On poetic types or on more?

Title: On poetic types or on more?
Author: Fořt, Bohumil
Source document: Theatralia. 2020, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 54-61
Extent
54-61
  • ISSN
    1803-845X (print)
    2336-4548 (online)
Type: Article
Language
 

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

Abstract(s)
Otakar Zich's On Poetic Types (1917–1918) represents not only an early contribution of his to the field of art theory in general and poetics in particular, but it also embodies important evidence documenting the process of the development of the author's theoretical views and interests. As such, the concrete ideas present in the study more or less directly correlate with Zich's later contributions to the fields of theatre and drama studies as well as semiotics and aesthetics. The ideas in On Poetic Types, however, also mirror the wider theoretical and methodological context of a particular period and stage of research. As such, Zich's suggestions can also be compared to ongoing and further developments within his fields of interest.
References
[1] OSOLSOBĚ, Ivo. 1981. Sémiotika Otakara Zicha [Otakar Zich's Semiotics]. In Rudolf Pečman (ed.). Vědecký odkaz Otakara Zicha [Otakar Zich's Scientific Legacy]. Brno: Česká hudební společnost, 1981: 37–52.

[2] STEINER, Peter. 1984. Production versus Reception: The Esthetic Axiologies of Otakar Zich and Jan Mukařovský. In Benjamin A. Stolz, I. R. Titunik and Lubomír Doležel (eds.). Language and Literary Theory: In Honor of Ladislav Matejka. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1984: 527–534.

[3] SUS, Oleg. 1992. Geneze sémantiky hudby a básnictví v moderní české estetice. Dvě studie o Otakaru Zichovi [The Genesis of Musical and Literary Semantics in Modern Czech Aesthetics. Two Studies on Otakar Zich]. Brno: Filozofická fakulta Masarykovy university, 1992.

[4] ZICH, Otakar. 2003 [1918]. O typech básnických [On Poetic Types]. In Jiří Kudrnáč (ed.). Česká literární kritika v dotyku se strukturalismem [Czech Structuralist Literary Criticism]. Brno: Host, 2003: 167–230.