Title: Hra s mytémy : aplikace Lévi-Straussovy strukturální analýzy na japonský mýtus o zmizení slunce
Source document: Sacra. 2011, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 65-73
Extent
65-73
-
ISSN1214-5351 (print)2336-4483 (online)
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/118566
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
Abstract(s)
The article is reflecting application of the famous method of structural analysis by Claude Lévi-Strauss on an old Japanese myth. The French scholar left a monumental work which is a big challenge for every student of anthropology and cultural studies. His specific way of analyzing the myths searches for the universal structure of human thinking. Lévi-Strauss focused especially on the myths of North American Indians where his theory works quite well. What happens if we use his method for a myth from very different cultural area? And what does it tell about Lévi-Strauss's method itself? The myth of god siblings of Amaterasu and Susanoo is usually declared as the explanation of "disappearance of the sun". Could the view of Lévi-Strauss bring something really new?
References
[1] Kodžiki: japonské mýty. 2007. Bratislava: CAD Press.
[2] Antalík, D. 2005. Jak srovnávat nesrovnatelné. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
[3] Breen, J. – Teeuwen, M. 2010. A New History of Shinto. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.
[4] Geertz, C. 2000. Interpretace kultur. Praha: SLON.
[5] Grapard, A. 1991. "Visions of Excess and Excesses of Vision: Women and Transgression in Japanese Myth." Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 18, 3–22. | DOI 10.18874/jjrs.18.1.1991.3-22
[6] Chlup, R. 2009. "Strukturální antropologie včera a dnes: Sto let Claude Lévi-Strausse I." Religio: Revue pro religionistiku 1, 3–37.
[7] Chlup, R. 2009. "Strukturální antropologie včera a dnes: Sto let Claude Lévi-Strausse II." Religio: Revue pro religionistiku 2, 155–185.
[8] Lévi-Strauss, C. 2007 Strukturální antropologie – dvě. Praha: Argo.
[9] Lévi-Strauss, C. 2006. Mythologica I: Syrové a vařené. Praha: Argo.
[10] Ortner, S. B. 1998. "Má se žena k muži jako příroda ke kultuře?" In: Oates-Indruchová, L. Dívčí válka s ideologií. Praha: SLON, 90–114.
[2] Antalík, D. 2005. Jak srovnávat nesrovnatelné. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
[3] Breen, J. – Teeuwen, M. 2010. A New History of Shinto. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.
[4] Geertz, C. 2000. Interpretace kultur. Praha: SLON.
[5] Grapard, A. 1991. "Visions of Excess and Excesses of Vision: Women and Transgression in Japanese Myth." Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 18, 3–22. | DOI 10.18874/jjrs.18.1.1991.3-22
[6] Chlup, R. 2009. "Strukturální antropologie včera a dnes: Sto let Claude Lévi-Strausse I." Religio: Revue pro religionistiku 1, 3–37.
[7] Chlup, R. 2009. "Strukturální antropologie včera a dnes: Sto let Claude Lévi-Strausse II." Religio: Revue pro religionistiku 2, 155–185.
[8] Lévi-Strauss, C. 2007 Strukturální antropologie – dvě. Praha: Argo.
[9] Lévi-Strauss, C. 2006. Mythologica I: Syrové a vařené. Praha: Argo.
[10] Ortner, S. B. 1998. "Má se žena k muži jako příroda ke kultuře?" In: Oates-Indruchová, L. Dívčí válka s ideologií. Praha: SLON, 90–114.