Title: Thoughts on functional sentence perspective, intonation and emotiveness
Variant title:
- Úvahy o aktuálním členění, intonaci a emocionálnosti
Source document: Brno studies in English. 1985, vol. 16, iss. 1, pp. 11-47
Extent
11-47
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/104482
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
References
[1] Anderson, J., ed., (1982). Language form and linguistic variation, Papers dedicated to Angus McIntosh (Amsterdam).
[2] Arnold, G. F. and Tooley, Olive M. (1972). Say it with rhytm 3 (London).
[3] Arnold, G. F. See O'Connor, J. D. O. and Arnold, G. F.
[4] Bauer, J. and Grepl, M . (1980). Skladba spisovné češtiny [Syntax of standard Czech] (Prague).
[5] Bolinger, D. L . (1965). Forms of English: accent, morpheme, order (Tokyo and Cambridge, Mass.).
[6] Chamonikolasová, J. (1985). The internal structure, communicative value and prosodic weight of the English object, Brno studies in English 16. 49—61 (Brno).
[7] Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic systems and intonation in English (Cambridge).
[8] Crystal, D. (1975). Advanced conversational English (London).
[9] Daneš, F. (1957). Intonace a věta ve spisovné češtině [Intonation and sentence in standard Czech] (Prague).
[10] Daneš, F. (1964). A three-level approach to syntax, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.225-40 (Prague).
[11] Daneš, F. (1968). Some thoughts on the semantic structure of the sentence, Lingua 21.55 to 69 (Amsterdam). | DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(68)90038-7
[12] Daneš, F. (1984). On Prague School functionalism in linguistics, mimeo, Linguistic agency University of Trier, series A, paper No. 127 (Trier).
[13] Enkvist, N. E. (1980). Marked focus: functions and constraints, in Greenbaum, Leech and Svartvik 1980. 134-52.
[14] Enkvist, N. E. (1982a). Impromptu speech, structure and process, in Enkvist 1982b. 11-31.
[15] Enkvist, N. E. (1982b). Impromptu speech: A symposium (Åbo).
[16] Firbas, J. (1965). A note on transition proper in functional sentence analysis, Philologica Pragensia 8.170—6 (Prague).
[17] Firbas, J. (1968). On the prosodic features of the modem English finite verb as means of functional sentence perspective (More thoughts on transition proper), Brno studies in English 7.11-48 (Brno).
[18] Firbas, J. (1969). On the prosodic features of the modern English finite verb-object combination as means of functional sentence perspective, Brno studies in English 8. 49—59 (Brno).
[19] Firbas, J. (1972). On the interplay of prosodic and non-prosodic means of functional sentence perspective, The Prague School of Linguistics and language teaching, ed. by V. Fried, 77-94 (London).
[20] Firbas, J. (1975a). On the thematic and the non-thematic section of the sentence, in Ringbom 1975. 317-34.
[21] Firbas, J. (1975b). On 'existence/appearance on the scene' in functional sentence perspective, Prague studies in English 16.47—70 (Prague).
[22] Firbas, J. (1976). A study in the functional sentence perspective of the English and the Slavonic interrogative sentence, Brno studies in English 12. 9—56 (Brno).
[23] Firbas, J. (1979). A functional view of 'ordo naturalis', Brno studies in English 13. 29—59 (Brno).
[24] Firbas, J. (1980). Post-intonation-centre prosodic shade in the modern English clause, in Greenbaum, Leech and Svartvik 1980. 125 — 33.
[25] Firbas, J. (1981). Scene and perspective, Brno studies in English 14. 37—79 (Brno).
[26] Firbas, J. (1982). Has every sentence a theme and a rheme? in Anderson 1982. 97 — 116.
[27] Firbas, J. (1983). On some basic issues of the theory of functional sentence perspective (Comments on Alexander Szwedek's critique), Brno studies in English 15. 9—36 (Brno).
[28] Firbas, J. and Golková, E. (1975). An analytical bibliography of Czechoslovak studies in functional sentence perspective (Brno).
[29] Golková, E. (1981). Jan Firbas's publications, Brno studies in English 14. 15—22 (Brno).
[30] Golková, E. See Firbas, J. and Golková, E.
[31] Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. , and Svartvik, J., eds. (1980). Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk (London and New York).
[32] Greenbaum, S. See Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J.
[33] Grepl, M . (1967). Emocionálně motivovaná aktualizace v syntaktické struktuře výpovědi [Emotively motivated cases of foregrounding in the syntactic structure of the utterance] (Brno).
[34] Grepl, M . See Bauer, J. and Grepl, M .
[35] Halliday, M . A. K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English (The Hague).
[36] Halliday, M . A. K. (1970). A course in spoken English: Intonation (London).
[37] Kingdon, R. (1958). Groundwork of English intonation (London).
[38] Leech, G. See Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J.
[39] Leech, G. See Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J.
[40] Mathesius, V. (1975). A functional analysis of present-day English on a general linguistic basis, ed. by J. Vachek and transl. by L. Dušková (Prague).
[41] O'Connor, J. D. O. and Arnold, G. F. (1973). Intonation of colloquial English (London).
[42] Palmer, H. E. (1924). English intonation, with systematic exercises (Cambridge).
[43] Poldauf, I. (1954). Podíl mluvnice a nauky o slovníku na problematice slovesného vidu [Relevance of grammar and lexicology to the problems of verbal aspect], Studie a práce lingvistické 1. 200 — 23 (Prague).
[44] Poldauf, I. and Šprunk, K. (1968). Čestina jazyk cizí [Czech as a foreign language] (Prague).
[45] Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English (London).
[46] Quirk, R. See Svartvik, J. and Quirk, R.
[47] Reichling, A. (1961). Principles and methods of syntax: Cryptoanalytical formalism, Lingua 10. 1 — 17 (Amsterdam). | DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(61)90108-5
[48] Ringbom, H., ed., (1975). Style and text. Studies presented to Nils Erik Enkvist (Stockholm).
[49] Schubiger, M. (1935). The role of intonation in spoken English (Cambridge).
[50] Schubiger, M . (1958). English intonation, its form and function (Tubingen).
[51] Svartvik, J. and Quirk, R., eds. (1980). A corpus of English conversation (Lund).
[52] Svartvik, J. See Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. , and Svartvik, J.
[53] Svartvik, J. See Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. , and Svartvik, J.
[54] Svoboda, A. (1968). The hierarchy of communicative units and fields as illustrated by English attributive constructions, Brno studies in English 7. 49 — 101 (Brno).
[55] Svoboda, A. (1981). Diatheme (Brno).
[56] Svoboda, A. (1983). Thematic elements, Brno studies in English 15. 49—85 (Brno).
[57] Šprunk, K. See Poldauf, I. and Šprunk, K.
[58] Tooley, Olive M. See Arnold, G. F. and Tooley, Olive M.
[59] Uhlenbeck, E. M . (1983). Linguistics: neither psychology nor sociology, 1983 NIAS Uhlenbeck lecture (Wassenaar).
[60] Uhlířová, L . (1982). Na okraj prací o teorii funkční perspektivy větne [Reflections on writings concerning the theory of FSP], Slovo a slovesnost 43. 308 — 16 (Prague).
[61] Vachek, J. (1958). Some notes on the development of language seen as a system of systems, Sborník prací filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity A 6. 94—106 (Brno).
[2] Arnold, G. F. and Tooley, Olive M. (1972). Say it with rhytm 3 (London).
[3] Arnold, G. F. See O'Connor, J. D. O. and Arnold, G. F.
[4] Bauer, J. and Grepl, M . (1980). Skladba spisovné češtiny [Syntax of standard Czech] (Prague).
[5] Bolinger, D. L . (1965). Forms of English: accent, morpheme, order (Tokyo and Cambridge, Mass.).
[6] Chamonikolasová, J. (1985). The internal structure, communicative value and prosodic weight of the English object, Brno studies in English 16. 49—61 (Brno).
[7] Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic systems and intonation in English (Cambridge).
[8] Crystal, D. (1975). Advanced conversational English (London).
[9] Daneš, F. (1957). Intonace a věta ve spisovné češtině [Intonation and sentence in standard Czech] (Prague).
[10] Daneš, F. (1964). A three-level approach to syntax, Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.225-40 (Prague).
[11] Daneš, F. (1968). Some thoughts on the semantic structure of the sentence, Lingua 21.55 to 69 (Amsterdam). | DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(68)90038-7
[12] Daneš, F. (1984). On Prague School functionalism in linguistics, mimeo, Linguistic agency University of Trier, series A, paper No. 127 (Trier).
[13] Enkvist, N. E. (1980). Marked focus: functions and constraints, in Greenbaum, Leech and Svartvik 1980. 134-52.
[14] Enkvist, N. E. (1982a). Impromptu speech, structure and process, in Enkvist 1982b. 11-31.
[15] Enkvist, N. E. (1982b). Impromptu speech: A symposium (Åbo).
[16] Firbas, J. (1965). A note on transition proper in functional sentence analysis, Philologica Pragensia 8.170—6 (Prague).
[17] Firbas, J. (1968). On the prosodic features of the modem English finite verb as means of functional sentence perspective (More thoughts on transition proper), Brno studies in English 7.11-48 (Brno).
[18] Firbas, J. (1969). On the prosodic features of the modern English finite verb-object combination as means of functional sentence perspective, Brno studies in English 8. 49—59 (Brno).
[19] Firbas, J. (1972). On the interplay of prosodic and non-prosodic means of functional sentence perspective, The Prague School of Linguistics and language teaching, ed. by V. Fried, 77-94 (London).
[20] Firbas, J. (1975a). On the thematic and the non-thematic section of the sentence, in Ringbom 1975. 317-34.
[21] Firbas, J. (1975b). On 'existence/appearance on the scene' in functional sentence perspective, Prague studies in English 16.47—70 (Prague).
[22] Firbas, J. (1976). A study in the functional sentence perspective of the English and the Slavonic interrogative sentence, Brno studies in English 12. 9—56 (Brno).
[23] Firbas, J. (1979). A functional view of 'ordo naturalis', Brno studies in English 13. 29—59 (Brno).
[24] Firbas, J. (1980). Post-intonation-centre prosodic shade in the modern English clause, in Greenbaum, Leech and Svartvik 1980. 125 — 33.
[25] Firbas, J. (1981). Scene and perspective, Brno studies in English 14. 37—79 (Brno).
[26] Firbas, J. (1982). Has every sentence a theme and a rheme? in Anderson 1982. 97 — 116.
[27] Firbas, J. (1983). On some basic issues of the theory of functional sentence perspective (Comments on Alexander Szwedek's critique), Brno studies in English 15. 9—36 (Brno).
[28] Firbas, J. and Golková, E. (1975). An analytical bibliography of Czechoslovak studies in functional sentence perspective (Brno).
[29] Golková, E. (1981). Jan Firbas's publications, Brno studies in English 14. 15—22 (Brno).
[30] Golková, E. See Firbas, J. and Golková, E.
[31] Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. , and Svartvik, J., eds. (1980). Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk (London and New York).
[32] Greenbaum, S. See Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J.
[33] Grepl, M . (1967). Emocionálně motivovaná aktualizace v syntaktické struktuře výpovědi [Emotively motivated cases of foregrounding in the syntactic structure of the utterance] (Brno).
[34] Grepl, M . See Bauer, J. and Grepl, M .
[35] Halliday, M . A. K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English (The Hague).
[36] Halliday, M . A. K. (1970). A course in spoken English: Intonation (London).
[37] Kingdon, R. (1958). Groundwork of English intonation (London).
[38] Leech, G. See Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J.
[39] Leech, G. See Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J.
[40] Mathesius, V. (1975). A functional analysis of present-day English on a general linguistic basis, ed. by J. Vachek and transl. by L. Dušková (Prague).
[41] O'Connor, J. D. O. and Arnold, G. F. (1973). Intonation of colloquial English (London).
[42] Palmer, H. E. (1924). English intonation, with systematic exercises (Cambridge).
[43] Poldauf, I. (1954). Podíl mluvnice a nauky o slovníku na problematice slovesného vidu [Relevance of grammar and lexicology to the problems of verbal aspect], Studie a práce lingvistické 1. 200 — 23 (Prague).
[44] Poldauf, I. and Šprunk, K. (1968). Čestina jazyk cizí [Czech as a foreign language] (Prague).
[45] Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English (London).
[46] Quirk, R. See Svartvik, J. and Quirk, R.
[47] Reichling, A. (1961). Principles and methods of syntax: Cryptoanalytical formalism, Lingua 10. 1 — 17 (Amsterdam). | DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(61)90108-5
[48] Ringbom, H., ed., (1975). Style and text. Studies presented to Nils Erik Enkvist (Stockholm).
[49] Schubiger, M. (1935). The role of intonation in spoken English (Cambridge).
[50] Schubiger, M . (1958). English intonation, its form and function (Tubingen).
[51] Svartvik, J. and Quirk, R., eds. (1980). A corpus of English conversation (Lund).
[52] Svartvik, J. See Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. , and Svartvik, J.
[53] Svartvik, J. See Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. , and Svartvik, J.
[54] Svoboda, A. (1968). The hierarchy of communicative units and fields as illustrated by English attributive constructions, Brno studies in English 7. 49 — 101 (Brno).
[55] Svoboda, A. (1981). Diatheme (Brno).
[56] Svoboda, A. (1983). Thematic elements, Brno studies in English 15. 49—85 (Brno).
[57] Šprunk, K. See Poldauf, I. and Šprunk, K.
[58] Tooley, Olive M. See Arnold, G. F. and Tooley, Olive M.
[59] Uhlenbeck, E. M . (1983). Linguistics: neither psychology nor sociology, 1983 NIAS Uhlenbeck lecture (Wassenaar).
[60] Uhlířová, L . (1982). Na okraj prací o teorii funkční perspektivy větne [Reflections on writings concerning the theory of FSP], Slovo a slovesnost 43. 308 — 16 (Prague).
[61] Vachek, J. (1958). Some notes on the development of language seen as a system of systems, Sborník prací filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity A 6. 94—106 (Brno).