Title: The socially purposeful museum
Source document: Museologica Brunensia. 2015, vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 28-32
Extent
28-32
-
ISSN1805-4722 (print)2464-5362 (online)
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/134745
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
Abstract(s)
The socially purposeful museum is a dynamic, vital institution that has rich relationships with diverse audiences; that nurtures participatory and co-creative practice and is part of people's everyday lives; that seeks to foster progressive social values and, at the same time, is widely recognised as a site for dialogue and debate; that works collaboratively with a range of institutions within and beyond the cultural sector to engender vibrant, inclusive and more just societies. Drawing on recent research by the Research Centre for Museums and Galleries this session will examine how import the socially purposeful museum to contemporary museum practice.
Společensky přínosné muzeum je dynamickou, živou institucí udržující čilé vztahy s různými typy publika, která zároveň podporuje aktivní účast a spolupráci veřejnosti. Je běžnou součástí života lidí, snaží se pěstovat sociální hodnoty a současně poskytuje místo pro dialog a diskusi. Spolupracuje s mnoha různými institucemi z oblasti kultury i mimo ní, a to za účelem vytváření živé, otevřené a spravedlivé společnosti. Na základě nedávných výsledků bádání Výzkumného centra muzeí a galerií se tento příspěvek věnuje otázce, jak začlenit společensky přínosné muzeum do současné muzejní praxe.
References
[1] Buried in the Footnotes: The representation of disabled people in museum and gallery collections. Leicester: Research Centre for Museums and Galleries, 2004.
[2] JANES, Robert R. Museums in a Troubled World: Renewal, Irrelevance or Collapse?. London, New York: Routledge, 2009. 208 p. ISBN 0-203-87745-4.
[3] Rethinking Disability Representation in Museums and Galleries. Leicester: Research Centre for Museums and Galleries, 2008.
[4] O'NEILL, Mark. Essentialism, adaptation and justice: Towards a new epistemology of museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 2006, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 95–116. ISSN 0964-7775. | DOI 10.1080/09647770600302102
[5] CAMERON, Fiona. Moral lessons and reforming agendas: History museums, science museums, contentious topics and contemporary societies. In KNELL, Simon, Suzanne MACLEOD and Sheila WATSON (eds.). Museum Revolutions: How museums change and are changed. London, New York: Routledge, 2007, pp. 330–342. ISBN 0-203-93264-1.
[6] DELIN, Annie. Buried in the footnotes: the absence of disabled people in the collective imagery of our past. In SANDELL, Richard (ed.). Museums, Society, Inequality. London, New York: Routledge, 2002, pp. 84–97. ISBN 0–415–26059-0.
[7] Disability Reframed: Challenging visitor perceptions in the museum. In SANDELL, Richard, Jocelyn DODD and Rosemarie GARLAND-THOMSON (eds.). Re-presenting Disability: Activism and Agency in the Museum. London, New York: Routledge, 2010, pp. 92–111. ISBN 978-0-415-49471-7.
[8] DODD, Jocelyn, Ceri JONES and Richard SANDELL. Trading Zones: Collaborative Ventures in Disability History. In GARDNER, James and Paula HAMILTON (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Public History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
[9] MARSTINE, Janet, Jocelyn DODD and Ceri JONES. Reconceptualizing Museum Ethics for the Twenty-First Century: A View from the Field. In MCCARTHY, Conal (ed.). The International Handbooks of Museum Studies: Museum Practice. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4051-9850-9.
[10] MILLER, Paul, Sophia PARKER and Sarah GILLINSON. Disabilism: How to tackle the last prejudice [online]. London: Demos, 2004 [cit. 2015-01-26]. Available from www: http://www.demos.co.uk/files/disablism.pdf.
[11] SANDELL, Richard. Museums, Prejudice and the Reframing of Difference. London, New York: Routledge, 2007, p. 227. ISBN 0-415-36748-4.
[12] SANDELL, Richard. On ethics, activism and human rights. In MARSTINE, Janet (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics. London, New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 129–145. ISBN 978-0-415-56611-7.
[13] SANDELL, Richard and Jocelyn DODD. Activist Practice. In SANDELL, Richard, Jocelyn Dodd and Rosemarie GARLAND-THOMSON (eds.). Re-presenting Disability: Activism and Agency in the Museum. London, New York: Routledge, 2010, pp. 3–22. ISBN 978-0-415-49471-7.
[14] CAINES, Matthew. Disability arts: cuts, changes and threats – live webchat. The Guardian [online]. 13 November 2014 [cit. 2015-01-26]. Available from www: http://www.theguardian.com/culture-professionals-network/2014/nov/13/disability-arts-cuts-changes-threats-webchat.
[15] FRASER, Mat. Disability out of the box. Arts Professional [online]. 31. 3. 2014 [cit. 2015-01-28]. Available from www: http://www.artsprofessional.co.uk/magazine/272/article/disability-out-box?utm_source=Weekly-Good-Reads&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Disability-out-of-the-box&utm_campaign=3rd-April-2014.
[16] GARDNER, Lyn. Mat Fraser's museum piece challenges us all to bring disability out of the box. The Guardian [online]. 22 January 2014 [cit. 2015-01-28]. Available from www: http://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2014/jan/22/disability-mat-fraser-museum-cabinet-curiosities-theatre?CMP=twt_gu.
[17] RILEY-SMITH, Ben. Hate crimes against disabled people soar to a record level. The Independent [online]. 19 June 2012. [cit. 2015-01-26]. Available from www: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/hate-crimes-against-disabled-people-soar-to-a-record-level-7858841.html.
[18] UK Government. Access to Work [online]. [cit. 2015-01-26]. Available from www: https://www.gov.uk/access-to-work/overview.
[19] UK Government. Independent Living Fund [online]. [cit.2015-01-26]. Available from www: https://www.gov.uk/
[2] JANES, Robert R. Museums in a Troubled World: Renewal, Irrelevance or Collapse?. London, New York: Routledge, 2009. 208 p. ISBN 0-203-87745-4.
[3] Rethinking Disability Representation in Museums and Galleries. Leicester: Research Centre for Museums and Galleries, 2008.
[4] O'NEILL, Mark. Essentialism, adaptation and justice: Towards a new epistemology of museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 2006, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 95–116. ISSN 0964-7775. | DOI 10.1080/09647770600302102
[5] CAMERON, Fiona. Moral lessons and reforming agendas: History museums, science museums, contentious topics and contemporary societies. In KNELL, Simon, Suzanne MACLEOD and Sheila WATSON (eds.). Museum Revolutions: How museums change and are changed. London, New York: Routledge, 2007, pp. 330–342. ISBN 0-203-93264-1.
[6] DELIN, Annie. Buried in the footnotes: the absence of disabled people in the collective imagery of our past. In SANDELL, Richard (ed.). Museums, Society, Inequality. London, New York: Routledge, 2002, pp. 84–97. ISBN 0–415–26059-0.
[7] Disability Reframed: Challenging visitor perceptions in the museum. In SANDELL, Richard, Jocelyn DODD and Rosemarie GARLAND-THOMSON (eds.). Re-presenting Disability: Activism and Agency in the Museum. London, New York: Routledge, 2010, pp. 92–111. ISBN 978-0-415-49471-7.
[8] DODD, Jocelyn, Ceri JONES and Richard SANDELL. Trading Zones: Collaborative Ventures in Disability History. In GARDNER, James and Paula HAMILTON (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Public History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
[9] MARSTINE, Janet, Jocelyn DODD and Ceri JONES. Reconceptualizing Museum Ethics for the Twenty-First Century: A View from the Field. In MCCARTHY, Conal (ed.). The International Handbooks of Museum Studies: Museum Practice. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4051-9850-9.
[10] MILLER, Paul, Sophia PARKER and Sarah GILLINSON. Disabilism: How to tackle the last prejudice [online]. London: Demos, 2004 [cit. 2015-01-26]. Available from www: http://www.demos.co.uk/files/disablism.pdf.
[11] SANDELL, Richard. Museums, Prejudice and the Reframing of Difference. London, New York: Routledge, 2007, p. 227. ISBN 0-415-36748-4.
[12] SANDELL, Richard. On ethics, activism and human rights. In MARSTINE, Janet (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics. London, New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 129–145. ISBN 978-0-415-56611-7.
[13] SANDELL, Richard and Jocelyn DODD. Activist Practice. In SANDELL, Richard, Jocelyn Dodd and Rosemarie GARLAND-THOMSON (eds.). Re-presenting Disability: Activism and Agency in the Museum. London, New York: Routledge, 2010, pp. 3–22. ISBN 978-0-415-49471-7.
[14] CAINES, Matthew. Disability arts: cuts, changes and threats – live webchat. The Guardian [online]. 13 November 2014 [cit. 2015-01-26]. Available from www: http://www.theguardian.com/culture-professionals-network/2014/nov/13/disability-arts-cuts-changes-threats-webchat.
[15] FRASER, Mat. Disability out of the box. Arts Professional [online]. 31. 3. 2014 [cit. 2015-01-28]. Available from www: http://www.artsprofessional.co.uk/magazine/272/article/disability-out-box?utm_source=Weekly-Good-Reads&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Disability-out-of-the-box&utm_campaign=3rd-April-2014.
[16] GARDNER, Lyn. Mat Fraser's museum piece challenges us all to bring disability out of the box. The Guardian [online]. 22 January 2014 [cit. 2015-01-28]. Available from www: http://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2014/jan/22/disability-mat-fraser-museum-cabinet-curiosities-theatre?CMP=twt_gu.
[17] RILEY-SMITH, Ben. Hate crimes against disabled people soar to a record level. The Independent [online]. 19 June 2012. [cit. 2015-01-26]. Available from www: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/hate-crimes-against-disabled-people-soar-to-a-record-level-7858841.html.
[18] UK Government. Access to Work [online]. [cit. 2015-01-26]. Available from www: https://www.gov.uk/access-to-work/overview.
[19] UK Government. Independent Living Fund [online]. [cit.2015-01-26]. Available from www: https://www.gov.uk/