Social structure: a history of the concept

Název: Social structure: a history of the concept
Zdrojový dokument: Pro-Fil. 2023, roč. 24, č. 2, s. 18-29
Rozsah
18-29
  • ISSN
    1212-9097 (online)
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Přístupová práva
otevřený přístup
 

Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.

Abstrakt(y)
The concept of social structure, present in social ontology since the 19 th century, has been used in various, not always clearly specified, meanings. The present use of the concept has been decisively influenced by the elaborations in the hands of the so called "new structuralists" of the 1970s: Pierre Bourdieu, Roy Bhaskar and Anthony Giddens. To understand the contemporary developments, it is necessary to be acquainted with its formative influences. In the paper, we compare the approaches of Bha skar and Giddens, especially in the context of their mutual compatibility and the challenges facing anyone wanting to develop their own concept of social structure based on the elaborations of the concept by Bhaskar and Giddens. The most fundamental issues appear to be especially the mode of existence of social structures, the heterogeneous character of different kinds of social structures, and the transition from the ontology of the natural world to that of the social world by Bhaskar.
Note
The work on this paper was supported by the Czech Science Foundation grant No. 21-25233S.
Reference
[1] Archer, M. (1996 [1988]): Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[2] Archer, M. (1995): Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[3] Bhaskar, R. (2008 [1975]): A Realist Theory of Science, London: Verso.

[4] Bhaskar, R. (2015 [1979]): The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, London and New York: Routledge.

[5] Bourdieu, P. (1977 [1972]): Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[6] Bourdieu, P. (1990 [1980]): The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

[7] Comte, A. (1893 [1855]): The Positive Philosophy, Vol. II, transl. and ed. by H. Martineau, London: Kegan Paul.

[8] Durkheim, E. (1982 [1895]): The Rules of Sociological Method, transl. by W. D. Halls, New York: The Free Press.

[9] Elder-Vass, D. (2010): The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency, Cambridge University Press.

[10] Elder-Vass D. (2012): The Reality of Social Construction, Cambridge University Press.

[11] Giddens, A. (1993 [1976]): New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Polity Press.

[12] Giddens, A. (1979): Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.

[13] Giddens, A. (1984): The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

[14] Harré, R. (2002): Rom Harré on social structure and social change: Social reality and themyth of social structure. European Journal of Social Theory5(1), 111–123, DOI 10.1177/13684310222225333.

[15] Lawson, T. (1997): Economics and reality. London: Routledge.

[16] Lawson, T. (2003): Reorienting economics. London: Routledge.

[17] Lawson, T. (2012): Ontology and the study of social reality: emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money. Cambridge journal of economics36(2), 345–385. DOI 10.1093/cje/ber050.

[18] Lawson, T. (2014): A conception of social ontology. In Social Ontology and Modern Economics, Pratten, Stephen (ed.), London: Routledge.

[19] Lawson, T. (2016): Comparing conceptions of social ontology: emergent social entities and/or institutional facts? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour46(4), 359–399. DOI 10.1111/jtsb.12126.

[20] Lawson, T. (2022): Social positioning theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics 46(1), 1–39. DOI 10.1093/cje/beab040.

[21] Lévi-Strauss, C. (1977 [1963]): Structural Anthropology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

[22] Lizardo, O. (2010): Beyond the antinomies of structure: Levi-strauss, Giddens, Bourdieu, and Sewell. Theory and Society, 39, 651-688, DOI 10.1007/s11186-010-9125-1.

[23] Martin, J. L. (2009): Social structures, Princeton University Press.

[24] Menšík, J. (2018): Structuralism in Social Science: Obsolete or Promising? Teorie Vědy/Theory of Science 40(2), 129–132, DOI 10.46938/tv.2018.412.

[25] Nadel, S. F. (1957): The Theory of Social Structure, Glencoe: The Free Press.

[26] Parsons,T. (1966 [1937]): The Structure of Social Action, New York: The Free Press.

[27] Parsons,T. (1970 [1951]): The Social System, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

[28] Porpora, D. V. (1989): Four Concepts of Social Structure, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19(2), pp. 195–211, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00144.x.

[29] de Saussure, F. (2015 [1916]): Course in General Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.

[30] Schatzki, T. R. (1990): Do Social Structures Govern Action? Midwest Studies In Philosophy 15(1), pp. 280–295, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1990.tb00218.x.

[31] Spencer, H. (1897 [1874]): The Principles of Sociology, New York: D. Appleton and company.