Název: Better learning through argumentation : editorial
Zdrojový dokument: Studia paedagogica. 2019, roč. 24, č. 4, s. [5]-10
Rozsah
[5]-10
-
ISSN1803-7437 (print)2336-4521 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/142237
Type: Editorial; Ediční poznámka
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Reference
[1] Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164–187. | DOI 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
[2] Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting Argumentation Through Students' Questions: Case Studies in Science Classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 230–284. | DOI 10.1080/10508400903530036
[3] Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. | DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
[4] Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., ... Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: Advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45.
[5] Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[6] Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents' thinking. Psychological Science, 22, 545–552. | DOI 10.1177/0956797611402512
[7] Kuhn, D., Wang, Y., & Li, H. (2011). Why Argue? Developing Understanding of the Purposes and Values of Argumentive Discourse. Discourse Processes, 48(1), 26–49.
[8] McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students' views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823.
[9] Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2012). A Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/index.php
[10] Pomerantsev, P. (2014). Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible: The Surreal Heart of the New Russia. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
[11] Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. S. C., & Clarke, S. N. (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
[12] Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. | DOI 10.1002/tea.20009
[2] Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting Argumentation Through Students' Questions: Case Studies in Science Classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 230–284. | DOI 10.1080/10508400903530036
[3] Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. | DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
[4] Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., ... Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: Advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45.
[5] Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[6] Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents' thinking. Psychological Science, 22, 545–552. | DOI 10.1177/0956797611402512
[7] Kuhn, D., Wang, Y., & Li, H. (2011). Why Argue? Developing Understanding of the Purposes and Values of Argumentive Discourse. Discourse Processes, 48(1), 26–49.
[8] McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students' views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823.
[9] Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2012). A Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/index.php
[10] Pomerantsev, P. (2014). Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible: The Surreal Heart of the New Russia. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
[11] Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. S. C., & Clarke, S. N. (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
[12] Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. | DOI 10.1002/tea.20009