Title: Conceptual metaphor theory cannot be just conceptual
Source document: Theatralia. 2021, vol. 24, iss. 1, pp. 267-270
Extent
267-270
-
ISSN1803-845X (print)2336-4548 (online)
Persistent identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/TY2021-1-17
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/143826
Type: Review
Language
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International
Reviewed work
Kövecses, Zoltán. Extended conceptual methaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [2020], ©2020. xiii, 196 stran. ISBN 978-1-108-49087-0.
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
References
[1] FAUCONNIER, Gilles and Mark TURNER. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books, 2002.
[2] GIBBS, Raymond W. 1994. The Poetics of Mind. Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[3] KÖVECSES, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[4] KÖVECSES, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2010.
[5] KÖVECSES, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come From. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford University Press, 2015.
[6] LAKOFF, George and Mark JOHNSON. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
[2] GIBBS, Raymond W. 1994. The Poetics of Mind. Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[3] KÖVECSES, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[4] KÖVECSES, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2010.
[5] KÖVECSES, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come From. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford University Press, 2015.
[6] LAKOFF, George and Mark JOHNSON. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 1980.