Title: Signifikantní vlastnosti : příspěvek ke kolektivnímu nevědomí
Variant title:
- Significant properties : contribution to collective unknown
Source document: ProInflow. 2020, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. [21]-44
Extent
[21]-44
-
ISSN1804-2406 (online)
Persistent identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2020-2-3
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/143227
Type: Article
Language
License: CC BY 3.0 CZ
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
Abstract(s)
Účel – Článek pojednává o problematice signifikantních vlastností digitálních objektů a stanovuje si za cíl tento koncept aplikovat v rámci Národní digitální knihovny. V textu jsou představeny jak různé přístupy k otázce signifikantních vlastností a jejich určování, tak i jejich různé druhy. Cílem je ale pokusit se určit data-centrické technické vlastnosti zvukových a obrazových souborů v rámci NDK, které je vhodné uchovat a představit návrh jejich zápisu. Zařazením se jedná o výzkumnou studii. -- Design/metodologie/přístup – Metodologicky se jedná o analýzu. Shrnuje rozličné přístupy k signifikantním vlastnostem v mezinárodních institucích a postupy při jejich stanovení. Blíže pojednává o možnostech jejich zápisu do standardu PREMIS a věnuje se také duplicitě informací. V návaznosti na to předkládá výčet technických vlastností, které jsou námi považovány za signifikantní. -- Výsledky – Analýza technických vlastností v rámci standardů NDK a signifikantních vlastností doporučených jinými institucemi umožnila určení signifikantních vlastností pro zvukové a obrazové soubory jednotlivých objektů v rámci NDK. Tento výčet může být v budoucnu použitý jako podklad při případné implementaci signifikantních vlastností do standardů NDK. -- Originalita/hodnota – Přínosem článku je ucelený pohled na problematiku signifikantních vlastností a vytvoření podkladů k dalšímu vývoji standardů NDK. Zmiňuje také další typy signifikantních vlastností, kterým je potřeba se v budoucnu věnovat.
Purpose – This article deals with the matter of significant properties of digital objects and it aims to apply this concept within the NDL. In the text, we present various approaches to the question of significant properties and how to identify them as well as their different kinds. The goal is to try to identify data-centric technical properties of audio and image files within NDL, which need to be preserved and to present a way how to record them. It can be classified as a research study. -- Design/Methodology/Approach – Regarding used methodology, this article is an analysis. It sums up different approaches of international institutions to the significant properties and the ways of identifying them. It deals more closely with possibilities of recording them in PREMIS and it addresses duplicity of information, too. Building on that, it presents a list of technical properties which we consider significant. -- Results – The analysis of the technical properties within NDL standards and the significant properties recommended by other institutions allowed identification of the significant properties for audio and image files for single objects within NDL. This list can be used in the future as a groundwork for potential implementation of significant properties to the NDL standards. -- Originality/Value – The benefit of the article is a comprehensive overview of the matter of significant properties and creation of groundwork for future development of NDL standards. It also mentions other types of significant properties, which need to be addressed in the future.
cze
eng
References
[1] Archives New Zealand. 04_NewZealandNationalLibrary.xml [online]. 2009 [cit. 2020-07-01]. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/registry/examples/04_NewZealandNationalLibrary.xml
[2] Ashley, K., Davis, R. & Pinsent, E. (2008). Significant Properties of E-learning Objects (SPeLOs). Tech. rep. Draft version 0.91. JISC Information Environment Committee. http://pubs.ulcc.ac.uk/54/1/spelos_ report.pdf.
[3] Carlson, S. & Anderson, B. (2007). What are data? The many kinds of data and their implications for data re-use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (2): 635–651. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00342.x. | DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007. 00342.x. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00342.x. |
[4] THE CEDARS PROJECT, Cedars Guide to Digital Collection Management, (2002). University of Leeds. Dostupné také z: https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20050410120000mp_/http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/guideto/collmanagement/guidetocolman.pdf
[5] Corti, L. (2007). "Re-using archived qualitative data: Where, how, why?" Archival Science 7 (1): 37–54. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10502-006-9038-y.pdf | DOI 10. 1007/s10502-006-9038-y. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10502-006-9038-y.pdf |
[6] Coyne, M., Duce, D., Hopgod, B., Mallen, G. & Stapleton M. (2007). The Significant Properties of Vector Images. Tech. rep. Version 4.3. JISC Digital Preservation Programme. https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140613220103/http:/www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/preservation/vector_images.pdf
[7] Coyne, M. & Stapleton, M. (2008). The significant properties of moving images. Tech. rep. JISC Digital Preservation Programme.
[8] Cubr, L. (2017) Autenticita a digitální informace. (Disertační práce). Dostupné z: https://is.cuni.cz/webapps/zzp/detail/105596.
[9] Dappert, A. & Farquhar, A. (2009). "Significance is in the Eye of the Stakeholder". In 13th European Conference, ECDL 2009, Corfu, Greece, September 27-October 2, 2009. Proceedings, ed. by Maristella Agosti et al., 5714:297–308. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. European Conference on Digital Libraries, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. isbn: 978-3-642-04346-8. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-04346-8_29.pdf | DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04346-8. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-04346-8_29.pdf |
[10] De Vos, J. (2015). Domain specific implementation of PREMIS. Prezentace prezentovaná na/v: iPRES 2015 workshop: PREMIS implementation fair – Nov. 6th 2015. Dostupné na WWW: https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/pif/2015/index.html
[11] EX LIBRIS. Rosetta AIP Data Model [online]. Ex Libris Limited, (June 2020). [cit. 2020-07-01]. Dostupné z: https://files.mtstatic.com/site_11811/39700/4?Expires=1593609950&Signature=njx57zG0HvBvcCUaHAQYjKM2B9BiLYA6QQRtYMDE2DDFNQ8C0GU-L9mPUtK0rjUfla5ob93WxZC9H~aVJBaD47xIfAdyihAw8yStcZ2s-67J3vPjNcrjKCAMEt8wD4g2DLcbIBeci2~qHlY2epTlfIH70khXkLERm56Ym3HN8tk_&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJ5Y6AV4GI7A555NA
[12] Faniel, I. M. (2009). "Unrealized Potential: The Socio-Technical Challenges of a Large Scale Cyberinfrastructure Initiative". https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e6f3/23e6106b9c6d89f7419f489be72eb921df10.pdf?_ga=2.155260862.409180184.1571031725-715198704.1570454413
[13] Faniel, I. M., and Jacobsen, T. E. (2010). "Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues' Data". Computer Supported Cooperative Work 19:355–375. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8.pdf | DOI 10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8.pdf |
[14] Faniel, I. M., & Yakel, E. (2011). Significant Properties as Contextual Metadata. Journal of Library Metadata 11:155–165. issn: 1937-5034. DOI 10.1080/19386389.2011.629959 |
[15] German National Library of Science and Technology (TIB). Core Trust Seal: Assessment Information: Repository: TIB Digital Long-Term Archive [online]. (2020). [cit. 2020-07-01]. https://www.coretrustseal.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/TIB-Digital-Long-Term-Archive.pdf
[16] Giaretta, D., Matthews, B., Bicarregui, J., Lambert, S., Guercio, M., Michetti, G., & Sawyer, D. (2009). Significant Properties, Authenticity, Provenance, Representation Information and OAIS Information. UC Office of the President: California Digital Library [online]. 2009-05-10 [cit. 2018-11-14]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0wf3j9cw
[17] Grace, S., Knight, G. & Montague, L. (2009). InSPECT Project Final Report. Tech. rep. Version 1.0. King's College London. https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13131539.
[18] HathiTrust. HathiTrust PREMIS Implementation - Version 2.0 [online]. updated April 20, 2015 [cit. 2020-07-01]. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UTZNIzRfelVixIYJ9nZ12tnieIe6FNZSMi9Fdhh2z5c/edit#heading=h.k2fhyw155gi
[19] Hedstrom, M. L., Lee, C. A., Olson, J.S. & Lampe, C. A., (2006). The Old Version Flickers More: Digital Preservation from the User's Perspective. The American Archivist: 159–187. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.69.1.1765364485n41800 | DOI 10.17723/aarc.69.1.1765364485n41800
[20] Heslop, H., Davis, S. & Wilson, A. (2002). An approach to the preservation of digital records. Tech. rep. National Archives of Australia (NAA). http://www.imaginar.org/taller/dppd/DPPD/40%20pp%20Approach.pdf
[21] Hockx-Yu, H. & Knight, G. (2008). What to Preserve?: Significant Properties of Digital Objects. International Journal of Digital Curation. Bath: University of Bath, 3(1), 141-153. DOI: https://doi-org.ezproxy.muni.cz/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.49 ISSN 1746-8256. | DOI 10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.49
[22] Knight, G. (2008). Significant Properties Testing Report: Audio Recordings [online]. CeRch, [cit. 2019-11-27]. Dostupné z: https://figshare.com/articles/InSPECT_Significant_Properties_Testing_Report_Audio_Recordings/7137818
[23] Knight, G. (2010a). Significant Properties Data Dictionary. Tech. rep. Version 1.1. InSPECT Project. https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13131551.
[24] Knight, G. (2009). InSPECT Framework Report. Londýn. Dostupné také z: http://significantproperties.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/inspect-framework.pdf
[25] Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. isbn: 0674258932.
[26] Konečný, M. (2018). Významné vlastnosti digitálních objektů. Prezentace prezentovaná na/v: Národní technická knihovna na semináři 15. listopadu 2018
[27] Konečný, M. (2019) Významné vlastnosti digitálních objektů a jejich určování. Interní studie pro NK.
[28] Matthews, B., McIlwrath. B., Giaretta D. & Conway, E. (2008). The significant properties of software: A study. Tech. rep. Version 1.0. JISC Digital Preservation Programme. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.456.122&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[29] Montague, L., Brown, A., Knight, G. & Stephen G. (2010). InSPECT Significant Properties Testing Report: Raster Images. InSPECT Project Document. Dostupné také z: https://figshare.com/articles/InSPECT_Significant_Properties_Testing_Report_Raster_Images/7137803
[30] Morrissey, S. (2010). The economy of free and open source software in the preservation of digital artefacts. Library Hi Tech 28 (2). https://www-emerald-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/insight/content/doi/10.1108/07378831011047622/full/pdf?title=the-economy-of-free-and-open-source-software-in-the-preservation-of-digital-artefacts | DOI 10.1108/07378831011047622. https://www-emerald-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/insight/content/doi/10.1108/07378831011047622/full/pdf?title=the-economy-of-free-and-open-source-software-in-the-preservation-of-digital-artefacts |
[31] Lynch, C. (1999). Canonicalization: a fundamental tool to facilitate preservation and management of digital information. D-Lib Magazine, no. 9. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september99/09lynch.html
[32] National Library of Wales. (2008). 11_Wales_NLW_wills.xml [online]. [cit. 2020-07-01]. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/registry/examples/11_Wales_NLW_wills.xml
[33] OCLC/RLG, Working Group on Preservation Metadata. (2002). Preservation Metadata and the OAIS Information Model – A Metadata Framework to Support the Preservation of Digital Objects. Tech. rep. https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/activities/pmwg/pm_framework.pdf
[34] PREMIS Editorial Committee, (2015). PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata: version 3.0. Washington, D.C.: The Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf
[35] Riksarkivet. Premis_45_SNA_2015.xml [online]. 2015? [cit. 2020-07-01]. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/registry/examples/premis_45_SNA_2015.xml
[36] Rothenberg, J. & Bikson, T. (1999). Carrying Authentic, Understandable and Usable Digital Records Through Time. Report to the Dutch National Archives and Ministry of the Interior. Tech. rep. RAND-Europe. https: //www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/rand_europe/RE99/RE99-016/RE99-016.pdf.
[37] Significant characteristics. Archivematica [online]. last modified on 11 February 2020, at 18:33 [cit. 2020-07-01]. https://wiki.archivematica.org/Significant_characteristics
[38] Steeman, M., ed. (2018) Preservation Metadata Dictionary 2.0. Tech. rep. Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision. https://publications.beeldengeluid.nl/pub/61
[39] Thibodeau, K. (2002). Overview of technological approaches to digital preservation and challenges in coming years. In The State of Digital Preservation: An International Perspective, Conference Proceedings, 107:4–31. Council on Library / Information Resources Washington, D.C. isbn: 1-887334-92-0. https://clir.wordpress.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/pub107.pdf.
[40] Van House, N. A. (2002). Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information. Social Epistemology 16 (1): 99–114. https://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/doi/abs/10.1080/02691720210132833 | DOI 10.1080/02691720210132833. https://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/doi/abs/10.1080/02691720210132833 |
[41] Van House, Nancy A., Mark H. Butler, and Lisa R. Schiff. 1998. Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: Sharing environmental planning data sets. In Proceedings of The 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 335–343. http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~vanhouse/cscwdist.pdf.
[42] Vermaaten, S., Lavoie, B. & Caplan, P. (2012). Identifying threats to successful digital preservation: the SPOT model for risk assessment. D-Lib Magazine 18 (9/10). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september12/vermaaten/09vermaaten.html. | DOI 10.1045/september2012-vermaaten. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september12/vermaaten/09vermaaten.html. |
[43] Wilson, A. (2007). Significant Properties Report, InSPECT Work Package 2.2. Tech. rep. Version 2. InSPECT Project. https://figshare.com/articles/InSPECT_Significant_Properties_Report_WP2_2_/7137812.
[44] Zimmerman, A. S. (2008). New knowledge from old data: The role of standards in the sharing and reuse of ecological data. Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (5): 631–652. https://www.researchgate.net/publication239566188_New_Knowledge_from_Old_Data_The_Role_of_Standards_in_the_Sharing_and_Reuse_of_Ecological_Data | DOI 10.1177/0162243907306704. https://www.researchgate.net/publication239566188_New_Knowledge_from_Old_Data_The_Role_of_Standards_in_the_Sharing_and_Reuse_of_Ecological_Data |
[2] Ashley, K., Davis, R. & Pinsent, E. (2008). Significant Properties of E-learning Objects (SPeLOs). Tech. rep. Draft version 0.91. JISC Information Environment Committee. http://pubs.ulcc.ac.uk/54/1/spelos_ report.pdf.
[3] Carlson, S. & Anderson, B. (2007). What are data? The many kinds of data and their implications for data re-use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (2): 635–651. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00342.x. | DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007. 00342.x. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00342.x. |
[4] THE CEDARS PROJECT, Cedars Guide to Digital Collection Management, (2002). University of Leeds. Dostupné také z: https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20050410120000mp_/http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/guideto/collmanagement/guidetocolman.pdf
[5] Corti, L. (2007). "Re-using archived qualitative data: Where, how, why?" Archival Science 7 (1): 37–54. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10502-006-9038-y.pdf | DOI 10. 1007/s10502-006-9038-y. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10502-006-9038-y.pdf |
[6] Coyne, M., Duce, D., Hopgod, B., Mallen, G. & Stapleton M. (2007). The Significant Properties of Vector Images. Tech. rep. Version 4.3. JISC Digital Preservation Programme. https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140613220103/http:/www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/preservation/vector_images.pdf
[7] Coyne, M. & Stapleton, M. (2008). The significant properties of moving images. Tech. rep. JISC Digital Preservation Programme.
[8] Cubr, L. (2017) Autenticita a digitální informace. (Disertační práce). Dostupné z: https://is.cuni.cz/webapps/zzp/detail/105596.
[9] Dappert, A. & Farquhar, A. (2009). "Significance is in the Eye of the Stakeholder". In 13th European Conference, ECDL 2009, Corfu, Greece, September 27-October 2, 2009. Proceedings, ed. by Maristella Agosti et al., 5714:297–308. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. European Conference on Digital Libraries, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. isbn: 978-3-642-04346-8. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-04346-8_29.pdf | DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04346-8. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-04346-8_29.pdf |
[10] De Vos, J. (2015). Domain specific implementation of PREMIS. Prezentace prezentovaná na/v: iPRES 2015 workshop: PREMIS implementation fair – Nov. 6th 2015. Dostupné na WWW: https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/pif/2015/index.html
[11] EX LIBRIS. Rosetta AIP Data Model [online]. Ex Libris Limited, (June 2020). [cit. 2020-07-01]. Dostupné z: https://files.mtstatic.com/site_11811/39700/4?Expires=1593609950&Signature=njx57zG0HvBvcCUaHAQYjKM2B9BiLYA6QQRtYMDE2DDFNQ8C0GU-L9mPUtK0rjUfla5ob93WxZC9H~aVJBaD47xIfAdyihAw8yStcZ2s-67J3vPjNcrjKCAMEt8wD4g2DLcbIBeci2~qHlY2epTlfIH70khXkLERm56Ym3HN8tk_&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJ5Y6AV4GI7A555NA
[12] Faniel, I. M. (2009). "Unrealized Potential: The Socio-Technical Challenges of a Large Scale Cyberinfrastructure Initiative". https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e6f3/23e6106b9c6d89f7419f489be72eb921df10.pdf?_ga=2.155260862.409180184.1571031725-715198704.1570454413
[13] Faniel, I. M., and Jacobsen, T. E. (2010). "Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues' Data". Computer Supported Cooperative Work 19:355–375. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8.pdf | DOI 10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/content/pdf/10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8.pdf |
[14] Faniel, I. M., & Yakel, E. (2011). Significant Properties as Contextual Metadata. Journal of Library Metadata 11:155–165. issn: 1937-5034. DOI 10.1080/19386389.2011.629959 |
[15] German National Library of Science and Technology (TIB). Core Trust Seal: Assessment Information: Repository: TIB Digital Long-Term Archive [online]. (2020). [cit. 2020-07-01]. https://www.coretrustseal.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/TIB-Digital-Long-Term-Archive.pdf
[16] Giaretta, D., Matthews, B., Bicarregui, J., Lambert, S., Guercio, M., Michetti, G., & Sawyer, D. (2009). Significant Properties, Authenticity, Provenance, Representation Information and OAIS Information. UC Office of the President: California Digital Library [online]. 2009-05-10 [cit. 2018-11-14]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0wf3j9cw
[17] Grace, S., Knight, G. & Montague, L. (2009). InSPECT Project Final Report. Tech. rep. Version 1.0. King's College London. https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13131539.
[18] HathiTrust. HathiTrust PREMIS Implementation - Version 2.0 [online]. updated April 20, 2015 [cit. 2020-07-01]. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UTZNIzRfelVixIYJ9nZ12tnieIe6FNZSMi9Fdhh2z5c/edit#heading=h.k2fhyw155gi
[19] Hedstrom, M. L., Lee, C. A., Olson, J.S. & Lampe, C. A., (2006). The Old Version Flickers More: Digital Preservation from the User's Perspective. The American Archivist: 159–187. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.69.1.1765364485n41800 | DOI 10.17723/aarc.69.1.1765364485n41800
[20] Heslop, H., Davis, S. & Wilson, A. (2002). An approach to the preservation of digital records. Tech. rep. National Archives of Australia (NAA). http://www.imaginar.org/taller/dppd/DPPD/40%20pp%20Approach.pdf
[21] Hockx-Yu, H. & Knight, G. (2008). What to Preserve?: Significant Properties of Digital Objects. International Journal of Digital Curation. Bath: University of Bath, 3(1), 141-153. DOI: https://doi-org.ezproxy.muni.cz/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.49 ISSN 1746-8256. | DOI 10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.49
[22] Knight, G. (2008). Significant Properties Testing Report: Audio Recordings [online]. CeRch, [cit. 2019-11-27]. Dostupné z: https://figshare.com/articles/InSPECT_Significant_Properties_Testing_Report_Audio_Recordings/7137818
[23] Knight, G. (2010a). Significant Properties Data Dictionary. Tech. rep. Version 1.1. InSPECT Project. https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13131551.
[24] Knight, G. (2009). InSPECT Framework Report. Londýn. Dostupné také z: http://significantproperties.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/inspect-framework.pdf
[25] Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. isbn: 0674258932.
[26] Konečný, M. (2018). Významné vlastnosti digitálních objektů. Prezentace prezentovaná na/v: Národní technická knihovna na semináři 15. listopadu 2018
[27] Konečný, M. (2019) Významné vlastnosti digitálních objektů a jejich určování. Interní studie pro NK.
[28] Matthews, B., McIlwrath. B., Giaretta D. & Conway, E. (2008). The significant properties of software: A study. Tech. rep. Version 1.0. JISC Digital Preservation Programme. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.456.122&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[29] Montague, L., Brown, A., Knight, G. & Stephen G. (2010). InSPECT Significant Properties Testing Report: Raster Images. InSPECT Project Document. Dostupné také z: https://figshare.com/articles/InSPECT_Significant_Properties_Testing_Report_Raster_Images/7137803
[30] Morrissey, S. (2010). The economy of free and open source software in the preservation of digital artefacts. Library Hi Tech 28 (2). https://www-emerald-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/insight/content/doi/10.1108/07378831011047622/full/pdf?title=the-economy-of-free-and-open-source-software-in-the-preservation-of-digital-artefacts | DOI 10.1108/07378831011047622. https://www-emerald-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/insight/content/doi/10.1108/07378831011047622/full/pdf?title=the-economy-of-free-and-open-source-software-in-the-preservation-of-digital-artefacts |
[31] Lynch, C. (1999). Canonicalization: a fundamental tool to facilitate preservation and management of digital information. D-Lib Magazine, no. 9. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september99/09lynch.html
[32] National Library of Wales. (2008). 11_Wales_NLW_wills.xml [online]. [cit. 2020-07-01]. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/registry/examples/11_Wales_NLW_wills.xml
[33] OCLC/RLG, Working Group on Preservation Metadata. (2002). Preservation Metadata and the OAIS Information Model – A Metadata Framework to Support the Preservation of Digital Objects. Tech. rep. https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/activities/pmwg/pm_framework.pdf
[34] PREMIS Editorial Committee, (2015). PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata: version 3.0. Washington, D.C.: The Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf
[35] Riksarkivet. Premis_45_SNA_2015.xml [online]. 2015? [cit. 2020-07-01]. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/registry/examples/premis_45_SNA_2015.xml
[36] Rothenberg, J. & Bikson, T. (1999). Carrying Authentic, Understandable and Usable Digital Records Through Time. Report to the Dutch National Archives and Ministry of the Interior. Tech. rep. RAND-Europe. https: //www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/rand_europe/RE99/RE99-016/RE99-016.pdf.
[37] Significant characteristics. Archivematica [online]. last modified on 11 February 2020, at 18:33 [cit. 2020-07-01]. https://wiki.archivematica.org/Significant_characteristics
[38] Steeman, M., ed. (2018) Preservation Metadata Dictionary 2.0. Tech. rep. Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision. https://publications.beeldengeluid.nl/pub/61
[39] Thibodeau, K. (2002). Overview of technological approaches to digital preservation and challenges in coming years. In The State of Digital Preservation: An International Perspective, Conference Proceedings, 107:4–31. Council on Library / Information Resources Washington, D.C. isbn: 1-887334-92-0. https://clir.wordpress.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/pub107.pdf.
[40] Van House, N. A. (2002). Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information. Social Epistemology 16 (1): 99–114. https://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/doi/abs/10.1080/02691720210132833 | DOI 10.1080/02691720210132833. https://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.muni.cz/doi/abs/10.1080/02691720210132833 |
[41] Van House, Nancy A., Mark H. Butler, and Lisa R. Schiff. 1998. Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: Sharing environmental planning data sets. In Proceedings of The 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 335–343. http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~vanhouse/cscwdist.pdf.
[42] Vermaaten, S., Lavoie, B. & Caplan, P. (2012). Identifying threats to successful digital preservation: the SPOT model for risk assessment. D-Lib Magazine 18 (9/10). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september12/vermaaten/09vermaaten.html. | DOI 10.1045/september2012-vermaaten. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september12/vermaaten/09vermaaten.html. |
[43] Wilson, A. (2007). Significant Properties Report, InSPECT Work Package 2.2. Tech. rep. Version 2. InSPECT Project. https://figshare.com/articles/InSPECT_Significant_Properties_Report_WP2_2_/7137812.
[44] Zimmerman, A. S. (2008). New knowledge from old data: The role of standards in the sharing and reuse of ecological data. Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (5): 631–652. https://www.researchgate.net/publication239566188_New_Knowledge_from_Old_Data_The_Role_of_Standards_in_the_Sharing_and_Reuse_of_Ecological_Data | DOI 10.1177/0162243907306704. https://www.researchgate.net/publication239566188_New_Knowledge_from_Old_Data_The_Role_of_Standards_in_the_Sharing_and_Reuse_of_Ecological_Data |