): Sokrates. Sein Werk und seine geschichtliche Stellung, Tübingen: Verlag J. B. C. Mohr.
[17] Mansfeld, J. – Runia, D. (2009): Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxo-grapher, Leiden, Boston: Brill.
[18] Montuori, M. (1981): Socrates. Physiology of a Myth, Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.
[19] Press, G. A. (2012): Charmides, in: Press, G. A. (ed.) The Continuum Companion to Plato, London, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 41–44.
[20] Rowett, C. (2014): The Pythagorean society and politics, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.) A History of Pythagoreanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 112–130.
[21] Schorn, S. (2012): Aristoxenus' Biographical Method, in: Huffman, C. A. (ed.) Aristoxenus of Tarentum: Discussion, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 177–207.
[22] Suvák, V. (2010): Antisthenés: Praktický charakter sókratovskej etiky, Filozofia 65 (3), 239–248.
[23] Suvák, V. (2022): Aristotelés o Sókratovi a "logoi Sókratikoi", Filosofický časopis 70(1), 115–137.
[24] Weisser, S., Thaler, N. (2016): Strategies of Polemics in Greek and Roman Philosophy, Leiden, Boston: Brill.
[25] Wollner, U. (2010): Starosť o seba v Platónovom dialógu Gorgias, Filozofia 65(3), 227–238.
[26] Woolf, R. (2002): Consistency and Akrasia in Plato's Protagoras, Phronesis 47(3), 224–252.
[27] Woodbury, L. (1973): Socrates and the Daughter of Aristides, Phoenix 27(1), 7–25.
[28] Zelinová, Z. (2018): Význam ženských postáv v sókratovskej filozofii, Ostium 14(3).
[29] Zelinová, Z. (2021): Umenie čítať ľudský charakter v sókratovskej filozofii, Ostium 17(1).
[30] Zhmud, L. (2017): Heraclitus on Pythagoras, in: Fantino, E. – Muss, U. – Schubert, C. – Sier, K. (eds.) Heraklit im Kontext, Berlin: De Gruyter, 171–186.