Název: Changes in the consonant system of Pannonia Inferior, Dalmatia and Venetia et Histria
Zdrojový dokument: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2017, roč. 22, č. 2, s. 165-181
Rozsah
165-181
-
ISSN1803-7402 (print)2336-4424 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/GLB2017-2-9
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/137629
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
This study aims to classify the geographical variants of Vulgar Latin found in the inscriptions of Pannonia Inferior, Dalmatia and Venetia et Histria, and their provincial capitals Aquincum, Salona and Aquileia, based on the changes of their consonant system in order to investigate the possibilities whether a regional dialect area over the Alps–Danube–Adria region of the Roman Empire could have existed as suggested by József Herman. For the analysis, the provincial countryside and the provincial capitals are contrasted to each other as well as to the rest of the Latin speaking provinces of the Roman Empire. The relevant linguistic data are taken from the Computerized Historical Linguistic Database of Latin Inscriptions of the Imperial Age, and the statistical analysis applies the Herman method of calculating the relative distribution of diverse types of non-standard data found in the inscriptions. After the comparison of the phenomena of sonorization, degemination, assimilation and /b/~/w/ fusion between an earlier and later chronological period, a suggested map of dialectal variants of Vulgar Latin in the region will be hypothesized.
Note
The present paper has been prepared within the framework of the project OTKA (Hungarian Scientific Research Fund) No. K 108399 entitled "Computerized Historical Linguistic Database of Latin Inscriptions of the Imperial Age" (see http://lldb.elte.hu/) and of the project entitled "Lendület ('Momentum') Research Group for Computational Latin Dialectology" (Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences).
Reference
[1] Adamik, B. (2012). In Search of the Regional Diversification of Latin: Some Methodological Considerations in Employing the Inscriptional Evidence. In F. Biville et al. (Eds.), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif IX. Actes du IXe colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Lyon, 6–9 septembre 2009 (pp. 123–139). Lyon: Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerrané.
[2] Adamik, B. (2017). On the Vulgar Latin merger of /b/ and /w/ and its correlation with the loss of intervocalic /w/: Dialectological evidence from inscriptions. Pallas, 103, 25–36.
[3] Cravens, T. D. (2002). Comparative historical dialectology: Italo-Romance clues to Ibero-Romance sound change. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
[4] Gonda, A. (2015). Aquincum latin nyelve. In I. Bárány, G. Bolonyai, A. Ferenczi, & Á. Vér (Eds.), Studia Classica (pp. 317–338). Budapest: ELTE.
[5] Herman, J. (1983). Le latin dans les provinces danubiennes de l'Empire romain. Problemes et perspectives de la recherche. In W. Haase (Ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Vol. II, 29, 2; pp. 1089–1106). Berlin: de Gruyter.
[6] Herman, J. (2000a). Vulgar Latin. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
[7] Herman, J. (2000b). Differenze territoriali nel latino parlato dell'Italia tardo-imperiale: un contributo preliminare. In J. Herman, & A. Marinetti (Eds.), La preistoria dell Italiano. Atti della Tavola Rotonda di Linguistica Storica. Università Ca' Foscari di Venezia 11–13 giugno 1998 (pp. 124–135). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
[8] Lloret, M.-R. (2004). The Phonological Role of Paradigms: The case of insular Catalan. In J. Auger, J. C. Clements, & B. Vance (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 33rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 258; pp. 275–298). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[9] Loporcaro, M. (2011). Phonological Processes. In M. Maiden et al. (Eds.), The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages (Vol. I.; pp. 109–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[10] Mócsy, A. (1974). Pannonia and Upper Moesia: A History of the Middle Danube Provinces of the Roman Empire. London – Boston: Routledge & Paul.
[11] Tamás, L. (1983). Einführung in die historisch-vergleichende romanische Sprachwissenschaft. Würzburg: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag A. Lehmann Gerbrunn.
[12] Untermann, J. (1980). Alpen–Donau–Adria. In G. Neumann, & J. Untermann (Eds.), Die Sprachen im römischen Reich der Kaiserzeit (Beihefte der Bonner Jahrbücher, Bd. 40). Köln – Bonn: Habelt.
[13] Väänänen, V. (1981). Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris: Klincksieck.
[2] Adamik, B. (2017). On the Vulgar Latin merger of /b/ and /w/ and its correlation with the loss of intervocalic /w/: Dialectological evidence from inscriptions. Pallas, 103, 25–36.
[3] Cravens, T. D. (2002). Comparative historical dialectology: Italo-Romance clues to Ibero-Romance sound change. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
[4] Gonda, A. (2015). Aquincum latin nyelve. In I. Bárány, G. Bolonyai, A. Ferenczi, & Á. Vér (Eds.), Studia Classica (pp. 317–338). Budapest: ELTE.
[5] Herman, J. (1983). Le latin dans les provinces danubiennes de l'Empire romain. Problemes et perspectives de la recherche. In W. Haase (Ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Vol. II, 29, 2; pp. 1089–1106). Berlin: de Gruyter.
[6] Herman, J. (2000a). Vulgar Latin. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
[7] Herman, J. (2000b). Differenze territoriali nel latino parlato dell'Italia tardo-imperiale: un contributo preliminare. In J. Herman, & A. Marinetti (Eds.), La preistoria dell Italiano. Atti della Tavola Rotonda di Linguistica Storica. Università Ca' Foscari di Venezia 11–13 giugno 1998 (pp. 124–135). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
[8] Lloret, M.-R. (2004). The Phonological Role of Paradigms: The case of insular Catalan. In J. Auger, J. C. Clements, & B. Vance (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 33rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 258; pp. 275–298). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[9] Loporcaro, M. (2011). Phonological Processes. In M. Maiden et al. (Eds.), The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages (Vol. I.; pp. 109–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[10] Mócsy, A. (1974). Pannonia and Upper Moesia: A History of the Middle Danube Provinces of the Roman Empire. London – Boston: Routledge & Paul.
[11] Tamás, L. (1983). Einführung in die historisch-vergleichende romanische Sprachwissenschaft. Würzburg: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag A. Lehmann Gerbrunn.
[12] Untermann, J. (1980). Alpen–Donau–Adria. In G. Neumann, & J. Untermann (Eds.), Die Sprachen im römischen Reich der Kaiserzeit (Beihefte der Bonner Jahrbücher, Bd. 40). Köln – Bonn: Habelt.
[13] Väänänen, V. (1981). Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris: Klincksieck.