Název: Future of digital reading through the lens of Horizon scanning
Zdrojový dokument: ProInflow. 2014, roč. 6, č. 2, s. 3-15
Rozsah
3-15
-
ISSN1804-2406
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/133807
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the future of digital reading and present possible scenarios for designing digital reading experience. Author uses a foresight method called Horizon scanning which consists of desk research focusing on published experimental research studies within the field of reading on screen and on paper. Psychological and cognitive aspects of reading are presented here. Second part of the Horizon scanning method is a review of up-to-day emerging technological trends. Possible future scenarios for digital reading are discussed.
Reference
[1] ACKERMAN, Rakefet a Morris GOLDSMITH. Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied [online]. 2011, vol. 17, issue 1, s. 18-32 [cit. 2014-03-17]. DOI: 10.1037/a0022086. Available from: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0022086. | DOI 10.1037/a0022086
[2] BBC. Smartphone overuse may 'damage' eyes, say opticians [online]. 2014 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/26780069
[3] BEAUGRANDE, Robert De. Design Criteria for Process Models of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly. 1981, vol. 16, issue 2, s. 261-. DOI: 10.2307/747559. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/747559?origin=crossref | DOI 10.2307/747559
[4] BELL, Karissa. MASHABLE. Facebook's Paper vs. Flipboard: Comparing Mobile News Apps [online]. 2014 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://mashable.com/2014/02/04/facebooks-paper-vs-flipboard
[5] BERNS, Gregory S., Kristina BLAINE, Michael J. PRIETULA a Brandon E. PYE. Short- and Long-Term Effects of a Novel on Connectivity in the Brain. Brain Connectivity. 2013, roč. 3, č. 6, s. 590-600. | DOI 10.1089/brain.2013.0166
[6] BROWN, D. Horizon scanning and the business environment — the implications for risk management. BT Technology Journal. 2007, vol. 25, issue 1, s. 208-214. DOI: 10.1007/s10550-007-0022-8. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10550-007-0022-8 | DOI 10.1007/s10550-007-0022-8
[7] CARDEW, Ben. GUARDIAN. Personalised digital magazine app Flipboard aims for 150 million users [online]. 2014 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/media/media-blog/2014/jan/12/digital-magazine-app-flipboard
[8] CULL, Barry W. Reading revolutions: Online digital text and implications for reading in academe. First Monday [online]. 2011-06-06, vol. 16, issue 6, s. - [cit. 2014-10-17]. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v16i6.3340. Available from: http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3340. | DOI 10.5210/fm.v16i6.3340
[9] DILLON, Andrew. Designing usable electronic text. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor, 2003, viii, 214 p.ISBN 04-152-4060-3.
[10] DILLON, ANDREW. Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics [online]. 1992, vol. 35, issue 10, s. 1297-1326 [cit. 2014-10-17]. DOI: 10.1080/00140139208967394. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139208967394. | DOI 10.1080/00140139208967394
[11] FLIPBOARD. Flipboard for Educators [online]. 2013 [cit. 2014-10-17]. Available from: http://inside.flipboard.com/2013/08/29/flipboard-for-educators/
[12] GOOGLE PLAY. A Faster Reader [online]. 2014 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.basetis.blinkingread.blinkingread
[13] GOV.UK. Desktop, tablet and mobile use by time of day [online]. 2013 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: https://insidegovuk.blog.gov.uk/2013/11/14/desktop-tablet-and-mobile-use-by-time-of-day/
[14] HATT, Frank. The reading process: a framework for analysis and description. Hamden, Conn.: Linnet Books, 1976, 124 p. ISBN 02-080-1523-X.
[15] IMDB. Her [online]. 2013 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1798709
[16] KEEPITUSABLE. A psychologists thoughts on Spritz and the future of digital reading [online]. [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://www.keepitusable.com/blog/?p=1711
[17] KIM, Sangtae. YOUTUBE. [KAIST ITC] Smart E-Book Interface Prototype Demo [online]. 2012 [cit. 2014-10-17]. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVyBwz1-AiE
[18] KRETZSCHMAR, Franziska, Dominique PLEIMLING, Jana HOSEMANN, Stephan FÜSSEL, Ina BORNKESSEL-SCHLESEWSKY, Matthias SCHLESEWSKY a Thomas BORAUD. Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media. PLoS ONE [online]. 2013-2-6, vol. 8, issue 2, e56178- [cit. 2014-10-17]. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056178. Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056178. | DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056178
[19] LI, Liang-Yi, Gwo-Dong CHEN a Sheng-Jie YANG. Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers & Education [online]. 2013, vol. 60, issue 1, s. 32-39 [cit. 2014-10-17]. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.010. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360131512001704. | DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.010
[20] LIU, Ziming. Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation [online]. 2005, vol. 61, issue 6, s. 700-712 [cit. 2014-03-17]. DOI: 10.1108/00220410510632040. Available from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00220410510632040. | DOI 10.1108/00220410510632040
[21] MANGEN, Anne, Bente R. WALGERMO a Kolbjørn BRØNNICK. Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research [online]. 2013, vol. 58, s. 61-68 [cit. 2014-03-30]. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883035512001127 | DOI 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
[22] MAYES, Daniel K, Valerie K SIMS a Jefferson M KOONCE. Comprehension and workload differences for VDT and paper-based reading. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics [online]. 2001, vol. 28, issue 6, s. 367-378 [cit. 2014-10-17]. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00043-9. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169814101000439 | DOI 10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00043-9
[23] MCCLELLAND, James L. a David E. RUMELHART. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review. 1981, vol. 88, issue 5, s. 375-407. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375. Available from: http://content.apa.org/journals/rev/88/5/375 | DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
[24] NOYES, Jan M. a Kate J. GARLAND. Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent?. Ergonomics [online]. 2008, vol. 51, issue 9, s. 1352-1375 [cit. 2014-04-03]. DOI: 10.1080/00140130802170387. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140130802170387. | DOI 10.1080/00140130802170387
[25] PAYNE, Stephen J. a William R. READER. Constructing structure maps of multiple on-line texts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies [online]. 2006, vol. 64, issue 5, s. 461-474 [cit. 2014-03-17]. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.09.003. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1071581905001722. | DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.09.003
[26] RADER, Emilee a Paul ROSE. BITLAB. Effects of automated information selection and presentation in online information systems [online]. [cit. 2014-04-13]. Available from: http://bitlab.cas.msu.edu/curation/
[27] SPRITZ. Spritz [online]. [cit. 2014-04-18]. Available from: http://www.spritzinc.com/
[28] SPRITZ. The Science [online]. 2014 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://www.spritzinc.com/the-science/
[29] TWITTER. Saving searches [online]. [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: https://support.twitter.com/articles/96646-how-to-save-searches
[30] TWITTER. Using hashtags on Twitter [online]. [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://support.twitter.com/groups/53-discover/topics/216-trends/articles/49309-using-hashtags-on-twitter
[31] UNDERWOOD, Geoffrey a Vivienne BATT. Reading and understanding: an introduction to the psychology of reading. Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996, xii, 244 p. ISBN 06-311-7949-6.
[32] WÄSTLUND, Erik, Henrik REINIKKA, Torsten NORLANDER a Trevor ARCHER. Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors. Computers in Human Behavior [online]. 2005, vol. 21, issue 2, s. 377-394 [cit. 2014-03-17]. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.007. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563204000202 | DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.007
[33] WU, Ming-der a Shih-chuan CHEN. Graduate students' usage of and attitudes towards e-books: experiences from Taiwan. Program: electronic library and information systems [online]. 2011, vol. 45, issue 3, s. 294-307 [cit. 2014-03-17]. DOI: 10.1108/00330331111151601. Available from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00330331111151601. | DOI 10.1108/00330331111151601
[2] BBC. Smartphone overuse may 'damage' eyes, say opticians [online]. 2014 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/26780069
[3] BEAUGRANDE, Robert De. Design Criteria for Process Models of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly. 1981, vol. 16, issue 2, s. 261-. DOI: 10.2307/747559. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/747559?origin=crossref | DOI 10.2307/747559
[4] BELL, Karissa. MASHABLE. Facebook's Paper vs. Flipboard: Comparing Mobile News Apps [online]. 2014 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://mashable.com/2014/02/04/facebooks-paper-vs-flipboard
[5] BERNS, Gregory S., Kristina BLAINE, Michael J. PRIETULA a Brandon E. PYE. Short- and Long-Term Effects of a Novel on Connectivity in the Brain. Brain Connectivity. 2013, roč. 3, č. 6, s. 590-600. | DOI 10.1089/brain.2013.0166
[6] BROWN, D. Horizon scanning and the business environment — the implications for risk management. BT Technology Journal. 2007, vol. 25, issue 1, s. 208-214. DOI: 10.1007/s10550-007-0022-8. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10550-007-0022-8 | DOI 10.1007/s10550-007-0022-8
[7] CARDEW, Ben. GUARDIAN. Personalised digital magazine app Flipboard aims for 150 million users [online]. 2014 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/media/media-blog/2014/jan/12/digital-magazine-app-flipboard
[8] CULL, Barry W. Reading revolutions: Online digital text and implications for reading in academe. First Monday [online]. 2011-06-06, vol. 16, issue 6, s. - [cit. 2014-10-17]. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v16i6.3340. Available from: http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3340. | DOI 10.5210/fm.v16i6.3340
[9] DILLON, Andrew. Designing usable electronic text. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor, 2003, viii, 214 p.ISBN 04-152-4060-3.
[10] DILLON, ANDREW. Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics [online]. 1992, vol. 35, issue 10, s. 1297-1326 [cit. 2014-10-17]. DOI: 10.1080/00140139208967394. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139208967394. | DOI 10.1080/00140139208967394
[11] FLIPBOARD. Flipboard for Educators [online]. 2013 [cit. 2014-10-17]. Available from: http://inside.flipboard.com/2013/08/29/flipboard-for-educators/
[12] GOOGLE PLAY. A Faster Reader [online]. 2014 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.basetis.blinkingread.blinkingread
[13] GOV.UK. Desktop, tablet and mobile use by time of day [online]. 2013 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: https://insidegovuk.blog.gov.uk/2013/11/14/desktop-tablet-and-mobile-use-by-time-of-day/
[14] HATT, Frank. The reading process: a framework for analysis and description. Hamden, Conn.: Linnet Books, 1976, 124 p. ISBN 02-080-1523-X.
[15] IMDB. Her [online]. 2013 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1798709
[16] KEEPITUSABLE. A psychologists thoughts on Spritz and the future of digital reading [online]. [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://www.keepitusable.com/blog/?p=1711
[17] KIM, Sangtae. YOUTUBE. [KAIST ITC] Smart E-Book Interface Prototype Demo [online]. 2012 [cit. 2014-10-17]. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVyBwz1-AiE
[18] KRETZSCHMAR, Franziska, Dominique PLEIMLING, Jana HOSEMANN, Stephan FÜSSEL, Ina BORNKESSEL-SCHLESEWSKY, Matthias SCHLESEWSKY a Thomas BORAUD. Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media. PLoS ONE [online]. 2013-2-6, vol. 8, issue 2, e56178- [cit. 2014-10-17]. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056178. Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056178. | DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056178
[19] LI, Liang-Yi, Gwo-Dong CHEN a Sheng-Jie YANG. Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers & Education [online]. 2013, vol. 60, issue 1, s. 32-39 [cit. 2014-10-17]. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.010. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360131512001704. | DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.010
[20] LIU, Ziming. Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation [online]. 2005, vol. 61, issue 6, s. 700-712 [cit. 2014-03-17]. DOI: 10.1108/00220410510632040. Available from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00220410510632040. | DOI 10.1108/00220410510632040
[21] MANGEN, Anne, Bente R. WALGERMO a Kolbjørn BRØNNICK. Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research [online]. 2013, vol. 58, s. 61-68 [cit. 2014-03-30]. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883035512001127 | DOI 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
[22] MAYES, Daniel K, Valerie K SIMS a Jefferson M KOONCE. Comprehension and workload differences for VDT and paper-based reading. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics [online]. 2001, vol. 28, issue 6, s. 367-378 [cit. 2014-10-17]. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00043-9. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169814101000439 | DOI 10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00043-9
[23] MCCLELLAND, James L. a David E. RUMELHART. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review. 1981, vol. 88, issue 5, s. 375-407. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375. Available from: http://content.apa.org/journals/rev/88/5/375 | DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
[24] NOYES, Jan M. a Kate J. GARLAND. Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent?. Ergonomics [online]. 2008, vol. 51, issue 9, s. 1352-1375 [cit. 2014-04-03]. DOI: 10.1080/00140130802170387. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140130802170387. | DOI 10.1080/00140130802170387
[25] PAYNE, Stephen J. a William R. READER. Constructing structure maps of multiple on-line texts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies [online]. 2006, vol. 64, issue 5, s. 461-474 [cit. 2014-03-17]. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.09.003. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1071581905001722. | DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.09.003
[26] RADER, Emilee a Paul ROSE. BITLAB. Effects of automated information selection and presentation in online information systems [online]. [cit. 2014-04-13]. Available from: http://bitlab.cas.msu.edu/curation/
[27] SPRITZ. Spritz [online]. [cit. 2014-04-18]. Available from: http://www.spritzinc.com/
[28] SPRITZ. The Science [online]. 2014 [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://www.spritzinc.com/the-science/
[29] TWITTER. Saving searches [online]. [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: https://support.twitter.com/articles/96646-how-to-save-searches
[30] TWITTER. Using hashtags on Twitter [online]. [cit. 2014-04-17]. Available from: http://support.twitter.com/groups/53-discover/topics/216-trends/articles/49309-using-hashtags-on-twitter
[31] UNDERWOOD, Geoffrey a Vivienne BATT. Reading and understanding: an introduction to the psychology of reading. Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996, xii, 244 p. ISBN 06-311-7949-6.
[32] WÄSTLUND, Erik, Henrik REINIKKA, Torsten NORLANDER a Trevor ARCHER. Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors. Computers in Human Behavior [online]. 2005, vol. 21, issue 2, s. 377-394 [cit. 2014-03-17]. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.007. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563204000202 | DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.007
[33] WU, Ming-der a Shih-chuan CHEN. Graduate students' usage of and attitudes towards e-books: experiences from Taiwan. Program: electronic library and information systems [online]. 2011, vol. 45, issue 3, s. 294-307 [cit. 2014-03-17]. DOI: 10.1108/00330331111151601. Available from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00330331111151601. | DOI 10.1108/00330331111151601