Title: Can the functional perspective of a spoken sentence be predicted from that of its written counterpart? : an inquiry based on a comparative analysis of J.D. O'Connor's and R. Kingdon's tonetic transcriptions of Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address
Source document: Brno studies in English. 1993, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. [23]-49
Extent
[23]-49
-
ISSN0231-5351
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/104392
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
References
[1] Daneš, F. (1987). 'On Prague School functionalism In linguistics', in Dirven and Fried 1987.3-38.
[2] Dirven, R. and V. Fried, eds. (1987). Functionalism in linguistics (Amsterdam: Benjamins).
[3] Firbas, J. (1987). 'Thoughts on functional sentence perspective, intonation and emotiveness, Part Two', Brno studies in English 17.9-49.
[4] Firbas, J. (1989). 'Degrees of communicative dynamism and degrees of prosodic prominence', Brno studies in English 18.21-66.
[5] Firbas, J. (1992). Functional, sentence perspective in written and spoken communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
[6] Kingdon, R. (1958). English intonation practice (London: Longmans).
[7] Kopečný, F. (1962). Základy české skladby, 2nd ed. (Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství).
[8] O'Connor, J . D. (1971). Advanced phonetic reader (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
[9] O'Connor, J. D. and G. F. Arnold (1973). Intonation of colloquial English, 2nd ed. (London: Longman).
[10] Svoboda, A. (1968). 'The hierarchy of communicative units and fields as illustrated by English attributive constructions', Brno studies in English 7.61-86.
[11] Svoboda, A. (1981). Diatheme (Brno: Masaryk University).
[12] Svoboda, A. (1983). 'Thematic elements', Brno studies in English 15.49-85.
[13] Uhlenbeck, E. M. (1983). 'Linguistics, neither psychology nor sociology', 1983 NIAS lecture (Wassenaar: NIAS).
[14] Vachek, J. (1989). Written language revisited (Amsterdam: Benjamins).
[2] Dirven, R. and V. Fried, eds. (1987). Functionalism in linguistics (Amsterdam: Benjamins).
[3] Firbas, J. (1987). 'Thoughts on functional sentence perspective, intonation and emotiveness, Part Two', Brno studies in English 17.9-49.
[4] Firbas, J. (1989). 'Degrees of communicative dynamism and degrees of prosodic prominence', Brno studies in English 18.21-66.
[5] Firbas, J. (1992). Functional, sentence perspective in written and spoken communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
[6] Kingdon, R. (1958). English intonation practice (London: Longmans).
[7] Kopečný, F. (1962). Základy české skladby, 2nd ed. (Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství).
[8] O'Connor, J . D. (1971). Advanced phonetic reader (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
[9] O'Connor, J. D. and G. F. Arnold (1973). Intonation of colloquial English, 2nd ed. (London: Longman).
[10] Svoboda, A. (1968). 'The hierarchy of communicative units and fields as illustrated by English attributive constructions', Brno studies in English 7.61-86.
[11] Svoboda, A. (1981). Diatheme (Brno: Masaryk University).
[12] Svoboda, A. (1983). 'Thematic elements', Brno studies in English 15.49-85.
[13] Uhlenbeck, E. M. (1983). 'Linguistics, neither psychology nor sociology', 1983 NIAS lecture (Wassenaar: NIAS).
[14] Vachek, J. (1989). Written language revisited (Amsterdam: Benjamins).