Název: The Aristotelian perspective in Otakar Zich's The Aesthetics of Dramatic Art
Zdrojový dokument: Theatralia. 2020, roč. 23, č. 1, s. 30-43
Rozsah
30-43
-
ISSN1803-845X (print)2336-4548 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/TY2020-1-3
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/142547
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
In parallel with the Prague School, Otakar Zich's The Aesthetics of Dramatic Art (1931, 1986) shows notable methodological affinity with Aristotle's treatment of the art of drama, item (1) systematic and analytical approach to theatre; (2) mimetic theory of drama; (3) hylomorphic explanation of the 'actor-figure'; (4) active role of a viewer in forming mental images; (5) analysis of dramatic relations and the whole of fictional action. Proceeding point by point, I look for both similarities to and differences from Aristotle's theory of art and drama, and explore the theoretic presuppositions of Otakar Zich's chef d'oeuvre.
Reference
[1] ARISTOTLE. 1987. Poetics. Transl. by Richard Janko. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1987.
[2] ARISTOTLE. 2014. Nicomachean Ethics. Transl. by C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2014.
[3] ARISTOTLE. 2016. Metaphysics. Transl. by C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2016.
[4] EVANS, J. D. G. 1977. Aristotle's Concept of Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
[5] NOVÁK, Bohumil. 1933. Rozhovor s Otakarem Zichem. Čin IV (1933): 20: 465–469.
[6] OSOLSOBĚ, Ivo. 1986. Zichova filozofie dramatického tvaru. In Otakar Zich. Estetika dramatického umění. Prague: Panorama, 1986: 373–399.
[7] OSOLSOBĚ, Ivo. 2007. Herecká postava – pro a proti [Actor-Figure – For and Against]. In Ivo Osolsobě. Principia parodica. Prague: AMU, 2007: 202–218.
[8] OSOLSOBĚ, Petr. 2003. A Source of Teleological Thinking for the Prague Linguistic Circle. In Marek Nekula (ed.). Prager Strukturalismus. Methodologische Grundlagen. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 2003: 121–133.
[9] ZICH, Otakar. 1931. Estetika dramatického umění [The Aesthetics of Dramatic Art]. 1st ed. Prague: Melantrich, 1931.
[10] ZICH, Otakar. 1986. Estetika dramatického umění: teoretická dramaturgie [The Aesthetics of Dramatic Art: A Theoretical Dramaturgy]. 2nd ed. Prague: Panorama, 1986.
[2] ARISTOTLE. 2014. Nicomachean Ethics. Transl. by C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2014.
[3] ARISTOTLE. 2016. Metaphysics. Transl. by C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2016.
[4] EVANS, J. D. G. 1977. Aristotle's Concept of Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
[5] NOVÁK, Bohumil. 1933. Rozhovor s Otakarem Zichem. Čin IV (1933): 20: 465–469.
[6] OSOLSOBĚ, Ivo. 1986. Zichova filozofie dramatického tvaru. In Otakar Zich. Estetika dramatického umění. Prague: Panorama, 1986: 373–399.
[7] OSOLSOBĚ, Ivo. 2007. Herecká postava – pro a proti [Actor-Figure – For and Against]. In Ivo Osolsobě. Principia parodica. Prague: AMU, 2007: 202–218.
[8] OSOLSOBĚ, Petr. 2003. A Source of Teleological Thinking for the Prague Linguistic Circle. In Marek Nekula (ed.). Prager Strukturalismus. Methodologische Grundlagen. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 2003: 121–133.
[9] ZICH, Otakar. 1931. Estetika dramatického umění [The Aesthetics of Dramatic Art]. 1st ed. Prague: Melantrich, 1931.
[10] ZICH, Otakar. 1986. Estetika dramatického umění: teoretická dramaturgie [The Aesthetics of Dramatic Art: A Theoretical Dramaturgy]. 2nd ed. Prague: Panorama, 1986.