Ellipsis in sequences of multiple wh-words

Název: Ellipsis in sequences of multiple wh-words
Variantní název:
  • Elipsa v řetězcích tázacích zájmen
Zdrojový dokument: Linguistica Brunensia. 2016, roč. 64, č. 1, s. 57-69
Rozsah
57-69
  • ISSN
    1803-7410 (print)
    2336-4440 (online)
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
 

Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.

Abstrakt(y)
This article deals with elliptical sequences of multiple wh-words in Czech. It is argued that such sequences involve two different constructions, elliptical multiple questions and elliptical assertions. Wh-words in elliptical multiple questions share the properties of wh-words in non-elliptical questions; they have the same syntactic distribution and semantic interpretation, they do not show superiority effects, and their combinability depends on their reading. Moreover, elliptical questions can be reconstructed into syntactically complete questions. In contrast, elliptical assertions differ from elliptical questions in several aspects. They always contain the word ‘jak’ in initial position, they do not have question interpretation and cannot be reconstructed into full clauses. I propose that elliptical multiple questions result from TP-deletion after movement of the wh-words into CP domain (so-called multiple sluicing) and the TP-ellipsis is driven by the Focus feature. This explains that it can also apply to referential focused DPs. As for elliptical assertions, I claim that they are base-generated and involve semantic ellipsis, i.e. a null category, which gets its interpretation from a TP in the previous context.
Reference
[1] Bošković, Željko. 1999. On multiple feature-checking: Multiple wh-fronting and multiple headmovement. In: Epstein, Samuel – Hornstein, Norbert, eds. Working Minimalism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 159–187.

[2] Bosković, Željko. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry. 33, pp. 351–384. | DOI 10.1162/002438902760168536

[3] Chung, Sandra – Ladusaw, William – McCloskey, James. 1995. Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics. 3, pp. 239–282. | DOI 10.1007/BF01248819

[4] Chung, Sandra. 2013. Syntactic Identity in Sluicing: How Much and Why. Linguistic Inquiry. 44(1), pp. 1–44. | DOI 10.1162/LING_a_00118

[5] Grebenyova, Lydia. 2006. Sluicing and Multiple Wh-fronting. In: Richa, Srihti – Sinha, Samar, eds. Proceedings of GLOW in Asia. Vol. 5. pp. 219–242. Also available at: http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=ling_facpub.

[6] Gruet-Skrabalova, Hana. 2011. Czech questions with two wh-words. In: Kosta, Peter – Schürcks, Lilia, eds. Formalization of Grammar in Slavic Languages. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 179–192.

[7] Laka, Itzar. 1990. On the syntax of negation. Cambridge, Mass. Ph.D. thesis. MIT.

[8] Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When you can save a structure by destroying it? In: Kim, Minjoo – Strauss, Uri, eds. Proceedings of NELS 31. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA, pp. 301–320.

[9] Lenertová, Denisa. 2001. On Clitic Placement, Topicalization and CP-Structure in Czech. In: Kosta, Peter – Frasek, Jens, eds. Current Approaches to Formal Slavic Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 294–305.

[10] Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: functional heads, identification, and licensing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[11] Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[12] Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and Ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy. 27(6), pp. 661–738. | DOI 10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3

[13] Merchant, Jason. 2006. Sluicing. In: Everaert, Martin – van Riemsdijk, Henk, eds. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 269–289.

[14] Meyer, Roland. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting and wh-clustering in Czech. In: Brown, Wales et al., eds. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 11: The Amherst Meeting. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 393–412.

[15] Meyer, Roland. 2004. Superiority effects in Russian, Polish, and Czech. Cahiers linguistiques d'Ottawa. 32, pp. 44–65.

[16] Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In: Haegeman, Liliana, ed. Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281–337.

[17] Ross, John. 1969. Guess who? In: Binnick, Robert et al., eds. Papers from the 5th regional Meeting of CLS. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 252–286.

[18] Rudin, Catherine. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple Wh-fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 6(4), pp. 445–501. | DOI 10.1007/BF00134489

[19] Stepanov, Arthur. 1998. On Wh-Fronting in Russian. In: Tamanji, Pius – Kusumoto, Kiyomi, eds. Proceedings of NELS 28. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA, pp. 453–467.

[20] Stjepanović, Sandra. 2003. Multiple Wh-Fronting in Serbo-Croatian Matrix Questions and the Matrix Sluicing Constructions. In: Boeckx, Cedric – Grohmann, Kleanthes, eds. Multiple Wh-fronting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 255–284.