Fundamental principles of an onomasiological theory of word-formation in English

Title: Fundamental principles of an onomasiological theory of word-formation in English
Source document: Brno studies in English. 1999, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. [75]-98
  • ISSN
Type: Article
License: Not specified license

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

The paper presents an outline of the fundamental principles of an onomasiological theory of word-formation which departs from the existing lexicalist and transformationalist theories of word-formation in English in a number of essential points. Word-formation is conceived of as an independent component interconnected with the lexical component, and separated from syntax. Word-formation rules generate fully regular and predictable naming units The conception of productivity as a cluster of word-formation types makes it possible to consider word-formation rules as productive as syntactic rules. The idea of the word-formation component that responds to naming needs of a speech community allows for elimination of the overgeneration principle in morphology. Introduction of the so-called Form-to-Meaning-Assignment Principle makes it possible to put all the traditional word-formation processes on a unified basis. The advantages of the outlined theory are illustrated by a series of example.
[1] Allen, Margaret (1979). Morphological Investigations (University of Connecticut, Connecticut: Storrs).

[2] Anderson, Stephen R. (1982). "Where's morphology", Linguistic Inquiry 13.571—612.

[3] Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A-morphous morphology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

[4] Anderson, Stephen R. (1993). "Morphological Theory", in F. J. Newmeyer, ed., 1988.146-191.

[5] Aronoff, Mark (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph I (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

[6] Bauer, Laurie (1979). "Against word-based morphology". Linguistic Inquiry 10,508-9.

[7] Bauer, Laurie (1983). English Word-formation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

[8] Beard, Robert (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology (State University of New York Press, SUNY Series in Linguistics).

[9] Botha, Rudolf P. (1984). Morphological Mechanisms (Oxford: Pergamon Press).

[10] Brekle, Herbert E. (1970). Generative Satzsemantik und transformationelle Syntax im System der englischen Nominalkomposition (München: Fink).

[11] Brekle, Herbert E. and Kastovsky, Dieter, eds. (1977). Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung (Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann).

[12] Bresnan, Joan W., ed. (1982). The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press).

[13] Bybee, Joan L. (1985). Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company). | DOI 10.1075/tsl.9

[14] Carroll, John M. and Tanenhaus, Michael K. (1975). "Prolegomena to a Functional Theory of Word-Formation", in Papers from the parasession on functionalism (Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society).

[15] Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1992). Current Morphology (London and New York: Routledge).

[16] Chomsky, Noam (1970). "Remarks on Nominalization", in R. Jacobs, and P. Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar (Waltham, Mass.:'Ginn).

[17] Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris (1968). The Sound Pattern of English (New York: Harper & Row).

[18] Clark, Eve V. and Clark, Herbert H. (1979). "When Nouns Surface as Verbs", Language, Vol. 55, No. 4.767-811.

[19] Di Sciullo, Anna M. and Williams, Edwin. (1987). On the Definition of Word (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

[20] Dokulil, Miloš (1962). Tvoření slov v češtině I. Teorie odvozování slov (Praha: CAV).

[21] Dokulil, Miloš (1964). "Zum wechselseitigen Verhaltnis zwischen Wortbildung und Syntax", Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.215-224.

[22] Dokulil, Miloš (1968). "Zur Frage der Konversion und verwandter Wortbildungsvorgange und - beziehungen", Travaux linguistiques de Prague 3, 215-239.

[23] Dressier, Wolfgang U. (1977). "Elements of a polycentristic theory of word formation", Wiener Linguistische Gazette 15.13-32.

[24] Evaraert, Martin; Evers, Arnold; Huybregts, Riny; and Trommelen, Mieke, eds. (1988). Morphology and Modularity (Dordrecht: Foris).

[25] Guerssel, Mohand (1983). "A lexical approach to word formation in English", Linguistic Analysis 12.183-243.

[26] Halle, Morris (1973). "Prolegomena to a Theory of Word Formation", Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 4, No 1.3-16.

[27] Horecký, Ján (1960). "Vzťah pojmu a termínu", Jazykovedný časopis 11.97-102.

[28] Horecký, Ján (1962). "K definícii morfémy", Slavica Pragensia 4. Acta Universitatis Carolines. Philologica, 145-149.

[29] Horecký, Ján (1983). Vývin a teória jazyka (Bratislava: SPN).

[30] Horecký, Ján (1994). Semantics of Derived Words. Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Šafarikanae (Prešov).

[31] Jackendoff, Ray S. (1975). "Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon", Language 51.639-671.

[32] Jensen, John T. (1990). Morphology. Word Structure in Generative Grammar (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company). | DOI 10.1075/cilt.70

[33] Kaisse, Ellen and Shaw, Patricia (1985). "n the theory of lexical phonology", Phonology Yearbook 2.1-30.

[34] Kastovsky, Dieter (1969). "Wortbildung und Nullmorphem", Linguistische Berichte 2.1-13.

[35] Kastovsky, Dieter (1977). "Word-formation, or: At the Crossroads of Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and the Lexicon", Folia Linguistica X 1/2.1-33.

[36] Kastovsky, Dieter (1982). Wortbildung und Semantik (Düsseldorf).

[37] Kastovsky, D. (1993). The Place of WF in Grammar: A Historical Survey. ICOLS 1993.

[38] Kastovsky, Dieter (1995a). "Wortbildungssemantik: Ein historischer Lagebericht", in U. Hoinkes, ed., Panorama der Lexikalischen Semantik Thematische Festschrift aus Anlaß des 60. Geburtstags von Horst Geckeler, 385-398 (Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag).

[39] Kastovsky, Dieter (1995b). "The Syntactic Aspects of Word-Formation: Where Are We Today?", in G. Melchers and B. Warren, eds., Studies in Anglistics, 157-169 (Acta Universitatis Stockolmiensis LXXXV).

[40] Kiparsky, Paul (1982). "Lexical morphology and phonology", in Linguistics in the Morning Calm (Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company).

[41] Kiparsky, Paul (1983). "Word formation and the Lexicon", in F. Ingemann, ed., Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, 3-22 (Lawrence: University of Kansas).

[42] Kiparsky, Paul (1985). "Some consequences of Lexical Phonology", Phonology Yearbook 2,85-136.

[43] Lees, Robert B. (1960). The Grammar of English Nominalizations (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press; The Hague: Mouton).

[44] Lees, Robert. B. (1966). "On a transformational analysis of compounds: a reply to Hans Marchand", Indogermanische Forschungen 71.1-13.

[45] Lees, Robert. B. (1970). "Problems in the grammatical analysis of English nominal compounds", in M. Bierwisch and K. E. Heidolph, eds., Progress in Linguistics, 174-186 (The Hague: Mouton).

[46] Lieber, Rochelle (1981). On the Organization of the Lexicon (Bloomington: IULC).

[47] Lieber, Rochelle (1983). "Argument Linking and compounding in English", Linguistic Inquiry 14.251-86.

[48] Lieber, Rochelle (1992). Deconstructing morphology. Word formation in syntactic theory (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).

[49] Marchand, Hans (1960). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation (Wiesbaden).

[50] Marchand, Hans (1965a). "The Analysis of Verbal Nexus Substantives", Indogermanische Forschungen 70.51 -71.

[51] Marchand, Hans. (1965b). "On the analysis of substantive compounds and suffixal derivatives not containing a verbal element", Indogermanische Forschungen 70.117-145.

[52] Marchand, Hans (1974). Studies in Syntax and Word-Formation, edited by D. Kastovsky (Munich: Fink).

[53] Mathesius, Vilém (1975). A Functional Analysis of Present Day English (The Hague: Mouton).

[54] Mohanan, K.P. (1982). Lexical Phonology, PhD. Dissertation (Bloomington: MIT. Indiana University Linguistics Club).

[55] Mohanan, K.P. 1986. The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.

[56] Newmeyer, F., ed., (1988). Linguistics: the Cambridge Survey, Vol. 1: Linguistic Theory: Foundations (Cambridge: CUP).

[57] Pennanen, Esko V. (1966). Contributions to the study of back-formation in English. Acta Academiae Socialis ser. A vol. 4 Julkaisija Yhteiskunnallinen Korkeakoulu Tampere.

[58] Pennanen, Esko V. (1970). Conversion and Zero-Derivation in English. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis ser. A vol. 40.

[59] Pennanen, Esko V. (1972). "Current views of word-formation", Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73.292-308.

[60] Pennanen, Esko V. (1975). "What happens in back-formation?", in E. Hovdhaugen, ed., Papers from the Second Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 216-229 (Oslo).

[61] Pesetsky, David (1985). "Morphology and Logical Form", Linguistic Inquiry 16.193-246.

[62] Roeper, Thomas (1988). "Compound syntax and head movement". Yearbook of Morphology 1.187-228.

[63] Roeper, Thomas and Siegel, Muffy E. A (1978). "A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds", Linguistic Inquiry 9.199-260.

[64] deSaussure, Ferdinand (1989). Kurs obecné lingvistiky (Praha: Odeon).

[65] Scalise, Sergio (1984). Generative Morphology (Dordrecht: Foris).

[66] Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1986). The syntax of words (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press. Third Printing).

[67] Siegel, Dorothy (1979). Topics in English Morphology (New York: Garland).

[68] Spencer, Andrew (1991). Morphological Theory (Oxford: Blackwell).

[69] Sproat, Richard W. (1988). "Bracketing paradoxes, cliticization and other topics: the mapping between syntactic and phonological structure", in Everaert et al., eds., 339-360.

[70] Strauss, Stephen L. (1982). Lexicalist Phonology of English and German (Foris Publications).

[71] Štekauer, Pavol (1992). "On Some Issues of Zero Morpheme in English", Linguistica Pragensia 2.73-87.

[72] Štekauer, Pavol (1994a). "On Productivity in Word-Formation", Linguistica Pragensia 2.67-82.

[73] Štekauer, Pavol (1994b). "Hapax Legomena and Word-Formation", ASA Journal 1.6-9.

[74] Štekauer, Pavol (1996). A Theory of Conversion in English (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang).

[75] Štekauer, Pavol et al. (1997). Getting Beyond the Rules of Language. Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Prešovensis.

[76] Štekauer, P. (forthcoming). An Onomasiological Theory of Word-Formation in English (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

[77] Williams, Edwin (1981a). "On the notions 'lexically related' and 'head of a word'", Linguistic Inquiry 12.245-274.

[78] Williams, Edwin (1981b). "Argument Structure and Morphology", Linguistic Review 1.81-114.

[79] Zimmer, Karl E. (1964). "Affixal Negation in English and Other Languages: An Investigation of Restricted Productivity", Word, Vol. 20., No. 2, Supplement.

[80] Zwicky, Arnold. (1985). "Heads", Journal of Linguistics 21.1-20.