Název: Contrastive topics and foci in Brazilian Portuguese : ordering effects and interpretation
Zdrojový dokument: Linguistica Brunensia. 2020, roč. 68, č. 1, s. 41-59
Rozsah
41-59
-
ISSN1803-7410 (print)2336-4440 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/LB2020-1-4
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/142812
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
This paper discusses the ordering effects of contrastive topics and foci in Brazilian Portuguese. I will show that the distribution of CT and F in BP strikingly parallels that observed for Dutch in Neeleman – Van de Koot (2008): 1) it is possible for a focus to precede a contrastive topic, as long as this configuration respects the canonical word order of the syntactic constituents, and 2) it is impossible for a focus to move across a contrastive topic. I propose to interpret sentences with a contrastive topic using the Topic Abstraction account (Constant 2014), in which a contrastive topic is simply an F-marked phrase in a specific configuration (more precisely, an F phrase that has raised to the CT-λ position). Building on the Topic Abstraction account, I propose a simple additional condition that captures Neeleman – Van de Koot's (2008) generalization for Dutch as well as the BP data: a focus interpretation of the moved F is blocked by the CT-λ, and that's why F>CT is impossible in configurations where one of the Fs has moved.
Note
This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project grant P29180-G23, Unalternative Constraints Crosslinguistically.
Reference
[1] Assmann, Muriel. In preparation. Contrastive topics and foci in Brazilian Portuguese: Ordering effects and interpretation. Doctoral thesis, University of Vienna.
[2] Brunetti, Lisa. 2009. On the semantic and contextual factors that determine topic selection in Italian and Spanish. The Linguistic Review 26(2/3), pp. 261–289.
[3] Büring, Daniel. 1997. The Meaning of Topic and Focus – The 59th Street Bridge Accent. London: Routledge.
[4] Büring, Daniel. 2003. On D-Trees, Beans, and B-Accents. Linguistics & Philosophy 26 (5), pp. 511–545. | DOI 10.1023/A:1025887707652
[5] Büring, Daniel. 2015. A Theory of Second Occurrence Focus. Language as a Cognitive Process/Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(1-2), pp. 73–87.
[6] Büring, Daniel. 2016. (Contrastive) Topic. In: Féry, Caroline – Ishihara Shin, eds. The Handbook of Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–85.
[7] Constant, Noah. 2014. Constrastive Topic: Meanings and Realizations. Doctoral thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
[8] Cruschina, Silvio – Remberger, Eva-Maria. 2017. Focus Fronting. In: Durfter, Andreas – Stark Elisabeth, eds. Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 502–535.
[9] Frascarelli, Mara – Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2007. Types of Topics in German and Italian. In: Schwabe, Kerstin – Winkler, Susanne, eds. On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 87–116.
[10] Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[11] Kato, Mary – Martins, Ana Maria. 2016. European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese: An overview on word order. In: Wetzels, Leo – Menuzzi, Sergio – Costa, João, eds. The handbook of Portuguese linguistics. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 15–40.
[12] Leonetti, Manuel – Escandell-Vidal, Victoria. 2009. Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In: Dufter, Andreas – Jacob, Daniel, eds. Focus and background in Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 155–204.
[13] Menuzzi, Sergio – Roisenberg, Gabriel. 2010. Tópicos Contrastivos e Contraste Temático: Um Estudo do Papel Discursivo da "Articulação Informacional". In: Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos. Campinas, Brazil: IEL/UNICAMP. pp. 233–253.
[14] Mioto, Carlos, 2003. FOCALIZAÇÃO E QUANTIFICAÇÃO. Foco e Pressuposição. Revista Letras 61, pp. 169–189.
[15] Neeleman, Ad – Titov, Elena – Van de Koot, Hans – Vermeulen, Reiko. 2009. A Syntactic Typology of Topic, Focus and Contrast. In: van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen, ed. Alternatives to Cartography. Brussels: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 15–51.
[16] Neeleman, Ad – Van de Koot, Hans. 2008. Dutch Scrambling and the Nature of Discourse Templates. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11(2), pp. 137–189. | DOI 10.1007/s10828-008-9018-0
[17] Neeleman, Ad – Van de Koot, Hans. 2012. Towards a Unified Encoding of Contrast and Scope. In: Neeleman, Ad – Vermeulen, Reiko, eds. The syntax of topic, focus, and contrast. An interface-based approach. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 39–76.
[18] Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In: Haegeman, Lilian, ed. Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. pp. 281–337.
[19] Rooth, Mats. 1992. A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, pp. 75–116. | DOI 10.1007/BF02342617
[20] Wagner, Michael. 2012. Contrastive Topics Decomposed. Semantics and Pragmatics 5(8), pp. 1–54.
[2] Brunetti, Lisa. 2009. On the semantic and contextual factors that determine topic selection in Italian and Spanish. The Linguistic Review 26(2/3), pp. 261–289.
[3] Büring, Daniel. 1997. The Meaning of Topic and Focus – The 59th Street Bridge Accent. London: Routledge.
[4] Büring, Daniel. 2003. On D-Trees, Beans, and B-Accents. Linguistics & Philosophy 26 (5), pp. 511–545. | DOI 10.1023/A:1025887707652
[5] Büring, Daniel. 2015. A Theory of Second Occurrence Focus. Language as a Cognitive Process/Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(1-2), pp. 73–87.
[6] Büring, Daniel. 2016. (Contrastive) Topic. In: Féry, Caroline – Ishihara Shin, eds. The Handbook of Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–85.
[7] Constant, Noah. 2014. Constrastive Topic: Meanings and Realizations. Doctoral thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
[8] Cruschina, Silvio – Remberger, Eva-Maria. 2017. Focus Fronting. In: Durfter, Andreas – Stark Elisabeth, eds. Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 502–535.
[9] Frascarelli, Mara – Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2007. Types of Topics in German and Italian. In: Schwabe, Kerstin – Winkler, Susanne, eds. On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 87–116.
[10] Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[11] Kato, Mary – Martins, Ana Maria. 2016. European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese: An overview on word order. In: Wetzels, Leo – Menuzzi, Sergio – Costa, João, eds. The handbook of Portuguese linguistics. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 15–40.
[12] Leonetti, Manuel – Escandell-Vidal, Victoria. 2009. Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In: Dufter, Andreas – Jacob, Daniel, eds. Focus and background in Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 155–204.
[13] Menuzzi, Sergio – Roisenberg, Gabriel. 2010. Tópicos Contrastivos e Contraste Temático: Um Estudo do Papel Discursivo da "Articulação Informacional". In: Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos. Campinas, Brazil: IEL/UNICAMP. pp. 233–253.
[14] Mioto, Carlos, 2003. FOCALIZAÇÃO E QUANTIFICAÇÃO. Foco e Pressuposição. Revista Letras 61, pp. 169–189.
[15] Neeleman, Ad – Titov, Elena – Van de Koot, Hans – Vermeulen, Reiko. 2009. A Syntactic Typology of Topic, Focus and Contrast. In: van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen, ed. Alternatives to Cartography. Brussels: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 15–51.
[16] Neeleman, Ad – Van de Koot, Hans. 2008. Dutch Scrambling and the Nature of Discourse Templates. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11(2), pp. 137–189. | DOI 10.1007/s10828-008-9018-0
[17] Neeleman, Ad – Van de Koot, Hans. 2012. Towards a Unified Encoding of Contrast and Scope. In: Neeleman, Ad – Vermeulen, Reiko, eds. The syntax of topic, focus, and contrast. An interface-based approach. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 39–76.
[18] Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In: Haegeman, Lilian, ed. Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. pp. 281–337.
[19] Rooth, Mats. 1992. A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, pp. 75–116. | DOI 10.1007/BF02342617
[20] Wagner, Michael. 2012. Contrastive Topics Decomposed. Semantics and Pragmatics 5(8), pp. 1–54.