Title: English left-peripheral constructions from an LFG perspective
Source document: Linguistica Brunensia. 2017, vol. 65, iss. 1, pp. 67-80
Extent
67-80
-
ISSN1803-7410 (print)2336-4440 (online)
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/136658
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
Abstract(s)
This paper investigates the syntactic and information-structural properties of certain English constructions where some discourse-prominent element is located left-peripherally: Topicalization, Clause-initial adjuncts and Left-dislocation. I show that these structures have different syntactic and information-structural properties which may be adequately represented in Lexical Functional Grammar.
Note
This research was supported by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH), grant No. K 111918.
References
[1] Asudeh, Ash. 2011. Towards a unified theory of resumption. In: Rouveret, Alain, ed. Resumptive Pronouns at the Interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 121–187.
[2] Bresnan, Joan – Asudeh, Ash – Toivonen, Ida – Wechsler, Stephen. 2016. Lexical-Functional Syntax (2nd edition). Wiley-Blackwell.
[3] Breul, Carsten. 2004. Focus structure in generative grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[4] Choi, Hye-Won. 1996. Optimizing structure in context. Stanford. Ph.D. thesis. Stanford University.
[5] Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical functional grammar. San Diego: Academic Press.
[6] Engels, Eva. 2012. Optimizing adverb positions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[7] Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Frey, Werner. 2003. Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes. In: Lang, Ewald et al., eds. Modifying adjuncts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 163–209.
[9] Frey, Werner. 2005. Pragmatic properties of certain German and English left peripheral constructions. Linguistics 43, pp. 89–129.
[10] Gregory, Michelle L. – Michaelis, Laura A. 2001. Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33, pp. 1665–1706. | DOI 10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00063-1
[11] Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphan approach. In: Chiba, Shuji et al., eds. Aspects of modern English linguistics: Papers presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday. Tokyo: Kaitakusha, pp. 232–254.
[12] Haegeman, Liliane. 1995. The syntax of negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Notes on Long Adverbial Fronting in English and the Left Periphery. Linguistic Inquiry 34, pp. 640–649.
[14] Lødrup, Helge. 2012. In search of a nominal COMP. In: Butt, Miriam – King Tracy H., eds. Proceedings of the LFG12 Conference Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 383–404.
[15] Maienborn, Claudia. 2001. On the position and interpretation of locative modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 9(2), pp. 191–240. | DOI 10.1023/A:1012405607146
[16] Mycock, Louise – Lowe, John. 2013. The prosodic marking of discourse functions. In Butt, Miriam – King, Tracy H., eds. Proceedings of the LFG13 conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 440–460.
[17] Neeleman, Ad et al. 2009. A syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast. In: Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van ed. Alternatives to Cartography. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 15–52.
[18] Prince, Ellen. 1999. How not to mark topics: 'Topicalization' in English and Yiddish. In: Texas Linguistics Forum (chapter 8). Austin: University of Texas.
[19] Shaer, Benjamin. 2004. On the syntactic status of certain fronted adverbials in English. In: Nowak, Pawel et al., eds. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 29. Berkeley, CA: BLS, pp. 379–390.
[20] Szűcs, Péter. 2014. Information structure and the English left periphery. In: Butt, Miriam – King, Tracy H., eds. Proceedings of the LFG14 Conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 545–565.
[21] Titov, Elena. 2013. Do contrastive topics exist? Journal of Linguistics 49(2), pp. 413–454. | DOI 10.1017/S0022226712000370
[22] Ward, Gregory. 1988. The semantics and pragmatics of preposing. New York/London: Garland Publishing.
[23] Zimmermann, Malte. 2008. Contrastive focus and emphasis. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55, pp. 347–360. | DOI 10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.9
[2] Bresnan, Joan – Asudeh, Ash – Toivonen, Ida – Wechsler, Stephen. 2016. Lexical-Functional Syntax (2nd edition). Wiley-Blackwell.
[3] Breul, Carsten. 2004. Focus structure in generative grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[4] Choi, Hye-Won. 1996. Optimizing structure in context. Stanford. Ph.D. thesis. Stanford University.
[5] Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical functional grammar. San Diego: Academic Press.
[6] Engels, Eva. 2012. Optimizing adverb positions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[7] Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Frey, Werner. 2003. Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes. In: Lang, Ewald et al., eds. Modifying adjuncts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 163–209.
[9] Frey, Werner. 2005. Pragmatic properties of certain German and English left peripheral constructions. Linguistics 43, pp. 89–129.
[10] Gregory, Michelle L. – Michaelis, Laura A. 2001. Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33, pp. 1665–1706. | DOI 10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00063-1
[11] Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphan approach. In: Chiba, Shuji et al., eds. Aspects of modern English linguistics: Papers presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday. Tokyo: Kaitakusha, pp. 232–254.
[12] Haegeman, Liliane. 1995. The syntax of negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Notes on Long Adverbial Fronting in English and the Left Periphery. Linguistic Inquiry 34, pp. 640–649.
[14] Lødrup, Helge. 2012. In search of a nominal COMP. In: Butt, Miriam – King Tracy H., eds. Proceedings of the LFG12 Conference Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 383–404.
[15] Maienborn, Claudia. 2001. On the position and interpretation of locative modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 9(2), pp. 191–240. | DOI 10.1023/A:1012405607146
[16] Mycock, Louise – Lowe, John. 2013. The prosodic marking of discourse functions. In Butt, Miriam – King, Tracy H., eds. Proceedings of the LFG13 conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 440–460.
[17] Neeleman, Ad et al. 2009. A syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast. In: Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van ed. Alternatives to Cartography. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 15–52.
[18] Prince, Ellen. 1999. How not to mark topics: 'Topicalization' in English and Yiddish. In: Texas Linguistics Forum (chapter 8). Austin: University of Texas.
[19] Shaer, Benjamin. 2004. On the syntactic status of certain fronted adverbials in English. In: Nowak, Pawel et al., eds. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 29. Berkeley, CA: BLS, pp. 379–390.
[20] Szűcs, Péter. 2014. Information structure and the English left periphery. In: Butt, Miriam – King, Tracy H., eds. Proceedings of the LFG14 Conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 545–565.
[21] Titov, Elena. 2013. Do contrastive topics exist? Journal of Linguistics 49(2), pp. 413–454. | DOI 10.1017/S0022226712000370
[22] Ward, Gregory. 1988. The semantics and pragmatics of preposing. New York/London: Garland Publishing.
[23] Zimmermann, Malte. 2008. Contrastive focus and emphasis. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55, pp. 347–360. | DOI 10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.9