Název: Paideia [Education] through the lens of the words in the poetry of Gregory of Nazianzus
Zdrojový dokument: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2016, roč. 21, č. 1, s. 5-19
Rozsah
5-19
-
ISSN1803-7402 (print)2336-4424 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/GLB2016-1-1
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/135485
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
The affection for words was an intrinsic part of Saint Gregory of Nazianzus' personality. As a theologian, orator, and poet he was well aware of the nuances and the power words yield. The aim of this article is to examine Gregory's approach to classical education as presented in his poetry, [and] expressed through his praise of words, or eloquence, in general. The motivation for focusing the research on his poetry is the fact that, for Gregory, poetry was his the means of influencing young Christians. Gregory intended to offer them more appealing reading than the austere Christian commandments. For him, logoi and mythoi embracing, inter alia, ancient erudition (i.e. not the knowledge of philosophy and literature alone but also, for example, mythology) were the solid cornerstones to build upon, and which could also be used by young Christians able of critical thinking to choose only the good and beneficial from it. Thus, Gregory's poetry reflects various philosophical motifs, including his striking inspiration by Cynicism, but also his reservations concerning empty formal rhetoric.
Reference
[1] Bernardi, J. (Ed.). (1978). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 1–3 (Sources Chrétiennes, 247). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[2] Bernardi, J. (1983). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 4–5. Contre Julien (Sources Chrétiennes, 309). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[3] Bernardi, J. (Ed.). (1992). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 42–43 (Sources Chrétiennes, 384). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[4] Calvet-Sebasti, M. A. (Ed.). (1995). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 6–12 (Sources Chrétiennes, 405). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[5] Gallay, P. (Ed.). (1964–1967). Saint Grégoire de Nazianze: Lettres. Paris: Les belles Lettres.
[6] Gallay, P., & Jourjon, M. (Eds.). (1974). Grégoire de Nazianze: Lettres théologiques (Sources Chrétiennes, 208). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[7] Gallay, P., & Jourjon, M. (Eds.). (1978). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 27–31 (Sources Chrétiennes, 250). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[8] Gallay, P., & Moreschini, C. (Eds.). (1985). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 32–37 (Sources Chrétiennes, 318). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[9] Gallay, P., & Moreschini, C. (Eds.). (1990). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 38–41 (Sources Chrétiennes, 358). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[10] Migne, J. P. (Ed.). (1857–1858). Tu en hagiois patros hēmōn Grēgoriu ... ta heuriskomena panta (Patrologiae cursus completus, Series Graeca, Vol. 35–38). Paris.
[11] Mossay, J., & Lafontaine, G. (Eds.). (1980). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 20–23 (Sources Chrétiennes, 270). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[12] Mossay, J., & Lafontaine, G. (Eds.). (1981). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 24–26 (Sources Chrétiennes, 284). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[13] Špaňár, J. (Transl.). (1990). Platon: Dialógy. Bratislava: Tatran.
[14] Asmus, R. (1991). Gregorius von Nazianz und sein Verhältnis zum Kynismus. Eine patristisch-philosophische Studie. In M. Billerbeck (Ed.), Die Kyniker in der modernen Forschung (pp. 185–205). Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.
[15] Brodňanská, E. (2010). Chudoba vs. bohatstvo v morálnej poézii Gregora z Naziánu. Theologos, 12, 1, 72–83.
[16] Brodňanská, E. (2012). Gregor z Nazianzu. Listy vo veršoch. Prešov: Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej univerzity.
[17] Brodňanská, E. (2014). Svätí Konštantín-Cyril a Gregor z Nazianzu – služobníci s/Slova. Slavica Slovaca, 49(1), 20–30.
[18] Brodňanská, E., & Koželová, A. (2013). Alegoría médical en la poesía moral de Gregorio Nacianceno. Graeco-Latina Brunensia, 18(2), 43–66.
[19] Cameron, A. (1991). Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire. The Development of Christian Discourse. Berkeley – Los Angeles – London: University of California Press.
[20] Demoen, K. (1993). The Attitude towards Greek Poetry in the Verse of Gregory Nazianzen. In J. den Boeft, & A. Hilhorst (Eds.), Early Christian Poetry. A Collection of Essays. Leiden: J. Brill.
[21] Flachbartová, L. (2011). Vzťah medzi kynizmom a cynizmom. Filozofia, 66(6), 522–534.
[22] Flachbartová, L. (2014). Antický kynizmus ako spôsob života. Diss., Prešov: Prešovská univerzita.
[23] Hadot, P. (1992). Duchovní cvičení a "křesťanská filosofie". Reflexe. Filosofický časopis, 07/08, 1–18. (Retrieved 17. 12. 2015 from http://www.reflexe.cz/duchovni-cviceni-a-krestanska-filosofie/.)
[24] Hofer, A. (2013). Christ in the Life and Teaching of Gregory of Nazianzus. Oxford: University Press.
[25] Kaiser, E. (1964). Odyssee-Szenen als Topoi. Museum Helveticum, 21, 109–136, 197–224.
[26] Kessidi, F. Ch. (1985). Hérakleitos. Praha: Svoboda.
[27] Paton, W. R. (Transl.). (1919). The Greek Anthology (Vol. II). London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam's sons. (Retrieved 14. 4. 2016. from https://archive.org/stream/greekanthology02newyuoft#page/434/mode/2up).
[28] Sheldon-Williams, I. P. (2002). Tradice řeckého křesťanského platonismu od kappadockých Otců po Maxima a Eriugenu. In A. H. Armstrong (Ed.), Filosofie pozdní antiky (pp. 473–499). Praha: OIKOYMENH.
[29] Suvák, V. (2011). Antisthenés medzi Sókratom a Diogenom. Filozofia, 66(6), 545–557.
[30] Špidlík, T. (2010). Řehoř Naziánský. Úvod ke studiu jeho duchovní nauky. Olomouc: Refugium.
[31] Zozuľak, J. (2005). Filozofia, teológia, jazyk. Prešov: Prešovská univerzita.
[2] Bernardi, J. (1983). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 4–5. Contre Julien (Sources Chrétiennes, 309). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[3] Bernardi, J. (Ed.). (1992). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 42–43 (Sources Chrétiennes, 384). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[4] Calvet-Sebasti, M. A. (Ed.). (1995). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 6–12 (Sources Chrétiennes, 405). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[5] Gallay, P. (Ed.). (1964–1967). Saint Grégoire de Nazianze: Lettres. Paris: Les belles Lettres.
[6] Gallay, P., & Jourjon, M. (Eds.). (1974). Grégoire de Nazianze: Lettres théologiques (Sources Chrétiennes, 208). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[7] Gallay, P., & Jourjon, M. (Eds.). (1978). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 27–31 (Sources Chrétiennes, 250). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[8] Gallay, P., & Moreschini, C. (Eds.). (1985). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 32–37 (Sources Chrétiennes, 318). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[9] Gallay, P., & Moreschini, C. (Eds.). (1990). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 38–41 (Sources Chrétiennes, 358). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[10] Migne, J. P. (Ed.). (1857–1858). Tu en hagiois patros hēmōn Grēgoriu ... ta heuriskomena panta (Patrologiae cursus completus, Series Graeca, Vol. 35–38). Paris.
[11] Mossay, J., & Lafontaine, G. (Eds.). (1980). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 20–23 (Sources Chrétiennes, 270). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[12] Mossay, J., & Lafontaine, G. (Eds.). (1981). Grégoire de Nazianze: Discours 24–26 (Sources Chrétiennes, 284). Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
[13] Špaňár, J. (Transl.). (1990). Platon: Dialógy. Bratislava: Tatran.
[14] Asmus, R. (1991). Gregorius von Nazianz und sein Verhältnis zum Kynismus. Eine patristisch-philosophische Studie. In M. Billerbeck (Ed.), Die Kyniker in der modernen Forschung (pp. 185–205). Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.
[15] Brodňanská, E. (2010). Chudoba vs. bohatstvo v morálnej poézii Gregora z Naziánu. Theologos, 12, 1, 72–83.
[16] Brodňanská, E. (2012). Gregor z Nazianzu. Listy vo veršoch. Prešov: Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej univerzity.
[17] Brodňanská, E. (2014). Svätí Konštantín-Cyril a Gregor z Nazianzu – služobníci s/Slova. Slavica Slovaca, 49(1), 20–30.
[18] Brodňanská, E., & Koželová, A. (2013). Alegoría médical en la poesía moral de Gregorio Nacianceno. Graeco-Latina Brunensia, 18(2), 43–66.
[19] Cameron, A. (1991). Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire. The Development of Christian Discourse. Berkeley – Los Angeles – London: University of California Press.
[20] Demoen, K. (1993). The Attitude towards Greek Poetry in the Verse of Gregory Nazianzen. In J. den Boeft, & A. Hilhorst (Eds.), Early Christian Poetry. A Collection of Essays. Leiden: J. Brill.
[21] Flachbartová, L. (2011). Vzťah medzi kynizmom a cynizmom. Filozofia, 66(6), 522–534.
[22] Flachbartová, L. (2014). Antický kynizmus ako spôsob života. Diss., Prešov: Prešovská univerzita.
[23] Hadot, P. (1992). Duchovní cvičení a "křesťanská filosofie". Reflexe. Filosofický časopis, 07/08, 1–18. (Retrieved 17. 12. 2015 from http://www.reflexe.cz/duchovni-cviceni-a-krestanska-filosofie/.)
[24] Hofer, A. (2013). Christ in the Life and Teaching of Gregory of Nazianzus. Oxford: University Press.
[25] Kaiser, E. (1964). Odyssee-Szenen als Topoi. Museum Helveticum, 21, 109–136, 197–224.
[26] Kessidi, F. Ch. (1985). Hérakleitos. Praha: Svoboda.
[27] Paton, W. R. (Transl.). (1919). The Greek Anthology (Vol. II). London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam's sons. (Retrieved 14. 4. 2016. from https://archive.org/stream/greekanthology02newyuoft#page/434/mode/2up).
[28] Sheldon-Williams, I. P. (2002). Tradice řeckého křesťanského platonismu od kappadockých Otců po Maxima a Eriugenu. In A. H. Armstrong (Ed.), Filosofie pozdní antiky (pp. 473–499). Praha: OIKOYMENH.
[29] Suvák, V. (2011). Antisthenés medzi Sókratom a Diogenom. Filozofia, 66(6), 545–557.
[30] Špidlík, T. (2010). Řehoř Naziánský. Úvod ke studiu jeho duchovní nauky. Olomouc: Refugium.
[31] Zozuľak, J. (2005). Filozofia, teológia, jazyk. Prešov: Prešovská univerzita.