Název: Myšlení, pojmy a věci: Walter Burley o vzniku pojmů a jejich reprezentační funkci
Variantní název:
- Thinking, concepts and things: Walter Burley on the formation of concepts and their representational function
Zdrojový dokument: Pro-Fil. 2017, roč. 18, č. 2, s. 26-39
Rozsah
26-39
-
ISSN1212-9097 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/pf17-2-1705
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/137697
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
Pozdně středověký filosof Walter Burley (cca 1275–1344) chápal myšlení jako určitý druh změny, konkrétně jako trpnost, přičemž každý tzv. akt myšlení má podle něho tři hlavní složky: myslící intelekt, pojem a myšlenou věc. Tato studie si dává za cíl prozkoumat, jak Burley pohlížel ve vztahu k myšlení zejména na poslední dvě z těchto složek. První část se pokusí odpovědět na otázku, jakým způsobem dochází ke vzniku pojmů. Druhá část se zaměří na problematiku intencionality našeho myšlení, tj. na otázku, jakým způsobem je podle Burleyho možné říci, že je naše myšlení o nějaké věci.
Late medieval philosopher Walter Burley (c. 1275–1344) understood thinking as a kind of change, namely passion (as opposed to action). Each so-called act of thinking has three main components, according to Burley: a thinking intellect, a concept and a thing thought about. This study aims to explore how Burley understood the last two of these components in relation to thinking. The first part will try to answer the question of concept formation. The second part will focus on the question of the intentionality of our thinking, i.e. the question of how we can say that our thinking is about something.
Note
Studie vznikla v rámci projektu SGS15/FF/2016-2017 – Realita a skutečnost ve středověku.
Reference
[1] Akvinský, T. (1889): Summa Theologiae, in Corpus Thomisticum [online], [cit. 2017-9-3], dostupné z: < http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/sth0000.html >.
[2] Boh, I. (1994): Walter Burley, in Gracia, J. J. E. (ed.) Individuation in Scholasticism: The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-reformation (1150–1650), State University of New York Press, 347–372.
[3] Burley, W. (1316): Expositio libri De anima, Civitas Vaticana, Bibl. Apost. Vat., MS Vat. Lat. 2151, fols. 1ra–88rb.
[4] Burley, W. (1497): Expositio super Artem Veterem Porphyrii et Aristotelis, Benátky (přetištěno ve Frankfurtu: 1967).
[5] Burley, W. (1955): De puritate artis logicae: Tractatus longior. With a Revisited Edition of the Tractatus Brevior, Boehner, P. (ed.), The Franciscan Institute.
[6] Burley, W. (1966): De sensibus, in Shapiro. H. – Scott. F. (eds.) Mitteilungen des Grabmann-Instituts der Universität München 13, [cit. 2017-8-7], dostupné z: < http://www.staff.uni-giessen.de/gloning/tx/wburl-ds.htm >.
[7] Burley, W. (1970): Tractatus de formis, Scott, J. D. (ed.), Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
[8] Burley, W. (1971): De potentiis animae, in Kitchel, M. J. (ed.) Medieval Studies 54, 88–113.
[9] Burley, W. (1972): Commentarius in librum Perihermeneias Aristotelis (Commentarius medius), in Brown, S. F. (ed.) Franciscan Studies 33, 45–134.
[10] Burley, W. (1997): Quaestiones super tertium De anima, in Synan, E. A. (ed.) Questions on the De anima of Aristotle by magister Adam Burley and dominus Walter Burley, Leiden, 76–156.
[11] Burley, W. (1999): Tractatus de universalibus, Wöhler, H.-U. (ed.), Hirzel S. Verlag.
[12] Burley, W. (2002): Expositio super librum Posteriorum, in von Perger, M. (ed.) Walter Burley Über das Vorwissen des Schlusswissens. Eine provisorische Edition von Prolog und Kap. 1 der Expositio super librorum posteriorum, Traditio 57 (2002), 262–288.
[13] Burley, W. (2003): Quaestiones super Sophisticos Elenchos, in Ebbesen, S. (ed.) Burley on Equivocation in his Companion to a Tractatus Fallaciarum and his Questions on the Elenchi, Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec Et Latin 74 (2003), 158–196.
[14] Burley, W. (2009): Commentarium in Aristotelis De anima. Librum tertium [online], Tonelotto, M. (ed.), [cit. 2017-9-11], Dostupné z: < http://www.mariotonelotto.com/ BURLEY_IT/BURLEY/TH/Txt/EdCri/Fichier/CouvBur.htm >.
[15] Burley, W. (2011): Tractatus super librum Predicamentorum, Conti. A. D. (ed.), [cit. 2017-9-3], dostupné z: < http://www-static.cc.univaq.it/diri/lettere/docenti/conti/Allegati/ WB_praedicamenta.pdf >.
[16] Cesalli, L. (2013): Meaning and Truth, in Conti, A. D. (ed.) A Companion to Walter Burley: Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician, Brill, 87–133.
[17] Conti, A. D. (2013): Knowledge, in Conti, A. D. (ed.) A Companion to Walter Burley: Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician, Brill, 225–245.
[18] Dutilh Novaes, C. (2007): Formalizing Medieval Logical Theories: Suppositio, Consequentiae and Obligationes, Springer.
[19] Feeley, T. (1965): "Spirituality" and sensation, Laval théologique et philosophique 21(2), 191–225. | DOI 10.7202/1020077ar
[20] Holopainen, T. J. (2014): Concepts and Concept Formation in Medieval Philosophy, in Knuuttila, S. – Sihvola, J. (eds.) Sourcebook for the History of Philosophy of Mind, Springer, 263–279.
[21] King, P. (2007): Rethinking Representation in the Middle Ages: A Vade-Mecum to Medieval Theories of Mental Representation, in Lagerlund, H. (ed.) Representation and Objects of Thought in Medieval Philosophy, Ashgate Publishing Limited, 81–100.
[22] Knuuttila, S – Kärkkäinen, P. (2014): Medieval Theories of Internal Senses, in Knuuttila, S., Sihvola, J. (eds.) Sourcebook for the History of Philosophy of Mind, Springer, 131–143.
[23] Kuksewicz, Z. (1981): The problem of Walter Burley's Averroism, in Maierù, A. – Paravicini Bagliani, A. (eds.) Studi sul XIV secolo in memoria di Anneliese Maier, Edizioni Di Storia e Letteratura, 341–377.
[24] Lička, L. (2016): Vnímání, kauzalita a pozornost. Roger Bacon a Petr Olivi, Studia Neoaristotelica 13, 3–38. | DOI 10.5840/studneoar20161338
[25] Meier-Oeser, S. (2014): The intersubjective Sameness of Mental Concepts in Late Scholastic Thought, in Klima G. (ed.) Intentionality, Cognition, and mental representation in Medieval Philosophy, Fordham University Press, 287–322.
[26] Perler, D. (2015): Faculties in Medieval Philosophy, in Perler, D. (ed.) Faculties, Oxford University Press, 97–139.
[27] Pini, G. (2014): Two Models of Thinking: Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus on Occurrent Thoughts, in Klima, G. (ed.) Intentionality, Cognition, and mental representation in Medieval Philosophy, Fordham University Press, 81–103.
[28] Read, S. (2014): Concepts and Meaning in Medieval Philosophy, in Klima G. (ed.) Intentionality, Cognition, and mental representation in Medieval Philosophy, Fordham University Press, 9–28.
[29] Schmidt, R. W. (1966): The Domain of Logic According to Saint Thomas Aquinas, Springer.
[30] Spade, P. V. (2007): Thoughts, Words and things: An Introduction to Late Mediaeval Logic and Semantic Theory [online], [cit. 2017-7-12], dostupné z: < http://pvspade.com/Logic/index.html >.
[31] Spruit, L. (1994): Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge, vol. 1: Classical Roots and Medieval Discussions, Brill.
[32] Tachau, K. H. (1988): Vision and Certitudine in the Age of Ockham: Optics, Epistemology, and the Foundations of Semantics, 1250–1345, Brill.
[33] Tuominen, M. (2014): On Activity and Passivity in Perception: Aristotle, Philoponus, and Pseudo-Simplicius, in Silva, J. F. – Yrjönsuuri, M (eds.) Active Perception in the History of Philosophy: From Plato to Modern Philosophy, Springer, 55–78.
[34] Varga, J. (2016): Propoziční sémantika Waltera Burleyho, Filozofia 71, 474–486.
[35] Wood, R. (1988): Studies on Walter Burley 1968–1988, Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 30, 233–250. | DOI 10.1484/J.BPM.3.388
[2] Boh, I. (1994): Walter Burley, in Gracia, J. J. E. (ed.) Individuation in Scholasticism: The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-reformation (1150–1650), State University of New York Press, 347–372.
[3] Burley, W. (1316): Expositio libri De anima, Civitas Vaticana, Bibl. Apost. Vat., MS Vat. Lat. 2151, fols. 1ra–88rb.
[4] Burley, W. (1497): Expositio super Artem Veterem Porphyrii et Aristotelis, Benátky (přetištěno ve Frankfurtu: 1967).
[5] Burley, W. (1955): De puritate artis logicae: Tractatus longior. With a Revisited Edition of the Tractatus Brevior, Boehner, P. (ed.), The Franciscan Institute.
[6] Burley, W. (1966): De sensibus, in Shapiro. H. – Scott. F. (eds.) Mitteilungen des Grabmann-Instituts der Universität München 13, [cit. 2017-8-7], dostupné z: < http://www.staff.uni-giessen.de/gloning/tx/wburl-ds.htm >.
[7] Burley, W. (1970): Tractatus de formis, Scott, J. D. (ed.), Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
[8] Burley, W. (1971): De potentiis animae, in Kitchel, M. J. (ed.) Medieval Studies 54, 88–113.
[9] Burley, W. (1972): Commentarius in librum Perihermeneias Aristotelis (Commentarius medius), in Brown, S. F. (ed.) Franciscan Studies 33, 45–134.
[10] Burley, W. (1997): Quaestiones super tertium De anima, in Synan, E. A. (ed.) Questions on the De anima of Aristotle by magister Adam Burley and dominus Walter Burley, Leiden, 76–156.
[11] Burley, W. (1999): Tractatus de universalibus, Wöhler, H.-U. (ed.), Hirzel S. Verlag.
[12] Burley, W. (2002): Expositio super librum Posteriorum, in von Perger, M. (ed.) Walter Burley Über das Vorwissen des Schlusswissens. Eine provisorische Edition von Prolog und Kap. 1 der Expositio super librorum posteriorum, Traditio 57 (2002), 262–288.
[13] Burley, W. (2003): Quaestiones super Sophisticos Elenchos, in Ebbesen, S. (ed.) Burley on Equivocation in his Companion to a Tractatus Fallaciarum and his Questions on the Elenchi, Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec Et Latin 74 (2003), 158–196.
[14] Burley, W. (2009): Commentarium in Aristotelis De anima. Librum tertium [online], Tonelotto, M. (ed.), [cit. 2017-9-11], Dostupné z: < http://www.mariotonelotto.com/ BURLEY_IT/BURLEY/TH/Txt/EdCri/Fichier/CouvBur.htm >.
[15] Burley, W. (2011): Tractatus super librum Predicamentorum, Conti. A. D. (ed.), [cit. 2017-9-3], dostupné z: < http://www-static.cc.univaq.it/diri/lettere/docenti/conti/Allegati/ WB_praedicamenta.pdf >.
[16] Cesalli, L. (2013): Meaning and Truth, in Conti, A. D. (ed.) A Companion to Walter Burley: Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician, Brill, 87–133.
[17] Conti, A. D. (2013): Knowledge, in Conti, A. D. (ed.) A Companion to Walter Burley: Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician, Brill, 225–245.
[18] Dutilh Novaes, C. (2007): Formalizing Medieval Logical Theories: Suppositio, Consequentiae and Obligationes, Springer.
[19] Feeley, T. (1965): "Spirituality" and sensation, Laval théologique et philosophique 21(2), 191–225. | DOI 10.7202/1020077ar
[20] Holopainen, T. J. (2014): Concepts and Concept Formation in Medieval Philosophy, in Knuuttila, S. – Sihvola, J. (eds.) Sourcebook for the History of Philosophy of Mind, Springer, 263–279.
[21] King, P. (2007): Rethinking Representation in the Middle Ages: A Vade-Mecum to Medieval Theories of Mental Representation, in Lagerlund, H. (ed.) Representation and Objects of Thought in Medieval Philosophy, Ashgate Publishing Limited, 81–100.
[22] Knuuttila, S – Kärkkäinen, P. (2014): Medieval Theories of Internal Senses, in Knuuttila, S., Sihvola, J. (eds.) Sourcebook for the History of Philosophy of Mind, Springer, 131–143.
[23] Kuksewicz, Z. (1981): The problem of Walter Burley's Averroism, in Maierù, A. – Paravicini Bagliani, A. (eds.) Studi sul XIV secolo in memoria di Anneliese Maier, Edizioni Di Storia e Letteratura, 341–377.
[24] Lička, L. (2016): Vnímání, kauzalita a pozornost. Roger Bacon a Petr Olivi, Studia Neoaristotelica 13, 3–38. | DOI 10.5840/studneoar20161338
[25] Meier-Oeser, S. (2014): The intersubjective Sameness of Mental Concepts in Late Scholastic Thought, in Klima G. (ed.) Intentionality, Cognition, and mental representation in Medieval Philosophy, Fordham University Press, 287–322.
[26] Perler, D. (2015): Faculties in Medieval Philosophy, in Perler, D. (ed.) Faculties, Oxford University Press, 97–139.
[27] Pini, G. (2014): Two Models of Thinking: Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus on Occurrent Thoughts, in Klima, G. (ed.) Intentionality, Cognition, and mental representation in Medieval Philosophy, Fordham University Press, 81–103.
[28] Read, S. (2014): Concepts and Meaning in Medieval Philosophy, in Klima G. (ed.) Intentionality, Cognition, and mental representation in Medieval Philosophy, Fordham University Press, 9–28.
[29] Schmidt, R. W. (1966): The Domain of Logic According to Saint Thomas Aquinas, Springer.
[30] Spade, P. V. (2007): Thoughts, Words and things: An Introduction to Late Mediaeval Logic and Semantic Theory [online], [cit. 2017-7-12], dostupné z: < http://pvspade.com/Logic/index.html >.
[31] Spruit, L. (1994): Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge, vol. 1: Classical Roots and Medieval Discussions, Brill.
[32] Tachau, K. H. (1988): Vision and Certitudine in the Age of Ockham: Optics, Epistemology, and the Foundations of Semantics, 1250–1345, Brill.
[33] Tuominen, M. (2014): On Activity and Passivity in Perception: Aristotle, Philoponus, and Pseudo-Simplicius, in Silva, J. F. – Yrjönsuuri, M (eds.) Active Perception in the History of Philosophy: From Plato to Modern Philosophy, Springer, 55–78.
[34] Varga, J. (2016): Propoziční sémantika Waltera Burleyho, Filozofia 71, 474–486.
[35] Wood, R. (1988): Studies on Walter Burley 1968–1988, Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 30, 233–250. | DOI 10.1484/J.BPM.3.388