Název: On the Latin aspectual system : a case study of the verb amāre
Zdrojový dokument: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2024, roč. 29, č. 1, s. 169-190
Rozsah
169-190
-
ISSN1803-7402 (print)2336-4424 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/GLB2024-1-9
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/digilib.80002
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 International
Přístupová práva
otevřený přístup
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
This article falls within the field of studies of the aspect-tense system of Latin. It is a case study that deals specifically with the use and meanings of the pf. act. indicative and the impf. act. indicative of the verb amāre 'to love', which is seen as the prototypical verb for the category of stative (or non-dynamic) verbs. Using this verb as an example, this paper attempts to show that the lexical-semantic classification of verbs proposed by Vendler (1957) and still widely used today – albeit after various modifications – is not entirely suitable for Latin. The aim of this paper is thus not to report on how one particular verb (amāre) behaves, but rather to point out the methodological problems in the existing account of Latin aspect, which not only needs to be much more rigorously based on the description of the interrelations between grammatical devices and the lexical semantics of verbs, but also must work with a much more refined classification than that at the level of +/− dynamicity, +/− telicity, etc.
Note
This study was supported by the European Regional Development Fund project "Beyond Security: Role of Conflict in Resilience-Building" (reg. no.: CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004595).
Reference
[1] Bull, W. E. (1960). Time, Tense, and the Verb. A Study in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, with Particular Attention to Spanish. Berkeley – London: University of California Press.
[2] Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. | DOI 10.2307/2273576
[4] Haverling, G. (2000). On -sco verbs, Prefixes and Semantic Functions. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
[5] Haverling, G. (2010). Actionality, tense, and viewpoint. In P. Baldi, & P. Cuzzolin (Eds.), New Perspectives of Historical Latin Syntax (pp. 277–523). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. | DOI 10.1515/9783110215458.277
[6] Hoffmann, J. B., & Szantyr, A. (1965). Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Lateinische Grammatik II. München: Beck.
[7] Kühner, R., & Stegmann, C. (1912). Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache (II. Band: Satzlehre, I. Teil). Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.
[8] Meillet, A. (1897). De l'expression de l'aoriste en latin. Revue de Philologie, 21, 81–90.
[9] Pinkster, H. (1983). Tempus, Aspect and Aktionsart in Latin. In Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 29, I (pp. 270–319). Berlin: De Gruyter.
[10] Pinkster, H. (2015). Oxford Latin Syntax (Vol. 1: The Simple Clause). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[11] Rothmayr, A. (2009). The Structure of Stative Verbs. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
[12] Rothstein, S. (2016). Aspect. In M. Aloni, & P. Dekker (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics (pp. 342–368). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | DOI 10.1017/cbo9781139236157.013
[13] Serbat, G. (1976a). Das Präsens im lateinischen Tempussystem. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung, 90 (1/2), 200–221.
[14] Serbat, G. (1976b). Les temps du verbe en latin. Revue des études latines, 54, 308–352.
[15] Vaníková, M. (2019). Prefix ex- u latinských sloves a jeho aspektová funkce [Thesis]. Prague: Charles University.
[16] Vaníková, M. (2024). Remarks on the Aspect of the Present Tense. In C. Cabrillana (Ed.), Recent Trends and Findings in Latin Linguistics: Volume I: Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics (pp. 113–134). Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter. | DOI 10.1515/9783110722116-007
[17] Vaníková, M. (forthc.). Latin Verbal Prefix in Regard to Aspect. AUC Philologica.
[18] Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and Times. Philosophical Review, 56, 143–160.
[2] Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. | DOI 10.2307/2273576
[4] Haverling, G. (2000). On -sco verbs, Prefixes and Semantic Functions. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
[5] Haverling, G. (2010). Actionality, tense, and viewpoint. In P. Baldi, & P. Cuzzolin (Eds.), New Perspectives of Historical Latin Syntax (pp. 277–523). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. | DOI 10.1515/9783110215458.277
[6] Hoffmann, J. B., & Szantyr, A. (1965). Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Lateinische Grammatik II. München: Beck.
[7] Kühner, R., & Stegmann, C. (1912). Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache (II. Band: Satzlehre, I. Teil). Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.
[8] Meillet, A. (1897). De l'expression de l'aoriste en latin. Revue de Philologie, 21, 81–90.
[9] Pinkster, H. (1983). Tempus, Aspect and Aktionsart in Latin. In Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 29, I (pp. 270–319). Berlin: De Gruyter.
[10] Pinkster, H. (2015). Oxford Latin Syntax (Vol. 1: The Simple Clause). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[11] Rothmayr, A. (2009). The Structure of Stative Verbs. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
[12] Rothstein, S. (2016). Aspect. In M. Aloni, & P. Dekker (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics (pp. 342–368). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | DOI 10.1017/cbo9781139236157.013
[13] Serbat, G. (1976a). Das Präsens im lateinischen Tempussystem. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung, 90 (1/2), 200–221.
[14] Serbat, G. (1976b). Les temps du verbe en latin. Revue des études latines, 54, 308–352.
[15] Vaníková, M. (2019). Prefix ex- u latinských sloves a jeho aspektová funkce [Thesis]. Prague: Charles University.
[16] Vaníková, M. (2024). Remarks on the Aspect of the Present Tense. In C. Cabrillana (Ed.), Recent Trends and Findings in Latin Linguistics: Volume I: Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics (pp. 113–134). Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter. | DOI 10.1515/9783110722116-007
[17] Vaníková, M. (forthc.). Latin Verbal Prefix in Regard to Aspect. AUC Philologica.
[18] Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and Times. Philosophical Review, 56, 143–160.