Název: Debere in complement clauses
Zdrojový dokument: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2012, roč. 17, č. 2, s. [131]-147
Rozsah
[131]-147
-
ISSN1803-7402 (print)2336-4424 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/126024
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Jazyk shrnutí
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
This paper examines the use of the verb debere in imperative complement clauses found in Late Latin texts from the 4th to the 8th centuries, with the aim to offer an account of violation of the restrictions that apply in the instances that are not classical. It is argued that the type of the clauses (ut clauses or accusative + infinitive clauses), is of lesser importance in Late Latin, and that the boundary between imperative and declarative clauses is not always clear in the texts under examination. It is further argued that context plays an important role in the interpretation of the verb debere and the complement clauses. The verb debere can indeed take on various meanings; it can express intention, polite request, appeal to take an action, exhortation, and appropriateness. Therefore, it cannot be conceived of as a meaningless element used only to reinforce subjunctive. Apart from the arguments raised in relation to the texts under discussion, a case in Cicero's work, where a modal verb is used in an imperative clause, is analysed.
eng
Reference
[1] Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1976. "The relation between form and meaning of Latin subordinate clauses governed by verba dicendi." Mnemosyne, 29, 2–3, 155–175, 268–300. | DOI 10.1163/156852576X00375
[2] Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1980. Problems in the description of modal verbs. Assen.
[3] Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1996. "Reported speech in Latin." In: Janssen, Theo – Wurff, Wim van der [eds.]. Reported speech: forms and functions of the verb. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 121–140.
[4] Bonnet, Max. 1890. Le latin de Grégoire de Tours. Paris. [Reprografischer Nachdruck. Hildesheim, 1968.]
[5] Fruyt, Michèle – Orlandini, Anna. 2003. "L'expression de la modalité et les verbes perfecto-présents en latin." Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, 81, 3, 693–728.
[6] Lakoff, Robin T. 1968. Abstract syntax and Latin complementation. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.
[7] Magni, Elisabetta. 2010. "Mood and Modality." In: Baldi, Philip – Cuzzolin, Pierluigi [eds.]. New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Vol. 2. Constituent Syntax: Adverbial Phrases, Adverbs, Mood, Tense. Berlin, 193–276.
[8] Magni, Elisabetta. 2005. "Modality's semantic maps. An investigation of some Latin modal forms." In: Calboli, Gualtiero [ed.]. Papers on grammar. IX 1. Latina lingua! Proceedings of the twelfth international colloquium on Latin linguistics (Bologna, 9–14 June 2003). Roma, 325–336.
[9] Núñez, Salvador. 1991. Semántica de la modalidad en latín. Granada.
[10] Orlandini, Anna. 1998. "La polysémie du prédicat debeo." In: Bureau, Bruno – Nicolas, Christian [eds.]. Moussyllanea. Mélanges de linguistique et de littérature anciennes offertes a Claude Moussy. Louvain, Paris, 253–264.
[11] Panchón, Federico. 2003. "Les cómpletives conjonctives. Les complétives en ut." In: Bodelot, Colette [ed.]. Grammaire fondamentale du latin X. Les propositions complé- tives en latin. Leuven, 335–481.
[12] Sznajder, Lyliane. 1995. "Dico eum ire / dico ut eat. À propos des verbes tantôt constatifs tantôt prescrptifs." In: Longrée, Dominique [ed.]. De usu: études de syntaxe latine offertes en hommage à Marius Lavency. Louvain-la-Neuve, 279–294.
[13] Thesaurus linguae Latinae. [DVD-ROM: col.]. 3. Ausg. Munich, Horsham, ©2004.
[14] The electronic Monumenta Germaniae historica. [CD-ROM 8]. Release 8. Turnhout, 2008.
[15] Krusch, Bruno – Levison, Wilhelmus [eds.]. 1951. Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum I, 1. Editio altera. Hannoverae.
[16] Krusch, Bruno [ed]. 1969. Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum I, 2. Editio nova lucis ope expressa. Hannoverae.
[17] Krusch, Bruno [ed]. 1888–1902. Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum II–IV. Hannoverae, Lipsiae.
[18] Krusch, Bruno – Levison, Wilhelmus [eds.]. 1910–1920. Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum V–VII. Hannoverae, Lipsiae.
[2] Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1980. Problems in the description of modal verbs. Assen.
[3] Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1996. "Reported speech in Latin." In: Janssen, Theo – Wurff, Wim van der [eds.]. Reported speech: forms and functions of the verb. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 121–140.
[4] Bonnet, Max. 1890. Le latin de Grégoire de Tours. Paris. [Reprografischer Nachdruck. Hildesheim, 1968.]
[5] Fruyt, Michèle – Orlandini, Anna. 2003. "L'expression de la modalité et les verbes perfecto-présents en latin." Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, 81, 3, 693–728.
[6] Lakoff, Robin T. 1968. Abstract syntax and Latin complementation. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.
[7] Magni, Elisabetta. 2010. "Mood and Modality." In: Baldi, Philip – Cuzzolin, Pierluigi [eds.]. New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Vol. 2. Constituent Syntax: Adverbial Phrases, Adverbs, Mood, Tense. Berlin, 193–276.
[8] Magni, Elisabetta. 2005. "Modality's semantic maps. An investigation of some Latin modal forms." In: Calboli, Gualtiero [ed.]. Papers on grammar. IX 1. Latina lingua! Proceedings of the twelfth international colloquium on Latin linguistics (Bologna, 9–14 June 2003). Roma, 325–336.
[9] Núñez, Salvador. 1991. Semántica de la modalidad en latín. Granada.
[10] Orlandini, Anna. 1998. "La polysémie du prédicat debeo." In: Bureau, Bruno – Nicolas, Christian [eds.]. Moussyllanea. Mélanges de linguistique et de littérature anciennes offertes a Claude Moussy. Louvain, Paris, 253–264.
[11] Panchón, Federico. 2003. "Les cómpletives conjonctives. Les complétives en ut." In: Bodelot, Colette [ed.]. Grammaire fondamentale du latin X. Les propositions complé- tives en latin. Leuven, 335–481.
[12] Sznajder, Lyliane. 1995. "Dico eum ire / dico ut eat. À propos des verbes tantôt constatifs tantôt prescrptifs." In: Longrée, Dominique [ed.]. De usu: études de syntaxe latine offertes en hommage à Marius Lavency. Louvain-la-Neuve, 279–294.
[13] Thesaurus linguae Latinae. [DVD-ROM: col.]. 3. Ausg. Munich, Horsham, ©2004.
[14] The electronic Monumenta Germaniae historica. [CD-ROM 8]. Release 8. Turnhout, 2008.
[15] Krusch, Bruno – Levison, Wilhelmus [eds.]. 1951. Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum I, 1. Editio altera. Hannoverae.
[16] Krusch, Bruno [ed]. 1969. Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum I, 2. Editio nova lucis ope expressa. Hannoverae.
[17] Krusch, Bruno [ed]. 1888–1902. Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum II–IV. Hannoverae, Lipsiae.
[18] Krusch, Bruno – Levison, Wilhelmus [eds.]. 1910–1920. Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum V–VII. Hannoverae, Lipsiae.