Title: Dvě další knihy o jazykovém kontaktu
Source document: Linguistica Brunensia. 2019, vol. 67, iss. 2, pp. 65-67
Extent
65-67
-
ISSN1803-7410 (print)2336-4440 (online)
Persistent identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/LB2019-2-8
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/141965
Type: Review
Language
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International
Reviewed work
Hickey, Raymond, ed. The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics. First published. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. xxvi, 1005 s. Cambridge handbooks in language and linguistics. ISBN 978-1-107-05161-4.
Drinka, Bridget. Language contact in Europe: the periphrastic perfect through history. First published. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. xvii, 487 s. Cambridge approaches to language contact. ISBN 978-0-521-51493-4.
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
References
[1] Brankačkec, Katja. 2014. Distribution und Funktionen von Vergangenheitsformen im älteren Obersorbischen. Eine empirische Untersuchung unter Berücksichtigung der Verhältnisse im Altpolnischen und Alttschechischen. Frankfurt am Main etc.: Peter Lang.
[2] Drinka, Bridget. 2017. Language Contact in Europe: The Periphrastic Perfect through History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Hickey, Raymond, ed. 2017. The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[4] McAnallen, Julia. 2011. The History of Predicative Possession in Slavic: Internal Development vs. Language Contact. Berkeley: University of California (disertace také dostupná z: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/23r8p63b).
[5] Sokolova, Anastasija. 2017. Slavjanskie preterity s istoričeskoj točki zrenija: k istorii form perfekta v russkom jazyke (na materiale služebnych minej na maj XI–XIII vv.). Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
[6] Vykypěl, Bohumil. 2006. Recenze: Björn Wiemer, Markus Giger: Resultativa in den nordslavischen und baltischen Sprachen (München: LINCOM Europa 2005). Acta linguistica Lithuanica 54, 123–129.
[7] Vykypěl, Bohumil. 2016. Perspektiven auf die Geschichte des Tschechischen und die tschechische Geschichte. München: LINCOM Europa.
[2] Drinka, Bridget. 2017. Language Contact in Europe: The Periphrastic Perfect through History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Hickey, Raymond, ed. 2017. The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[4] McAnallen, Julia. 2011. The History of Predicative Possession in Slavic: Internal Development vs. Language Contact. Berkeley: University of California (disertace také dostupná z: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/23r8p63b).
[5] Sokolova, Anastasija. 2017. Slavjanskie preterity s istoričeskoj točki zrenija: k istorii form perfekta v russkom jazyke (na materiale služebnych minej na maj XI–XIII vv.). Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
[6] Vykypěl, Bohumil. 2006. Recenze: Björn Wiemer, Markus Giger: Resultativa in den nordslavischen und baltischen Sprachen (München: LINCOM Europa 2005). Acta linguistica Lithuanica 54, 123–129.
[7] Vykypěl, Bohumil. 2016. Perspektiven auf die Geschichte des Tschechischen und die tschechische Geschichte. München: LINCOM Europa.