Raising awareness around writers' voice in academic discourse : an analysis of writers' (in)visibility

Název: Raising awareness around writers' voice in academic discourse : an analysis of writers' (in)visibility
Zdrojový dokument: Brno studies in English. 2019, roč. 45, č. 2, s. [53]-76
Rozsah
[53]-76
  • ISSN
    0524-6881 (print)
    1805-0867 (online)
Type: Článek
Jazyk
 

Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.

Abstrakt(y)
This paper aims to contribute to the study of the concept of writer's visibility inspired by approaches to the analysis of identity in written discourse (see Ivanič 1998, Charles 1999 and John 2005). The way medical academic writers selfrepresent themselves in their research articles can be seen in terms of a gradable visibility cline crafted and constrained by the academic genre expectations of these texts (Swales and Feak 2004; Stock and Eik-Nes 2016). Traditionally, authorial visibility has been studied within frameworks such as evaluation, authorial voice and stance. Still, there is no framework as yet been proposed that binds together possible textual realisations that can be considered as visibility features in academic written texts. This paper conducts a study of 40 medical research articles that reveal different manifestations of the authors' presence. A cline is proposed that encompasses different lexico-grammatical realisations such as self-mentions, passive constructions and non-animated subjects followed by active verbs. These features can be interpreted as authorial voice realisations that allow us to measure or grade writers' visibility and its rhetorical implication in the text.
Note
This research has been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (FFI2017-84205-R), "the Gobierno de Aragon CIRES (H16-17-R)" and by the Fundación Ibercaja together with the University of Zaragoza (JIUZ-2018-HUM-03).
Reference
[1] Biber, Douglas and Eduard Finegan (1989) Style of stance in English: lexical and grammatical marking of evidentially and affect. Text 9 (1), 93–124.

[2] Biber, Douglas and Bethany Gray (2012) Current conceptions of stance. In: Ken Hyland and Carmen Sancho-Guinda. (eds.) Stance and Voice in Academic Genres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 15–34.

[3] Bondi, Marina (2009) Polyphony in academic discourse: A cross-cultural perspective on historical discourse. In: Sumela-Salmi, Eija and Dervin, Fred (eds.) Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural Perspective on Academic Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 83–108.

[4] Bordet, Ganvier (2013) The rhetorical role of 'collocational chains' and their implications in the building of scientific discourse strategies. European Journal of English Studies 17 (3), 235–250. | DOI 10.1080/13825577.2013.867183

[5] Bowden, Darsie (1995) The rise of a metaphor: voice in composition pedagogy. Rhetoric Review 14 (1), 173–188. | DOI 10.1080/07350199509389058

[6] Burgess, Amy and Ivanič, Roz (2010) Writing and being written. Issues of identity across timescales. Written Communication 27 (2), 228–255. | DOI 10.1177/0741088310363447

[7] Butler, Judith (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of the Identity. London: Routledge.

[8] Charles, Maggie (1999) Aspects of the author's voice in three academic research articles. In: Thompson, Paul (ed.) Issues in EAP Writing Research and Instruction. CALS publication, 71–83.

[9] Charles, Maggie (2004) The construction of stance: a corpus-based investigation of two contrasting disciplines. University of Birmingham. PhD Thesis. (Unpublished).

[10] Charles, Maggie (2006) Revealing and obscuring the writer's identity: evidence from a corpus of theses. In: Kiely, R., Rea-Dikins, P., Woodfiled, H. and Clibbon, G (eds.), Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics British Studies in Applied Linguistics 21, 147–161.

[11] Charles, Maggie (2007) Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variations in the use of the Noun that patter in stance constructions. English for Specific Purposes 23, 203–218. | DOI 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004

[12] Ciapuscio, Guimar (2003) Formulation and reformulation procedures in verbal interactions between experts and (semi-)laypersons. Discourse Studies 5 (2), 207–233. | DOI 10.1177/1461445603005002004

[13] Curry, Mary Jane and Theresa Lillis (2004) Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands and rewards. TESOL Quarterly 38(4), 663–688. | DOI 10.2307/3588284

[14] Dressen-Hammouda, Dacia (2008) From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary becoming and genre mastery. English for Specific Purposes 27, 233–252. | DOI 10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.006

[15] Dressen-Hammouda, Dacia (2014) Measuring the voice of disciplinarity in scientific writing: A longitudinal exploration of experienced writers in geology. English for Specific Purposes 34, 14–25. | DOI 10.1016/j.esp.2013.10.001

[16] Downing, Angela and Philip Locke (1992) 2002 A University Course in English Grammar. London: Routledge.

[17] Elbow, Peter (1994) What do we mean when we talk about voice in texts?. In: Blake Yancey, K. (ed.) Voices on Voice: Perspectives, Definitions, Inquiry. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English, 1–35.

[18] Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

[19] Fairclough, Norman (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. Harlow: Longman.

[20] Ferrari, Laura and Susana Gallardo (1999) Los marcadores de evindecialidad empleados por la prensa en una controversia ambiental. Discurso y Sociedad. Barcelona. Gedisa 1(4), 69–93.

[21] Ferrari, Laura (2003) Marcadores de modalidad epistémica en artículos de investigación". In: García Wegroni, Marta (ed.) Actas del Congreso Internacional La Argumentación. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Lingüística.

[22] Fortanet, Inmaculada (1998) Verb usage in academic writing: Reporting verbs in economics research articles in English and in Spanish. In: Lita Lundquist, Heribert Picht and Jacques Qvistgaard (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Language for Special Purposes. LSP Identity and Interface Research, Knowledge and Society. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, LSP Centre, 231–240.

[23] Fortanet, Inmaculada, Palmer, Juan Carlos and Posteguillo, Santiago (2001) Hedging devices in technical and academic English. In: Palmer, Jose Carlos, Posteguillo, Santiago and Fortanet, Inmaculada (eds.) Discourse Analysis and Terminology in Language for Specific Purposes. Castelló: Universitat Jaume I, 13–24.

[24] Foucault, Michel (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.

[25] Gil-Salom, Luz (2000-2001) El discurso de la ciencia y la tecnología: El artículo científico de investigación vs. el artículo de divulgación científica. RESLA 14, 429–449.

[26] Goffman, Erving (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[27] Halliday, Michael A. K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

[28] Halliday, Michael A. K. (1998) Things and relations: regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In: Martin, James and Veels, Robert (eds.) Reading Science. London: Routledge, 185–235.

[29] Halliday, Michael A. K. and Martin, James (1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.

[30] Harwood, Nigel (2005a) 'Nowhere has anyone attempted… In this article I aim to do just that': A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 37, 1207–1231. | DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012

[31] Harwood, Nigel (2005b) 'We do not seem to have a theory ... the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap': Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 26 (3), 343–375. | DOI 10.1093/applin/ami012

[32] Herrando-Rodrigo, Isabel (2010) 'If you suffer from… Check the Internet': The role of self mentions and engagement markers in medical research articles and electronic popularizations. In: Lorés-Sanz, Rosa, Mur-Dueñas, Pilar and Lafuente-Millán, Eenrique (eds.) Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 255–275.

[33] Herrando-Rodrigo, Isabel (2014) A Contribution to the Study of Writers' Self-representation: Visible Researchers, Invisible Writers, or How to Make Medical Electronic Popularizations Trustworthy. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias Zaragoza.

[34] Herrando-Rodrigo, Isabel, Mur-Dueñas, Pilar and Lorés-Sanz, Rosa (2012) Academic Writing in Health Science. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias Zaragoza.

[35] Hunston, Susan and Thompson, Geoff (2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–27.

[36] Hyland, Ken (1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

[37] Hyland, Ken (2005) Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7 (2), 173–192. | DOI 10.1177/1461445605050365

[38] Hyland, Ken (2015). Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 19, 32–43. | DOI 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005

[39] Hyland, Ken (2018a) Narrative, identity in academic story telling. ILCEA 38, 1–16.

[40] Hyland, Ken (2018b) The communication of expertise: Changes in academic writing over 50 years. CERLIS 2018. Università di Bergamo (Italy). 21–23 June, 2018.

[41] Hyland, Ken and Sancho, Carmen (2012) Stance and voice in Academic Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

[42] Ivanič, Roz (1998) Writing an identity: the discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

[43] Ivanič, Roz and Camps, David (2001) I am how I sound: voice as self representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 10, 3–33. | DOI 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00034-0

[44] Jaffe, Alexandra (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[45] John, Suganthi (2005) The Writing Process and Writing Identity: Investigating the Influence of Revision on Linguistic and Textual Features of Writer Identity in Dissertations. UK: University of Birmingham. PhD Thesis (Unpublished).

[46] John, Suganthi (2007) Meeting the challenge of developing an academic identity a textual approach. In: Teo, P and Ho, C. (eds.), Discourse in the modern world: Perspectives and challenges. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 28–52.

[47] John, Suganthi (2009) Using the revision process to help international students understand the linguistic construction of the academic identity. In: Charles, Maggie, Diane, Pecorari and Susan Hunston (eds.) Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse. London: Continuum, 272–290.

[48] Kim, Chul-Kyu and Thompson, Geoff (2010) Obligation and reader involvement in English and Korean science popularizations a corpus-based cross-cultural text analysis. Text & Talk 1, 53–73.

[49] Laso, Natalia and John, Suganthi (2017) A corpus-based analysis of the collocational patterning of adjectives with abstract nouns in medical English. 9th International Conference on Corpus Linguistics. May 31st to June 2nd. Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.

[50] Lewin, Beverly A. (1998) Hedging: from and function in scientific research texts. In: Fortanet, Inmaculada (eds.) Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes. Castelló de la Plana: Publicaciones de la Universitat Jaume I, 89–104.

[51] Lillis, Theresa (2017) Working with Ethnography to Explore Textual Practices. Seminar, University of Zaragoza, Spain, September 26th, 2017.

[52] Lorés-Sanz, Rosa (2006) 'I will argue that': First person pronouns and metadiscoursal devices in research article abstracts in English and Spanish. ESP Across Cultures 3, 23–40.

[53] Lorés-Sanz, Rosa (2008) Authorial visibility in research article and research article abstracts: the intergeneric perspective. In: Burgess, Sally and Martín-Martín, Pedro (eds.) English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication. Berlin: Peter Lang, 105–122.

[54] Lorés-Sanz, Rosa (2009) Different worlds, different audiences: a contrastive analysis of research article abstracts. In: Suomela-Salmi, Eija and Fred Dervin (eds.) Cross-linguistic and Crosscultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 187–198.

[55] Lorés-Sanz, Rosa (2011a) The construction of the author's voice in academic writing: the interplay of cultural and disciplinary factors. Text and Talk 31 (2), 173–193. | DOI 10.1515/text.2011.008

[56] Lorés-Sanz, Rosa (2011b) The study of authorial voice: using a Spanish-English corpus to explore linguistic transference. Corpora 6 (1), 1–24.

[57] Luzón Marco, María Jose (2000) Collocational framework in medical research papers: a genrebased study. English for Specific Purposes 19 (1), 63–86. | DOI 10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00013-1

[58] Martin, James R. and White, Michael (2005) The language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.

[59] Martínez, Iliana. A. (2001) Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity system. English for Specific Purposes 20 (3), 227–247. | DOI 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00013-2

[60] Martínez, Iliana A. (2005) Native and non-native writer's use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing 14 (3), 174–190. | DOI 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001

[61] Matsuda, Paul K. (2001) Voice in Japanese written discourse: implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (1–2). University of New Hampshire, 35–53.

[62] Matsuda, Paul and Tardy, Christine (2007) Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes 26 (2), 235–249. | DOI 10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001

[63] Matsuda, Paul and Tardy, Christine (2008) Continuing the conversation on voice in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 27 (1), 100–105. | DOI 10.1016/j.esp.2007.04.002

[64] Molino, Alessandra (2010) Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive study of English and Italian linguistic research articles. English for Specific Purposes (9), 86–101. | DOI 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.007

[65] Mur-Dueñas, Pilar (2007) 'I/we focus on…' A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles". Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6 (2), 143–162. | DOI 10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.002

[66] Mur-Dueñas, Pilar and Jolanta Šinkūnienė (2016) Self-reference in research articles across Europe and Asia: A review of studies. Brno Studies in English 42 (1), 71–92. | DOI 10.5817/BSE2016-1-4

[67] Petrić, Bojana (2010) Students' conceptions of voice in academic writing. In: Lores-Sanz, Rosa, Mur-Dueñas, Pilar and Lafuente-Millan, Enrique (eds.) Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 324–349.

[68] Prince, Ellen, Frader, Joel and Bosk, Charles (1982) On Hedginng in Physicians-Physician Discourse. In Pietro, R. J. di (ed.) Linguistics and professions. Noordwood, New Jersey: Ablex, 83–97.

[69] Prior, Paul (2001) Voices in text, mind, and society: sociohistoric accounts of discourse acquisitions and use. Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (1/2), 55–81.

[70] Salager-Meyers, Françoise (1994) Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical English Written Discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13 (2), 149–170. | DOI 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2

[71] Salager-Meyers, Françoise, Alcaraz Ariza, M. A. and Zambrano, N (2003) The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: Intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930–1995). English for Specific Purposes 22 (3), 223–247.

[72] Seoane, Elena and Hundt, M. (2018) Voice Alternation and Authorial Presence: Variation across Disciplinary Areas in Academic English. Journal of English Linguistics 46 (1), 3–22. | DOI 10.1177/0075424217740938

[73] Shaw, Philip (1992) Reasons for the correlation of Voice, Tense and Sentence Function in Reporting Verbs. Applied Linguistics 13 (3), 302–319. | DOI 10.1093/applin/13.3.302

[74] Stapleton, Paul and Helms-Park, Rena (2008) A response to Matsuda and Tardy's 'Voice in academic writing: the rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript reviews'. English for Specific Purpose 27, 94–99. | DOI 10.1016/j.esp.2007.04.001

[75] Stock, Ingrid and Eik-Nes, Nancy (2016) Voice features in academic texts – A review of empirical studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 24, 89–99. | DOI 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.006

[76] Swales, John (1997) English as Tyrannosaurus rex. World Englishes 16 (3), 373–382. | DOI 10.1111/1467-971X.00071

[77] Swales, John and Feak, Christine (2004) Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Michigan series in English for Academic and Professional Purposes.

[78] Tang, Ramona and John, Suganthi (1999) The 'I' in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English Specific Purposes 18, 23–39. | DOI 10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5

[79] Tang, Ramona (2004) An Approach to Written Academic Voice: Exploring the Interpersonal Negotiations in Student Academic Writing through APPRAISAL. University of Birmingham. PhD Thesis (Unpublished).

[80] Tardy, Christine (2004) The role of English in scientific communication: Lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex?. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3, 247–269. | DOI 10.1016/j.jeap.2003.10.001

[81] Tardy, Christine (2012) Current conceptions of voice. In: Hyland, Ken and Sancho Guinda, Carmen (eds.) Stance and Voice in Academic Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 34–46.

[82] Thomas, Sarah and Hawes, Thomas P. (1994) Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 13 (2), 129–148. | DOI 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90012-4

[83] Vande Kopple, William J. (2002) Metadiscourse, discourse and issues in composition and rhetoric. In: Barton, Ellen and Stygall, Gail (eds.) Discourse Studies in Composition. New Jersey: Hampton Press, 91–113.

[84] Varttala, Teppo (1999) Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes 18 (2), 177–200. | DOI 10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00007-6