Epicurus and the paradox of hedonism

Název: Epicurus and the paradox of hedonism
Zdrojový dokument: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2022, roč. 27, č. 2, s. 73-84
  • ISSN
    1803-7402 (print)
    2336-4424 (online)
Type: Článek
The paradox of hedonism is arguably one of the most powerful anti-hedonist arguments. This argument tells us that, because it is self-defeating and irrational to single-mindedly pursue pleasure, pleasure cannot represent the only thing that directly makes us better off. We intend to show in this paper that some of the main elements in Epicurus' ethical position enable him to avoid the negative conclusion of this paradox. We also argue that central claims of the Cyrenaics' hedonism – specifically that only the experience of present pleasure has intrinsic value, and that we should pursue whatever brings pleasure now – make their ethical position especially vulnerable to this paradox. In conclusion, we argue that the fact that Epicurus can, while the Cyrenaics cannot, cope with the paradox of hedonism clearly represents a favorable characteristic of his ethical position.
  • This paper is based on research funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (Projects FFI2013-41170-P and FFI2017-87034-P), the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER, UE).
[1] Buscicchi, L. (2022). Paradox of Hedonism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy [retrieved 30.10.2022 from https://iep.utm.edu/paradox-of-hedonism/].

[2] Cooper, J. M. (1998). Pleasure and Desire in Epicurus. In Idem, Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory (pp. 485–515). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[3] DeWitt, N. W. (1954). Epicurus and his Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

[4] Dietz, A. (2019). Explaining the paradox of hedonism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 97(3), 497–510.

[5] Dietz, A. (2021). How to use the paradox of hedonism. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 18(4), 387–411.

[6] Gosling, J., & C. Taylor (1982). The Greeks on Pleasure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[7] Irwin, T. H. (1991). Aristippus against happiness. Monist, 74(1), 55–82.

[8] Laertius, D. (1925). Lives of Eminent Philosophers (Vol. 1; transl. by R. D. Hicks; The Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

[9] Lampe, K. (2015). The Birth of Hedonism: The Cyrenaic Philosophers and Pleasure as a Way of Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[10] Martin, M. W. (2008). Paradoxes of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 171–184.

[11] Mill, J. S. (1969). Autobiography (ed J. Stillinger). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

[12] Nikolsky, B. (2001). Epicurus on Pleasure. Phronesis, 46, 440–465.

[13] O'Keefe, T. (2001). Epicurus. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy [retrieved 30.10.2022 from https://iep.utm.edu/epicur/].

[14] O'Keefe, T. (2002). The Cyrenaics on Pleasure, Happiness, and Future-Concern. Phronesis, 47, 395–416.

[15] O'Keefe, T. (2010). Epicureanism. Durham: Acumen Publishing.

[16] Purinton, J. (1993). Epicurus on the Telos. Phronesis, 38, 281–320.

[17] Shafer-Landau, R. (2010). The Fundamentals of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[18] Shriver, A. J. (2014). The Asymmetrical Contributions of Pleasure and Pain to Animal Welfare. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 23, 152–162.

[19] Sidgwick, H. (1907). The Methods of Ethics (7th ed.). London: Macmillan.

[20] Striker, G. (1993). Epicurean Hedonism. In J. Brunschwig, & M. Nussbaum (Eds.), Passions and Perceptions (pp. 3–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[21] Tsouna, V. (2002). Is there an exception to Greek eudaemonism? In M. Canto-Sperber, & P. Pellegrin (Eds.), Le style de la pensee: Recueil de textes en hommage à Jacques Brunschwig (pp. 464–489). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

[22] Tsouna, V. (2004). The Epistemology of the Cyrenaic School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[23] Vlastos, G. (1984). Happiness and virtue in Socrates' moral theory. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 30, 181–213.

[24] Weijers, D. (2012). Hedonism and Happiness in Theory and Practice. Diss., Victoria University of Wellington.

[25] Woolf, R. (2004). What Kind of Hedonist Was Epicurus? Phronesis, 49, 303–322.

[26] Zilioli, U. (2012). The Cyrenaics. Bristol: Acumen Publishing.