Název: Etika tvorby informačných produktov v digitálnej revolúcii
Variantní název:
- Ethics of information products development in digital revolution
Zdrojový dokument: ProInflow. 2021, roč. 13, č. 1, s. [64]-86
Rozsah
[64]-86
-
ISSN1804-2406 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2021-1-4
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/143901
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: CC BY 3.0 CZ
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
Účel – Cieľom príspevku je nanovo interpretovať etiku tvorby informačných produktov v digitálnej revolúcii v rámci informačnej etiky. Design/metodológia/prístup – Východiskom sú teoretické analýzy modelov informačného správania človeka v digitálnom prostredí a analýzy prístupov informačnej etiky a tvorby produktov. Zdôrazňuje sa etika tvorby ako sociokultúrne a kolaboratívne praktiky s využitím digitálnych nástrojov. Analyzujú sa etické princípy vedeckého výskumu, etické problémy tvorby informačných produktov v digitálnom prostredí a digitálna informačná etika. Využívajú sa metódy analýzy a modelovania informačného produktu v digitálnom prostredí v kontexte informačnej etiky. Výsledky – Tvorba informačných produktov v digitálnom prostredí je interpretovaná v sociokultúrnom rámci ako špecifická informačná praktika s etickým rozmerom. Vymedzuje sa etika tvorby a etické problémy tvorby produktov v digitálnom prostredí s dôrazom na hodnoty informácií, kolaboráciu, vizualizáciu. Navrhuje sa hodnotová analýza a hodnotovo podmienený a participatívny dizajn informačného produktu. Originalita/hodnota – Predstavuje sa novší konceptuálny model informačného produktu v kontexte digitálnej informačnej etiky s novými zložkami intuície, verifikácie, kolaborácie a kontextového prepájania. Navrhuje sa novší prístup k tvorbe produktov s integráciou etických faktorov a kultivovanie etického povedomia tvorcov a informačných profesionálov.
Purpose – The paper is aimed at a new interpretation of ethics of information products development in digital revolution within information ethics. Design/Methodology/Approach – The starting point is based on theoretical analyses of models of human information behavior in digital environment and analyses of perspectives of main authors of information ethics and development of information products. We emphasize ethics of development of information products as sociocultural and collaborative practices and the role of digital tools. We also mention ethical principles of research and production of information products in digital environment and digital information ethics. We apply methods of analyses and modelling of information products in the digital environment and in the context of information ethics. Results – The production of information products in digital environment is interpreted as a sociocultural information practice with ethical dimension. We determine the ethics of production and ethical problems of products development with the emphasis on values of information, collaboration and visualization. We propose the analysis of values and value-sensitive and participatory design of information products. Originality/Value – We present a new conceptual model of information products in the context of digital information ethics, including new components of intuition, verification, collaboration and context linking. We present proposals for development of information products with the inclusion of ethical factors and cultivation of the ethical awareness of authors and information professionals.
slo
eng
Note
Príspevok bol vypracovaný v rámci riešenia výskumnej úlohy VEGA 1/0360/21.
Reference
[1] BATES, M. J. (1989). The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques for the Online Search Interface. In Online Review. 1989, vol.13, no. 5, 407-424. Dostupné na: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/berrypicking.html
[2] BATES, M. (2016). Many Paths to Theory: The Creative Process in the Information Sciences. In Sonnenwald, D., Theory development in the Information Sciences. Austin: Univ.of Texas, 2016, 21-49.
[3] BECHMANN, A. a ZEVENBERGEN, B. (2019). AI and Machine Learning: Internet Research Ethics Guidelines. In: Internet Research: Ethical research 3.0. Association of Internet researchers. [online]. Franzke et al. 2019. AOIR 2019. Dostupné na: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
[4] CAPURRO, R. (2000). Ethical Challenges of the Information Society in the21st Century. In: The International Information & Library Review. [online], 32, (3), 257-276. [cit. 2020-05-10]. Dostupné na: http://www.capurro.de/db.htm#Informationsethik. ISSN 10572317 | DOI 10.1080/10572317.2000.10762513
[5] CAPURRO, R. (2005). Information Ethics. In: CSI Communications, 2005, 7-10.
[6] CAPURRO, R., (2009). Digital Ethics. In: 2009 Global Forum on Civilization and Peace.Seoul, Dec. 2009. PPT presentation. In: Capurro.de [online]. 2009 [cit. 2020-03-22]. Dostupné na: http://www.capurro.de/korea.html
[7] CAPURRO, R.a Ch.,PINGEL. (2002). Ethical Issues of Online Communication Research. In: Ethics and Information Technology [online]. 2002, 4 (3), 189-194 [cit. 2020-03-22]. Dostupné na: http://www.capurro.de/onres.htm
[8] CASE, D. O. a L. M. Given (2016). Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. 4. vyd. London: Emerald. ISBN 978-1-78560-968-8.
[9] DAVENPORT, T. (2018). The AI Advantage. How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2018. 231 s. ISBN 978-0-262-03917-8.
[10] DÖRK, M., Müller, B. Stange, J.-E., Herseni, J., Dittrich, K. (2020). Co-Designing Visualizations for Information Seeking and Knowledge Management. In: Open Information Science, 2020, 4, 217-235.
[11] ETHICS for Researchers. Facilitating Research Excellence for FP7 (2013). Luxembourg: publication Office of the European Union 2013, 30 pp, ISBN 978-92-79-28854-8. Dostupné na: http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1174577397_ethics_for_researchers.pdf DOI 10.2777/7491. |
[12] EUROPEAN Textbook on Information Ethics. 2010. Brussels, European Commission 2010. Dost. na: Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/research/research-eu. EUR 24452 EN
[13] FÁZIK, J. a Jela Steinerová (2020). Technologies, knowledge and truth: the three dimensions of information literacy of university students in Slovakia, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 77 No. 1, 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2020-0086 | DOI 10.1108/JD-05-2020-0086
[14] FLORIDI, L. (2006). Information Ethics, its Nature and Scope. In SIGCAS Computers and Society, Vol. 36, No. 3, Sept. 2006, 21-36. | DOI 10.1145/1195716.1195719
[15] FLORIDI, L. (2010). Information. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010, 130s.
[16] FLORIDI, L. (ed.), (2010a). The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 325 s.
[17] FLORIDI, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199641321
[18] FLORIDI, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Great Britain: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199606726.
[19] FRANZKE, A.S. et al. (2019). franzke, a. s., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, Ch. and the Association of Internet Researchers., 2019. Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
[20] FRIEDMAN, B. and N. G. Freier (2005). Value Sensitive Design. In: Fisher et al (eds.). Theories of Information Behavior. Medford: Information Today, 2005, 368-272.
[21] FRIEDMAN, B. and Kahn, P.H.. (2003). Human Values, Ethics and Design. In: The human-computer interaction handbook. 2003, 1177-1201.
[22] GORMAN, J. (2000). Our enduring values: librarianship in the 21st century. Chicago: American Library Association
[23] GRODZINSKI, F.S., a M.J. Wolf. (2008). Ethical Interest in Free and Open Sources Software. In Himma, K. Tavani, H., 2008. The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. New Jersey, J. Wiley 2008, 245-271.
[24] HIMMA, K. E. a TAVANI, H. T (Eds.), (2008). The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-471-79959-7.
[25] KELLY,M. a BIELBY, J., (eds). 2016. Information Cultures in the Digital Age: A Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS, 2016. ISBN 978-3-658-14679-5.
[26] KUSÁ, D. (ed.). (2011). Ekológia ľudských kognícií. Bratislava: VEDA 2011. 163 s. ISBN 978-80-224-1222-3.
[27] LATHAM, K.F. a GORICHANAZ, T. (2018). The Basics Revisited: Nontextual approaches to teaching in information studies. In: Education for Information, 34 (2018), 3 – 5. DOI :10.3233/EFI-189001 | DOI 10.3233/EFI-189001
[28] IBEKWE SAN-JUAN, F. (2018.) Combining an Arts-informed and textual approach to teaching information adn communication theories. In. Edcuation for Information, 34 (2018), 39-53. DOI:10.3233/EFI-189005 | DOI 10.3233/EFI-189005
[29] LIMBERG, L., Sundin 0. a S. Talja. (2012). Three theoretical Science perspectives on information literacy. Human IT: Journal for Information Technology Studies as a Human, 11(2), 93-130.
[30] LLOYD, A. (2010). Information Literacy Landscape: Information literacy in education, workplace and everyday contexts. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84334-507-7.
[31] HARTEL, J. and NGUYEN, A.T. (2018). (i)Square Dancing: Visual Analysis in the Classroom and Beyond. In: Education for Information, 34, 2018, 21-37. DOI 10.3233/EFI-189004 | DOI 10.3233/EFI-189004
[32] NICHOLAS, D., Rowlands, I., Williams, Jamali, H.D. (2010). Researchers' e-journal use and information seeking behaviour. In: Journal of Information Science, 36 (4), 2010, 494-516. DOI: 10.1177/0165551510371883 | DOI 10.1177/0165551510371883
[33] NORTON, M. (2010). Introductory Concepts in Information Science. 2nd ed. Medford: Information Today, 2010. 210 p. ISBN 978-1-57387-394-9.
[34] MARKHAM, A., (2019). An "Impact Model" for Ethical Assessment. In franzke, aline shakti, Bechmann, Anja, Zimmer, Michael, Ess, Charles and the Association of Internet Researchers. Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
[35] MASON, R. O, 1986. Four Ethical Issues of the Information Age. MIS Quarterly [online]. Vol. 10, No. 1 (Mar., 1986), 5-12, Dostupné na: DOI: 10.2307/248873 | DOI 10.2307/248873
[36] MINGERS, J. A G. Walsham, 2010. Toward ethical information systems: the contribution of discourse ethics. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 34, No., 4, 833-854. Dostupné na: http://misq.org/ | DOI 10.2307/25750707
[37] OAKLEAF, M. (2010). The Value of Academic Libraries: A comprehensive research Review and Report. Chicago: ALA – ACRL 2010. 182 p. ISBN 978-0-8389-8568-7 http://www.acrl.ala.org/value
[38] OECD (2019). Measuring the Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for the Future, OECD Publishing. DOI 10.1787/9789264311992-en |
[39] OLSSON, H. H., & Bosch, J. (2020). Going digital: Disruption and transformation in software‐intensive embedded ecosystems. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 32(6), 2249.
[40] ORNA, L. P. (2007). Collaboration between library and information science and information design disciplines. On what? Why? Potential benefits? Online. Information Research, 2007, vol. 12, no. 4, paper colis02. htttp://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis02.html
[41] PIMENTEL, David M. (2009). The KO roots of Taylor's Value-Added Model. NASKO, (Eds. Jacob, E., Kwasnik, B.) (2009), 2.1: 58-67. http://www.iskocus.org/nasko2009.php, https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/105598
[42] PLAŠIENKOVÁ, Z. (ed). (2020). Bioetické výzvy a súčasnosť : z pohľadu nových poznatkov a trendov. 2. dopl. vyd. ISBN 978-80-8127-309-4. Bratislava : Stimul, 2020, 230-247.
[43] RUSHO, Y, a D.R. RABAN, (2019). Hands on: Information Experiences as Sources of Values. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71 (6), 671-684. Dostupné na: DOI:https://doi.org/1.1002/asi.24288 | DOI 10.1002/asi.24288
[44] RYAN, M:, STAHL, B.C. (2020). Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: clarifying their content and normative implications. In Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society (2020), vol., No 1.
[45] SARACEVIC, T. and Kantor, P.B. (1997), Studying the value of library and information services. Part 1: establishing a theoretical framework, Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1986–1998), Vol. 48 No. 6, pp. 527-542. | DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<527::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-W
[46] SAVOLAINEN, R. (2008). Everyday information practices. A social phenomenological perspective. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
[47] SCHATZKI, Theodore R. (1996). Social Practices. A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. ISBN 0-521-56022-5. 248 s.
[48] SHILTON, K. (2012). Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design. In: Science, technology and Human Values. 38 (3), 2012,374-397.
[49] SHNEIDERMAN, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., Resnick, M., Myers, B., Candy, L., Edmonds, E., Eisenberg, M., Giaccardi, E., Hewitt, T., Jennings, P., Kules, B., Nakakoji, K., Nunamaker, J., Pausch, R., Selker, T., Sylvan, E., Terry, M., (2006), Creativity Support Tools: Report from a U.S. National Science Foundation Sponsored Workshop. In: International Journal of Human_Computer Interaction. 2006, 20 (2), 61-77.
[50] STAHL, Bernd C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future. An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies. London: Springer 2021. ISBN 978-3-030-69977-2.
[51] STEINEROVÁ, Jela. (1998). Tvorba informačných produktov: nové prístupy informačnej vedy. Bratislava : CVTI, 1998. 130s. ISBN 80-85165-73-2.
[52] STEINEROVÁ, J. (2005). Informačné správanie: pohľady informačnej vedy. Bratislava: CVTISR 2005. 189 s. ISBN 80-85165-90-2.
[53] STEINEROVá, J., GREŠKOVÁ, M., ILAVSKÁ, J: (2010). Informačné stratégie v elektronickom prostredí. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2010. 192 s. ISBN 978-80-223-2848-7.
[54] STEINEROVÁ, Jela et al. (2012). Informačná ekológia akademického informačného prostredia. Bratislava: UK 2012. 96s. + príl. ISBN 978-80-223-3178-4.
[55] STEINEROVÁ, J., LICHNEROVÁ, L., ONDRIŠOVÁ, M. (2012). Pojmové a tematické mapy ako nástroje informačnej ekológie. In: ProInFlow, vol. 4, (2012), No. 2. Dostupné na: http://www.phil.muni.cz/journals/index.php/proinflow/article/view/2012-2-4
[56] Steinerová, Jela (2014). Informačná etika v súvislostiach informačnej ekológie. Knihovna [online]. 2014, roč. 25, č. 1, s. 23-35 [cit. 2020-03-24]. Dostupné na: http://knihovna.nkp.cz/knihovna141/141023.htm ISSN 1801-3252
[57] STEINEROVÁ, J. (2018). Informačné prostredie a vedecká komunikácia: Informačné ekológie. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave. 230 s. ISBN 978-80-223-4445-6.
[58] STEINEROVÁ, J. (2019). The societal impact of information behaviour research on developing models of academic information ecologies. In Information Research, vol. 24, (4), paper colis1905. Dostupné na: //InformationR.net/ir/24-4/colis/colis1905.html
[59] STEINEROVÁ, J. FÁZIK, J. a NOVÁKOVÁ, F. (2020). Prínos fenomenografických výskumov pre informačnú vedu. In: ProInFlow [online]. (2020). Vol.12, No.1. Dostupné na: http://www.phil.muni.cz/journals/index.php/proinflow/article/view/2020-1-2/2102
[60] STEINEROVÁ, Jela. (2020). Etika digitálnych informácií vo svetle sociálnych hodnôt informácií. In: ITLib. Roč. 24, č. 2 (2020), s. 6 -21. ISSN 1335-793X.
[61] STEINEROVÁ, Jela. (2020a). Etické výzvy digitálneho prostredia v informačnom správaní vedcov. In: Plašienková, Z. (ed.). Bioetické výzvy a súčasnosť z pohľadu nových poznatkov a trendov.. Bratislava: STIMUL 2020, 230-247.
[62] STEINEROVÁ, J., A M. Ondrišová (eds.). (2020). Informačná veda. Výkladový slovník. Autori: Jela Steinerová, Jaroslav Šušol, Pavol Rankov, Lucia Lichnerová, Ľudmila Hrdináková, Miriam Ondrišová, Marta Špániová, Katarína Buzová, Andrea Hrčková. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2020. 278 s. ISBN 978-80-223-4866-9.
[63] TAYLOR, R. (1986). Value-added Processes in Information systems. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex Publ., 1986. 257s
[64] TUANA, N., (2007). Conceptualizing Moral Literacy. In: Journal of Educational Administration. 2007, 45 (4), 364-378 Dostupné na: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/uniba/reader.action?docID=10196373 | DOI 10.1108/09578230710762409
[65] YOO, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of Digital Innovation:An Agenda for Information Systems Research. In:Information systems Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2010, 724-735. DOI 10.1287/isre.1100.0322 |
[66] URQUHART, Ch. (2018). Principles and practice in impact assessment for academic libraries. Information and Learning Sciences, Vol. 119 No. 1/2, 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2017-0053 | DOI 10.1108/ILS-06-2017-0053
[67] WILSON, T.D. (2020). Exploring Information Behaviour. An Introduction. Preliminary edition. T.D. Wilson 2020. Accessed March 29, 2021 http://www.informationr.net/ir/bonusbook.html
[68] ZWASS, V. (2010). Ethical Issues in Information Systems. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. 3rd d. New York: Taylor and Francis 2010, 1758-1767.
[2] BATES, M. (2016). Many Paths to Theory: The Creative Process in the Information Sciences. In Sonnenwald, D., Theory development in the Information Sciences. Austin: Univ.of Texas, 2016, 21-49.
[3] BECHMANN, A. a ZEVENBERGEN, B. (2019). AI and Machine Learning: Internet Research Ethics Guidelines. In: Internet Research: Ethical research 3.0. Association of Internet researchers. [online]. Franzke et al. 2019. AOIR 2019. Dostupné na: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
[4] CAPURRO, R. (2000). Ethical Challenges of the Information Society in the21st Century. In: The International Information & Library Review. [online], 32, (3), 257-276. [cit. 2020-05-10]. Dostupné na: http://www.capurro.de/db.htm#Informationsethik. ISSN 10572317 | DOI 10.1080/10572317.2000.10762513
[5] CAPURRO, R. (2005). Information Ethics. In: CSI Communications, 2005, 7-10.
[6] CAPURRO, R., (2009). Digital Ethics. In: 2009 Global Forum on Civilization and Peace.Seoul, Dec. 2009. PPT presentation. In: Capurro.de [online]. 2009 [cit. 2020-03-22]. Dostupné na: http://www.capurro.de/korea.html
[7] CAPURRO, R.a Ch.,PINGEL. (2002). Ethical Issues of Online Communication Research. In: Ethics and Information Technology [online]. 2002, 4 (3), 189-194 [cit. 2020-03-22]. Dostupné na: http://www.capurro.de/onres.htm
[8] CASE, D. O. a L. M. Given (2016). Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. 4. vyd. London: Emerald. ISBN 978-1-78560-968-8.
[9] DAVENPORT, T. (2018). The AI Advantage. How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2018. 231 s. ISBN 978-0-262-03917-8.
[10] DÖRK, M., Müller, B. Stange, J.-E., Herseni, J., Dittrich, K. (2020). Co-Designing Visualizations for Information Seeking and Knowledge Management. In: Open Information Science, 2020, 4, 217-235.
[11] ETHICS for Researchers. Facilitating Research Excellence for FP7 (2013). Luxembourg: publication Office of the European Union 2013, 30 pp, ISBN 978-92-79-28854-8. Dostupné na: http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1174577397_ethics_for_researchers.pdf DOI 10.2777/7491. |
[12] EUROPEAN Textbook on Information Ethics. 2010. Brussels, European Commission 2010. Dost. na: Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/research/research-eu. EUR 24452 EN
[13] FÁZIK, J. a Jela Steinerová (2020). Technologies, knowledge and truth: the three dimensions of information literacy of university students in Slovakia, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 77 No. 1, 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2020-0086 | DOI 10.1108/JD-05-2020-0086
[14] FLORIDI, L. (2006). Information Ethics, its Nature and Scope. In SIGCAS Computers and Society, Vol. 36, No. 3, Sept. 2006, 21-36. | DOI 10.1145/1195716.1195719
[15] FLORIDI, L. (2010). Information. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010, 130s.
[16] FLORIDI, L. (ed.), (2010a). The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 325 s.
[17] FLORIDI, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199641321
[18] FLORIDI, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Great Britain: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199606726.
[19] FRANZKE, A.S. et al. (2019). franzke, a. s., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, Ch. and the Association of Internet Researchers., 2019. Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
[20] FRIEDMAN, B. and N. G. Freier (2005). Value Sensitive Design. In: Fisher et al (eds.). Theories of Information Behavior. Medford: Information Today, 2005, 368-272.
[21] FRIEDMAN, B. and Kahn, P.H.. (2003). Human Values, Ethics and Design. In: The human-computer interaction handbook. 2003, 1177-1201.
[22] GORMAN, J. (2000). Our enduring values: librarianship in the 21st century. Chicago: American Library Association
[23] GRODZINSKI, F.S., a M.J. Wolf. (2008). Ethical Interest in Free and Open Sources Software. In Himma, K. Tavani, H., 2008. The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. New Jersey, J. Wiley 2008, 245-271.
[24] HIMMA, K. E. a TAVANI, H. T (Eds.), (2008). The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-471-79959-7.
[25] KELLY,M. a BIELBY, J., (eds). 2016. Information Cultures in the Digital Age: A Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS, 2016. ISBN 978-3-658-14679-5.
[26] KUSÁ, D. (ed.). (2011). Ekológia ľudských kognícií. Bratislava: VEDA 2011. 163 s. ISBN 978-80-224-1222-3.
[27] LATHAM, K.F. a GORICHANAZ, T. (2018). The Basics Revisited: Nontextual approaches to teaching in information studies. In: Education for Information, 34 (2018), 3 – 5. DOI :10.3233/EFI-189001 | DOI 10.3233/EFI-189001
[28] IBEKWE SAN-JUAN, F. (2018.) Combining an Arts-informed and textual approach to teaching information adn communication theories. In. Edcuation for Information, 34 (2018), 39-53. DOI:10.3233/EFI-189005 | DOI 10.3233/EFI-189005
[29] LIMBERG, L., Sundin 0. a S. Talja. (2012). Three theoretical Science perspectives on information literacy. Human IT: Journal for Information Technology Studies as a Human, 11(2), 93-130.
[30] LLOYD, A. (2010). Information Literacy Landscape: Information literacy in education, workplace and everyday contexts. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84334-507-7.
[31] HARTEL, J. and NGUYEN, A.T. (2018). (i)Square Dancing: Visual Analysis in the Classroom and Beyond. In: Education for Information, 34, 2018, 21-37. DOI 10.3233/EFI-189004 | DOI 10.3233/EFI-189004
[32] NICHOLAS, D., Rowlands, I., Williams, Jamali, H.D. (2010). Researchers' e-journal use and information seeking behaviour. In: Journal of Information Science, 36 (4), 2010, 494-516. DOI: 10.1177/0165551510371883 | DOI 10.1177/0165551510371883
[33] NORTON, M. (2010). Introductory Concepts in Information Science. 2nd ed. Medford: Information Today, 2010. 210 p. ISBN 978-1-57387-394-9.
[34] MARKHAM, A., (2019). An "Impact Model" for Ethical Assessment. In franzke, aline shakti, Bechmann, Anja, Zimmer, Michael, Ess, Charles and the Association of Internet Researchers. Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
[35] MASON, R. O, 1986. Four Ethical Issues of the Information Age. MIS Quarterly [online]. Vol. 10, No. 1 (Mar., 1986), 5-12, Dostupné na: DOI: 10.2307/248873 | DOI 10.2307/248873
[36] MINGERS, J. A G. Walsham, 2010. Toward ethical information systems: the contribution of discourse ethics. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 34, No., 4, 833-854. Dostupné na: http://misq.org/ | DOI 10.2307/25750707
[37] OAKLEAF, M. (2010). The Value of Academic Libraries: A comprehensive research Review and Report. Chicago: ALA – ACRL 2010. 182 p. ISBN 978-0-8389-8568-7 http://www.acrl.ala.org/value
[38] OECD (2019). Measuring the Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for the Future, OECD Publishing. DOI 10.1787/9789264311992-en |
[39] OLSSON, H. H., & Bosch, J. (2020). Going digital: Disruption and transformation in software‐intensive embedded ecosystems. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 32(6), 2249.
[40] ORNA, L. P. (2007). Collaboration between library and information science and information design disciplines. On what? Why? Potential benefits? Online. Information Research, 2007, vol. 12, no. 4, paper colis02. htttp://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis02.html
[41] PIMENTEL, David M. (2009). The KO roots of Taylor's Value-Added Model. NASKO, (Eds. Jacob, E., Kwasnik, B.) (2009), 2.1: 58-67. http://www.iskocus.org/nasko2009.php, https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/105598
[42] PLAŠIENKOVÁ, Z. (ed). (2020). Bioetické výzvy a súčasnosť : z pohľadu nových poznatkov a trendov. 2. dopl. vyd. ISBN 978-80-8127-309-4. Bratislava : Stimul, 2020, 230-247.
[43] RUSHO, Y, a D.R. RABAN, (2019). Hands on: Information Experiences as Sources of Values. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71 (6), 671-684. Dostupné na: DOI:https://doi.org/1.1002/asi.24288 | DOI 10.1002/asi.24288
[44] RYAN, M:, STAHL, B.C. (2020). Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: clarifying their content and normative implications. In Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society (2020), vol., No 1.
[45] SARACEVIC, T. and Kantor, P.B. (1997), Studying the value of library and information services. Part 1: establishing a theoretical framework, Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1986–1998), Vol. 48 No. 6, pp. 527-542. | DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<527::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-W
[46] SAVOLAINEN, R. (2008). Everyday information practices. A social phenomenological perspective. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
[47] SCHATZKI, Theodore R. (1996). Social Practices. A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. ISBN 0-521-56022-5. 248 s.
[48] SHILTON, K. (2012). Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design. In: Science, technology and Human Values. 38 (3), 2012,374-397.
[49] SHNEIDERMAN, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., Resnick, M., Myers, B., Candy, L., Edmonds, E., Eisenberg, M., Giaccardi, E., Hewitt, T., Jennings, P., Kules, B., Nakakoji, K., Nunamaker, J., Pausch, R., Selker, T., Sylvan, E., Terry, M., (2006), Creativity Support Tools: Report from a U.S. National Science Foundation Sponsored Workshop. In: International Journal of Human_Computer Interaction. 2006, 20 (2), 61-77.
[50] STAHL, Bernd C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future. An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies. London: Springer 2021. ISBN 978-3-030-69977-2.
[51] STEINEROVÁ, Jela. (1998). Tvorba informačných produktov: nové prístupy informačnej vedy. Bratislava : CVTI, 1998. 130s. ISBN 80-85165-73-2.
[52] STEINEROVÁ, J. (2005). Informačné správanie: pohľady informačnej vedy. Bratislava: CVTISR 2005. 189 s. ISBN 80-85165-90-2.
[53] STEINEROVá, J., GREŠKOVÁ, M., ILAVSKÁ, J: (2010). Informačné stratégie v elektronickom prostredí. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2010. 192 s. ISBN 978-80-223-2848-7.
[54] STEINEROVÁ, Jela et al. (2012). Informačná ekológia akademického informačného prostredia. Bratislava: UK 2012. 96s. + príl. ISBN 978-80-223-3178-4.
[55] STEINEROVÁ, J., LICHNEROVÁ, L., ONDRIŠOVÁ, M. (2012). Pojmové a tematické mapy ako nástroje informačnej ekológie. In: ProInFlow, vol. 4, (2012), No. 2. Dostupné na: http://www.phil.muni.cz/journals/index.php/proinflow/article/view/2012-2-4
[56] Steinerová, Jela (2014). Informačná etika v súvislostiach informačnej ekológie. Knihovna [online]. 2014, roč. 25, č. 1, s. 23-35 [cit. 2020-03-24]. Dostupné na: http://knihovna.nkp.cz/knihovna141/141023.htm ISSN 1801-3252
[57] STEINEROVÁ, J. (2018). Informačné prostredie a vedecká komunikácia: Informačné ekológie. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave. 230 s. ISBN 978-80-223-4445-6.
[58] STEINEROVÁ, J. (2019). The societal impact of information behaviour research on developing models of academic information ecologies. In Information Research, vol. 24, (4), paper colis1905. Dostupné na: //InformationR.net/ir/24-4/colis/colis1905.html
[59] STEINEROVÁ, J. FÁZIK, J. a NOVÁKOVÁ, F. (2020). Prínos fenomenografických výskumov pre informačnú vedu. In: ProInFlow [online]. (2020). Vol.12, No.1. Dostupné na: http://www.phil.muni.cz/journals/index.php/proinflow/article/view/2020-1-2/2102
[60] STEINEROVÁ, Jela. (2020). Etika digitálnych informácií vo svetle sociálnych hodnôt informácií. In: ITLib. Roč. 24, č. 2 (2020), s. 6 -21. ISSN 1335-793X.
[61] STEINEROVÁ, Jela. (2020a). Etické výzvy digitálneho prostredia v informačnom správaní vedcov. In: Plašienková, Z. (ed.). Bioetické výzvy a súčasnosť z pohľadu nových poznatkov a trendov.. Bratislava: STIMUL 2020, 230-247.
[62] STEINEROVÁ, J., A M. Ondrišová (eds.). (2020). Informačná veda. Výkladový slovník. Autori: Jela Steinerová, Jaroslav Šušol, Pavol Rankov, Lucia Lichnerová, Ľudmila Hrdináková, Miriam Ondrišová, Marta Špániová, Katarína Buzová, Andrea Hrčková. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2020. 278 s. ISBN 978-80-223-4866-9.
[63] TAYLOR, R. (1986). Value-added Processes in Information systems. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex Publ., 1986. 257s
[64] TUANA, N., (2007). Conceptualizing Moral Literacy. In: Journal of Educational Administration. 2007, 45 (4), 364-378 Dostupné na: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/uniba/reader.action?docID=10196373 | DOI 10.1108/09578230710762409
[65] YOO, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of Digital Innovation:An Agenda for Information Systems Research. In:Information systems Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2010, 724-735. DOI 10.1287/isre.1100.0322 |
[66] URQUHART, Ch. (2018). Principles and practice in impact assessment for academic libraries. Information and Learning Sciences, Vol. 119 No. 1/2, 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2017-0053 | DOI 10.1108/ILS-06-2017-0053
[67] WILSON, T.D. (2020). Exploring Information Behaviour. An Introduction. Preliminary edition. T.D. Wilson 2020. Accessed March 29, 2021 http://www.informationr.net/ir/bonusbook.html
[68] ZWASS, V. (2010). Ethical Issues in Information Systems. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. 3rd d. New York: Taylor and Francis 2010, 1758-1767.