Název: The scourges of Homer'. Some remarks on the term Homeromastiges
Zdrojový dokument: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2021, roč. 26, č. 1, s. 53-63
Rozsah
53-63
-
ISSN1803-7402 (print)2336-4424 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/GLB2021-1-4
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/143911
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 International
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
This paper presents an analysis of the occurrences of the nickname Ὁμηρομάστιξ ("Scourge of Homer") in Greek and Latin literature. In the singular form, the term occurs exclusively in reference to Zoilus of Amphipolis, Homeric critic of the 4th century BC and author of Against Homer's Poetry (Κατὰ τῆς Ὁμήρου ποιήσεως). An apparent exception is the use of the nickname referring to Zenodotus of Ephesus, which seems to be due to a scholiast's misunderstanding of Luc. pro Im. 24. The term occurs in the plural form three times. Among these three occurrences, one (Eust. Od. 1.301.29–31 Stallbaum) can be perhaps compared to a fragment of Zoilus' Homeric exegesis (schol. Hdn. vel ex. Il. 1.129a A), and as a result, it is possible to suggest that when Eustathius mentioned the anonymous Ὁμηρομάστιγες he had Zoilus in mind as well.
Reference
[1] Adler, A. (Ed.). (1931). Suidae Lexicon (Vol. 2). Leipzig: Teubner.Buttman, P. (Ed.). (1821). Scholia Antiqua in Homeri Odysseam. Berlin: in Libraria Myliana.
[2] Dindorf, G. (Ed.). (1855). Scholia Graeca in Homeri Odysseam (Vol. I). Oxonii: e typographeo Academico.
[3] Erbse, H. (Ed.). (1969). Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem. Scholia Vetera, 1: Praefationem et scholia ad libros A–Δ continens. Berolini: De Gruyter.
[4] Friedländer, U. (1895). De Zoilo aliisque Homeri obtrectatoribus. Königsberg: ex officina Leupoldiana.
[5] Jacoby, F. (Ed.). (1926). Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker, 2/A: Zeitgeschichte, Universalgeschichte und Hellenika (nr. 64–105). Berlin: Weidmann.
[6] Kühn, C. G. (Ed.). (1825). Claudii Galeni opera omnia (Vol. 10). Leipzig: Knobloch.
[7] Leaf, W. (Ed.). (1900). The Iliad (Vol. 1). London: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Longo, V. (Ed.). (1986). Dialoghi di Luciano (Vol. II). Torino: UTET.
[9] Ludwich, A. (Ed.). (1889). Homeri Odyssea (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Teubner.
[10] Pontani, F. (Ed.). (2020). Scholia Graeca in Odysseam, 4: Scholia ad libros η–θ. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.
[11] Rabe, H. (Ed.). (1906). Scholia in Lucianum. Leipzig: Teubner.
[12] Rackham, H. (Transl.). (1949). Pliny. Natural History. Preface and Books 1–2. Cambridge (Mass.) – London: Harvard University Press.
[13] Stallbaum, G. (Ed.). (1825). Eustathii archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis commentarii ad Homeri Odysseam (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Weigel.
[14] West, M. L. (Ed.). (1998). Homerus: Ilias (Vol. 1). Stuttgardiae – Lipsiae: Teubner.
[15] Williams, M. F. (2013). Zoilos of Amphipolis (71). In I. Worthington (Ed.), Brill’s New Jacoby [retrieved 20.03.2021 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1873-5363_bnj_a71]. | DOI 10.1163/1873-5363_bnj_a71]
[16] Apfel, H. V. (1938). Homeric Criticism in the Fourth Century B.C. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 69, 245–258. | DOI 10.2307/283178
[17] Bishop, C. (2015). Hipparchus Among the Detractors? In C. S. Kraus, & C. Stray (Eds.), Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre (pp. 379–395). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[18] Blass, F. (1874). Attische Beredsamkeit. Zweite Abteilung. Isokrates und Isaios. Hildesheim: Olms.
[19] Bouchard, E. (2016). Du Lycée au Musée. Théorie poétique et critique littéraire à l'époque hellénistique. Paris: PU Paris–Sorbonne.
[20] Cobet, C. G. (1876). Miscellanea critica quibus continentur observationes criticae in scriptores graecos praesertim Homerum et Demosthenem. Lugduni Batavorum: E. J. Brill.
[21] Erbse, H. (1960). Beiträge zur Überlieferung der Iliasscholien. München: C. H. Beck.
[22] Flobert, P. (1986). La théorie du solécisme dans l'antiquité: de la logique à la syntaxe. Revue de philologie, 60, 173–181.
[23] Fraser, P. M. (1970). Aristophanes of Byzantion and Zoilus Homeromastix in Vitruvius. A Note on Vitruvius VII, Praef. 4–9. Eranos, 68, 115–122.
[24] Gärtner, H. (1975). Zoilos (n. 4). In K. Ziegler et al (Eds.), Der kleine Pauly (Vol. 5; col. 1549–1550). München: Druckenmüller.
[25] Gärtner, H. (1978). Zoilus (14). In A. F. Pauly et al. (Eds.), Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft (Suppl. 15; col. 1531–1554). München: Druckenmüller.
[26] Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (2018). Zoïlos d'Amphipolis. In R. Goulet (Ed.), Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques. VII d'Ulpien à Zoticus (pp. 421–436). Paris: CNRS Éditions.
[27] Gudeman, A. (1927). Λύσεις. In A. F. Pauly et al. (Eds.), Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft (Vol. 13; col. 2511–2518). Stuttgart: Metzler.
[28] Heath, M. (2009). Heraclides of Pontus on Homer. In W. W. Fortenbaugh, & E. Pender (Eds.), Heraclides of Pontus. Discussion (pp. 251–272). New Brunswick – London: Transaction Publishers.
[29] Lehrs, K. (1882, 1833). De Aristarchi studiis Homericis. Königsberg: apud S. Hirzelium.
[30] Lougovaya, J., & Ast, R. (2004). Menis and Pelex. Protagoras on Solecism. Classical Quarterly, 54(1), 274–331. | DOI 10.1093/cq/54.1.274-a
[31] Ludwich, A. (1884). Aristarchs homerische Textkritik nach den Fragmenten des Didymos dargestellt und beurtheilt (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Teubner.
[32] Matthaios, S. (2009). Zoilus (1). In H. Cancik, & H. Schneider (Eds.), Brill's New Pauly (Vol. 15; col. 947). Leiden: Brill.
[33] Mayhew, R. (2019). Aristotle's Lost Homeric Problems. Textual Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[34] Novokhatko, A. (2015). Greek Scholarship from its Beginnings to Alexandria. In F. Montanari, S. Matthaios, & A. Rengakos (Eds.), Brill's Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship (Vol. 1; pp. 3–59). Leiden – Boston: Brill.
[35] Novokhatko, A. (2020). Homeric Hermeneutics on the Way from Athens to Alexandria. In P. Finglass, A. Rengakos, & B. Zimmermann (Eds.), More than Homer Knew – Studies on Homer and His Ancient Commentators (pp. 87–146). Berlin – New York: de Gruyter.
[36] Pagani, L. (2015). Language Correctness (Hellenismos) and its Criteria. In F. Montanari, S. Matthaios, & A. Rengakos (Eds.), Brill's Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship (Vol. 2; pp. 798–849). Leiden – Boston: Brill.
[37] Pavlova, A. V. (2019). Arist. Poet. 1461b1–3: a Broad Hint at Zoilus? Philologia Classica, 14(1), 149–154.
[38] Petzl, G. (1969). Antike Diskussionen über die beiden Nekyiai. Meisenheim: Hain.
[39] Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[40] Pilch, S. (1924). De Zoilo Homeri obtrectatore. Eos, 27, 28.
[41] Regali, M. (2015). Zoilus [1]. In Lexicon of Greek Grammarians of Antiquity [retrieved 21.03.2021 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2451-9278_Zoilus_1]. | DOI 10.1163/2451-9278_Zoilus_1]
[42] Sandri, M. G. (2020). Trattati greci su barbarismo e solecismo. Introduzione ed edizione critica. Berlin – Boston: de Gruyter.
[43] Schironi, F. (2018). The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
[44] Weiß, P. (2019). Tod eines Kritikers: Zur Zoilosanekdote bei Vitruv 7. praef. 8–9 und ihrem Nachleben in den Saturnalia des Macrobius. In G. Bitto, & A. Ginestí Rosell (Eds.), Philologie auf zweiter Stufe. Literarische Rezeptionen und Inszenierungen hellenistischer Gelehrsamkeit (pp. 119–132). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
[2] Dindorf, G. (Ed.). (1855). Scholia Graeca in Homeri Odysseam (Vol. I). Oxonii: e typographeo Academico.
[3] Erbse, H. (Ed.). (1969). Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem. Scholia Vetera, 1: Praefationem et scholia ad libros A–Δ continens. Berolini: De Gruyter.
[4] Friedländer, U. (1895). De Zoilo aliisque Homeri obtrectatoribus. Königsberg: ex officina Leupoldiana.
[5] Jacoby, F. (Ed.). (1926). Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker, 2/A: Zeitgeschichte, Universalgeschichte und Hellenika (nr. 64–105). Berlin: Weidmann.
[6] Kühn, C. G. (Ed.). (1825). Claudii Galeni opera omnia (Vol. 10). Leipzig: Knobloch.
[7] Leaf, W. (Ed.). (1900). The Iliad (Vol. 1). London: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Longo, V. (Ed.). (1986). Dialoghi di Luciano (Vol. II). Torino: UTET.
[9] Ludwich, A. (Ed.). (1889). Homeri Odyssea (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Teubner.
[10] Pontani, F. (Ed.). (2020). Scholia Graeca in Odysseam, 4: Scholia ad libros η–θ. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.
[11] Rabe, H. (Ed.). (1906). Scholia in Lucianum. Leipzig: Teubner.
[12] Rackham, H. (Transl.). (1949). Pliny. Natural History. Preface and Books 1–2. Cambridge (Mass.) – London: Harvard University Press.
[13] Stallbaum, G. (Ed.). (1825). Eustathii archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis commentarii ad Homeri Odysseam (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Weigel.
[14] West, M. L. (Ed.). (1998). Homerus: Ilias (Vol. 1). Stuttgardiae – Lipsiae: Teubner.
[15] Williams, M. F. (2013). Zoilos of Amphipolis (71). In I. Worthington (Ed.), Brill’s New Jacoby [retrieved 20.03.2021 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1873-5363_bnj_a71]. | DOI 10.1163/1873-5363_bnj_a71]
[16] Apfel, H. V. (1938). Homeric Criticism in the Fourth Century B.C. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 69, 245–258. | DOI 10.2307/283178
[17] Bishop, C. (2015). Hipparchus Among the Detractors? In C. S. Kraus, & C. Stray (Eds.), Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre (pp. 379–395). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[18] Blass, F. (1874). Attische Beredsamkeit. Zweite Abteilung. Isokrates und Isaios. Hildesheim: Olms.
[19] Bouchard, E. (2016). Du Lycée au Musée. Théorie poétique et critique littéraire à l'époque hellénistique. Paris: PU Paris–Sorbonne.
[20] Cobet, C. G. (1876). Miscellanea critica quibus continentur observationes criticae in scriptores graecos praesertim Homerum et Demosthenem. Lugduni Batavorum: E. J. Brill.
[21] Erbse, H. (1960). Beiträge zur Überlieferung der Iliasscholien. München: C. H. Beck.
[22] Flobert, P. (1986). La théorie du solécisme dans l'antiquité: de la logique à la syntaxe. Revue de philologie, 60, 173–181.
[23] Fraser, P. M. (1970). Aristophanes of Byzantion and Zoilus Homeromastix in Vitruvius. A Note on Vitruvius VII, Praef. 4–9. Eranos, 68, 115–122.
[24] Gärtner, H. (1975). Zoilos (n. 4). In K. Ziegler et al (Eds.), Der kleine Pauly (Vol. 5; col. 1549–1550). München: Druckenmüller.
[25] Gärtner, H. (1978). Zoilus (14). In A. F. Pauly et al. (Eds.), Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft (Suppl. 15; col. 1531–1554). München: Druckenmüller.
[26] Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (2018). Zoïlos d'Amphipolis. In R. Goulet (Ed.), Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques. VII d'Ulpien à Zoticus (pp. 421–436). Paris: CNRS Éditions.
[27] Gudeman, A. (1927). Λύσεις. In A. F. Pauly et al. (Eds.), Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft (Vol. 13; col. 2511–2518). Stuttgart: Metzler.
[28] Heath, M. (2009). Heraclides of Pontus on Homer. In W. W. Fortenbaugh, & E. Pender (Eds.), Heraclides of Pontus. Discussion (pp. 251–272). New Brunswick – London: Transaction Publishers.
[29] Lehrs, K. (1882, 1833). De Aristarchi studiis Homericis. Königsberg: apud S. Hirzelium.
[30] Lougovaya, J., & Ast, R. (2004). Menis and Pelex. Protagoras on Solecism. Classical Quarterly, 54(1), 274–331. | DOI 10.1093/cq/54.1.274-a
[31] Ludwich, A. (1884). Aristarchs homerische Textkritik nach den Fragmenten des Didymos dargestellt und beurtheilt (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Teubner.
[32] Matthaios, S. (2009). Zoilus (1). In H. Cancik, & H. Schneider (Eds.), Brill's New Pauly (Vol. 15; col. 947). Leiden: Brill.
[33] Mayhew, R. (2019). Aristotle's Lost Homeric Problems. Textual Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[34] Novokhatko, A. (2015). Greek Scholarship from its Beginnings to Alexandria. In F. Montanari, S. Matthaios, & A. Rengakos (Eds.), Brill's Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship (Vol. 1; pp. 3–59). Leiden – Boston: Brill.
[35] Novokhatko, A. (2020). Homeric Hermeneutics on the Way from Athens to Alexandria. In P. Finglass, A. Rengakos, & B. Zimmermann (Eds.), More than Homer Knew – Studies on Homer and His Ancient Commentators (pp. 87–146). Berlin – New York: de Gruyter.
[36] Pagani, L. (2015). Language Correctness (Hellenismos) and its Criteria. In F. Montanari, S. Matthaios, & A. Rengakos (Eds.), Brill's Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship (Vol. 2; pp. 798–849). Leiden – Boston: Brill.
[37] Pavlova, A. V. (2019). Arist. Poet. 1461b1–3: a Broad Hint at Zoilus? Philologia Classica, 14(1), 149–154.
[38] Petzl, G. (1969). Antike Diskussionen über die beiden Nekyiai. Meisenheim: Hain.
[39] Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[40] Pilch, S. (1924). De Zoilo Homeri obtrectatore. Eos, 27, 28.
[41] Regali, M. (2015). Zoilus [1]. In Lexicon of Greek Grammarians of Antiquity [retrieved 21.03.2021 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2451-9278_Zoilus_1]. | DOI 10.1163/2451-9278_Zoilus_1]
[42] Sandri, M. G. (2020). Trattati greci su barbarismo e solecismo. Introduzione ed edizione critica. Berlin – Boston: de Gruyter.
[43] Schironi, F. (2018). The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
[44] Weiß, P. (2019). Tod eines Kritikers: Zur Zoilosanekdote bei Vitruv 7. praef. 8–9 und ihrem Nachleben in den Saturnalia des Macrobius. In G. Bitto, & A. Ginestí Rosell (Eds.), Philologie auf zweiter Stufe. Literarische Rezeptionen und Inszenierungen hellenistischer Gelehrsamkeit (pp. 119–132). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.