Název: Vzdělávací politika Ruské federace v oblasti dějepisné výuky a sovětské období v ruských učebnicích dějepisu po roce 2000
Variantní název:
- Educational policy of the Russian Federation in the field of history teaching and the soviet period in Russian history textbooks after 2000
- Obrazovatel'naja politika Rossijskoj Federacii v sfere prepodavanija istorii i sovetskij period v rossijskich učebnikach istorii posle 2000 goda
-
- Образовательная политика Российской Федерации в сфере преподавания истории и советский период в российских учебниках истории после 2000 года
- Obrazovatel'naja politika Rossijskoj Federacii v sfere prepodavanija istorii i sovetskij period v rossijskich učebnikach istorii posle 2000 goda
-
Zdrojový dokument: Новая русистика. 2023, roč. 16, č. 1, s. 31-43
Rozsah
31-43
-
ISSN1803-4950 (print)2336-4564 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/NR2023-1-3
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/digilib.78251
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
The aim of this study is to describe the basic tendencies manifested in the educational policy of the Russian Federation in the field of history education between 2000 and 2013. The issue is approached through the analysis of the periodical Uchitel'skaya gazeta and official statements of the Russian government and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The study assumes two basic tendencies: the unification of the field of textbooks depicting the history of the Soviet period and the attempt to promote a patriotic interpretation of history. Both of these tendencies aim to change the socializing mission of history teaching. The development of these tendencies is examined in relation to developments in the 1990s, and the study highlights the continuation, rejection, or reinterpretation of the efforts of the 1990s.
Целью данного исследования является описание основных тенденций, проявившихся в образовательной политике Российской Федерации в области исторического образования в период с 2000 по 2013 год. Вопрос рассматривается через анализ периодического издания «Учительская газета» и официальных заявлений Правительства России и Президента Владимира Путина. Исследование предполагает две основные тенденции: унификацию поля учебников, изображающих историю советского периода, и попытку продвижения патриотической интерпретации истории. Обе эти тенденции направлены на изменение социализирующей функции преподавания истории. Развитие этих тенденций рассматривается в связи с развитием исследованной проблематики в 1990-х годах, и в исследовании подчеркивается продолжение, отказ или новая интерпретация усилий 1990-х годов.
Note
SVV Hranice identity v propojujícím se světě; Č. j.: UKFF/534545/2022; stipendium na výzkumnou, vývojovou a inovační činnost.
Reference
[1] BRANDENBERGER, D. (2009): A new "Short Course”? A. V. Filippov and the Russian State's Search for a "Usable Past". Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 10, 2009, vol. 4, pp. 825–833. https://www.academia.edu/2444087/_2009_A_New_Short_Course_A_V_Filippov_and_the_Russian_States_Search_for_a_Usable_Past. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2023].
[2] BRANT LARSEN, R. (2017): Competing Historical Narratives in Belarusian Textbooks. In: TÖRNQUIST, PLEWA, B., BERNSAND, N. et al. (eds): In Search of Transcultural Memory in Europe. (CFE Conference Papers Series). Lund, pp. 107–117. https://www.academia.edu/10283381/Competing_historical_narratives_in_Belarusian_Textbooks. [online]. [cit. 03.01.2020].
[3] ČAPKOVSKIJ, F. (2011): Učebnik istorii i ideologičeskij deficit. Pro et Contra 15, 2011, č. 1–2, c. 117–133. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/ProetContra_51_117-133_all.pdf. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2023].
[4] GJERDE, K. L. (2015): The Use of History in Russia 2000–2011: the Kremlin and the Search for Consensus. East European Politics 31, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 149–169. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/21599165.2015.1035779?needAccess=true&role=button. [paywall]. [online]. [cit. 02.04.2022].
[5] GORINOV, M. M., DANILOV, A. A. et al. (2016): Istorija Rossii. 1-ja čast'. 10 klass. Moskva.
[6] DANILOV, A. A., KOSULINA, L. G. et al. (2013): Istorija Rossii XX – načalo XXI veka. 9 klass. Moskva.
[7] KAČUROVSKAJA, A. (2004): Učebniki popali v istoriju. Prezident Putin poručil prezidentu RAN razobrat'sja s nimi do 1 fevralja. Gazeta «Kommersant», 2004, č. 2. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/439713. [online]. [cit. 24.11.2020].
[8] KAPLAN, V. (2005): History Teaching in Post-Soviet Russia. Coping with Antithetical Traditions. In: EKLOF, B., HOLMES, L. E.: Educational Reform in Post-Soviet Russia. Legacies and Prospects. London, pp. 247–271.
[9] KISELEV, A. F., POPOV, V. P. (2012): Istorija Rossii XX – načalo XXI veka. 11 klass. Moskva.
[10] KOPOSOV, N. (2018): Memory Laws, Memory Wars. The Politics of the Past in Europe and Russia. Cambridge, pp. 207–271.
[11] KOSTJUČENKO, I. Ju. (2012): Modernizacija gumanitarnogo obrazovanija v uslovijach perestrojki. Gosudarstvennoje upravlenije. Èlektronnyj vestnik 14, 2012, č. 34, s. 1–26. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modernizatsiya-gumanitarnogo-obrazovaniyav-usloviyah-perestroyki. [online].[cit. 13.01.2023].
[12] LEBEDEV, S. (2004): Panama novejšej istorii. gazeta.ru. https://www.gazeta.ru/comments/2004/06/a_129403.shtml. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2023].
[13] LEISHCHINER, V. R., POLTORAK, D. I. (1994): The Standart for History Education in Russia's Schools. The History Teacher 43, 1994, vol. 2, pp. 317–324. https://www.jstor.org/stable/494772. [paywall]. [online]. [cit. 28.12.2019].
[14] MOSKWA, D. (2018): Russia: An Incessant Battle for Education. Historia i Polityka 31, 2018, vol. 24, pp. 33–46. https://apcz.umk.pl/HiP/article/view/HiP.2018.009/14919.[online]. [cit. 12.12.2020].
[15] OGONOVSKAJA, I. S. (2011): Škol'nyj učebnik otečestvennoj istorii. Učebnyje izdanija kak istoričeskij istočnik. In: OGONOVSKAJA, I. S.: Dokument. Archiv. Istorija.
[16] Sovremennost'. Vyp. 12. Jekaterinburg, s. 264–286. https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/19764/1/dais-18-12-2011.pdf. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2023].
[17] OSTROVSKIJ, V. P., UTKIN, A. I. (1995): Istorija Rossii CHCH vek. 11 klass. Moskva.
[18] Postanovlenije Pravitel'stva RF ot 04.10.2000 g. N 751 «O nacional'noj doktrine obrazovanija v Rossijskoj Federacii». https://ug.ru/iz-krizisa-k-dostojnoj-zhizni-naczionalnayadoktrina-obrazovaniya-v-rossijskoj-federaczii/. [online]. [cit. 23.11.2020].
[19] POTAPOVA, N. (2015): Normativity in Russian History Education: Political Patterns and National History Textbooks. Journal of Social Science Education 14, 2015, vol. 1, pp. 47–55. https://www.jsse.org/index.php/jsse/article/view/734/794. [online]. [cit. 28.12.2020].
[20] Problema jedinogo učebnika istorii v uslovijach raskolotogo obščestva. Naučnyj doklad Centra. https://www.academia.edu/7593386/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B0_%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D1%83%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B2_%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%8F%D1%85_%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9D%D0%B. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2023].
[21] Putin: škol'nyje učebniki – ne ploščadka dlja političeskoj bor'by, s istorii «nado snjat' vsju šeluchu i penu». https://www.newsru.com/russia/27Nov2003/pres.html. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2023].
[22] Rozhovor s Igorem Doluckým. Namerenije ministerstva obrazovanija RF zapretit' izdanije učebnika «Otečestvennaja istorija XX veka»; spory o kačestve učebnoj literatury. Ècho Moskvy. Vysíláno 27.11.2003. https://echo.msk.ru/programs/beseda/24054/, 27.11.2003 (echo.msk.ru). [online]. [cit. 24.11.2020].
[23] Rozhovor s Igorem Duluckým. «Istorija dolžna byt' strastnoj» Ministerstvo zapretilo učebnik otečestvennoj istorii dlja staršeklassnikov. Počemu? Vasilij Kuznecov. Novoje vremja, 2003. https://www.yabloko.ru/Publ/2003/2003_12/031217_novvr_history.html. [online]. [cit. 24.11.2020].
[24] SHERLOCK, T. (2007): Historical Narratives in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia. Destroying the Settled Past, Creating an Uncertain Future. New York.
[25] Stenografičeskij otčet o vstreče s delegatami Vserossijskoj konferencii prepodavatelej gumanitarnych i obščestvennych nauk. http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/24359. [online]. [cit. 30.11.2020].
[26] SVOBODA, K. (2014): Šeď Putinovy historické politiky. Acta universitas Carolinae studia territorialia 1–2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331990294_SED_PUTINOVY_HISTORICKE_POLITIKY. [online]. [cit. 06.12.2020].
[27] ŠESTAKOV, V. A., GORINOV, M. M. et al. (2011): Istorija Rossii XX – načalo XXI veka. 9 klass. Moskva.
[28] ŠOLLE, C. (2021): Pojetí sovětského období v ruských školních učebnicích po roce 2000. Bakalářská práce. Praha.
[29] Učitel'skaja gazeta. Archiv periodika. https://ug.ru/archives/uchitelskaya-gazeta/?y=1995. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2022].
[30] VOLODINA, T. (2005): Teaching History in Russia after the Collapse of the USSR. The History Teacher 38, vol. 2, pp. 179–188. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1555718. [paywall]. [online]. [cit. 02.01.2020].
[31] Vladimir Putin vstretilsja s veteranami Vooružennych Sil Rossii. http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/29770. [online]. [cit. 24.11.2020].
[32] VOLOBUJEV, O. V., KARPAČEV, S. P. et al. (2019): Istorija Rossii. Načalo XX – načalo XXI veka. 10 klass. Moskva.
[33] VJAZEMSKIJ, E. Je. (2013): Obrazovatel'naja politika postsovetskoj Rossii i reforma obščego istoričeskogo obrazovanija. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovanija, 2013, č. 3, c. 5–26. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obrazovatelnaya-politika-postsovetskoyrossii-i-reforma-obschego-istoricheskogo-obrazovaniya. [online]. [cit. 10.12.2020].
[34] ZAGLADIN, N. V., MINAKOV, S. T. et al. (2013): Istorija Rossii XX – načalo XXI veka. 9 klass. Moskva.
[35] Zasedanije Komissii po protivodejstviju popytkam fal'sifikacii istorii v uščerb interesam Rossii. http://kremlin.ru/events/administration/12851. [online]. [cit. 06.12.2020].
[2] BRANT LARSEN, R. (2017): Competing Historical Narratives in Belarusian Textbooks. In: TÖRNQUIST, PLEWA, B., BERNSAND, N. et al. (eds): In Search of Transcultural Memory in Europe. (CFE Conference Papers Series). Lund, pp. 107–117. https://www.academia.edu/10283381/Competing_historical_narratives_in_Belarusian_Textbooks. [online]. [cit. 03.01.2020].
[3] ČAPKOVSKIJ, F. (2011): Učebnik istorii i ideologičeskij deficit. Pro et Contra 15, 2011, č. 1–2, c. 117–133. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/ProetContra_51_117-133_all.pdf. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2023].
[4] GJERDE, K. L. (2015): The Use of History in Russia 2000–2011: the Kremlin and the Search for Consensus. East European Politics 31, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 149–169. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/21599165.2015.1035779?needAccess=true&role=button. [paywall]. [online]. [cit. 02.04.2022].
[5] GORINOV, M. M., DANILOV, A. A. et al. (2016): Istorija Rossii. 1-ja čast'. 10 klass. Moskva.
[6] DANILOV, A. A., KOSULINA, L. G. et al. (2013): Istorija Rossii XX – načalo XXI veka. 9 klass. Moskva.
[7] KAČUROVSKAJA, A. (2004): Učebniki popali v istoriju. Prezident Putin poručil prezidentu RAN razobrat'sja s nimi do 1 fevralja. Gazeta «Kommersant», 2004, č. 2. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/439713. [online]. [cit. 24.11.2020].
[8] KAPLAN, V. (2005): History Teaching in Post-Soviet Russia. Coping with Antithetical Traditions. In: EKLOF, B., HOLMES, L. E.: Educational Reform in Post-Soviet Russia. Legacies and Prospects. London, pp. 247–271.
[9] KISELEV, A. F., POPOV, V. P. (2012): Istorija Rossii XX – načalo XXI veka. 11 klass. Moskva.
[10] KOPOSOV, N. (2018): Memory Laws, Memory Wars. The Politics of the Past in Europe and Russia. Cambridge, pp. 207–271.
[11] KOSTJUČENKO, I. Ju. (2012): Modernizacija gumanitarnogo obrazovanija v uslovijach perestrojki. Gosudarstvennoje upravlenije. Èlektronnyj vestnik 14, 2012, č. 34, s. 1–26. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modernizatsiya-gumanitarnogo-obrazovaniyav-usloviyah-perestroyki. [online].[cit. 13.01.2023].
[12] LEBEDEV, S. (2004): Panama novejšej istorii. gazeta.ru. https://www.gazeta.ru/comments/2004/06/a_129403.shtml. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2023].
[13] LEISHCHINER, V. R., POLTORAK, D. I. (1994): The Standart for History Education in Russia's Schools. The History Teacher 43, 1994, vol. 2, pp. 317–324. https://www.jstor.org/stable/494772. [paywall]. [online]. [cit. 28.12.2019].
[14] MOSKWA, D. (2018): Russia: An Incessant Battle for Education. Historia i Polityka 31, 2018, vol. 24, pp. 33–46. https://apcz.umk.pl/HiP/article/view/HiP.2018.009/14919.[online]. [cit. 12.12.2020].
[15] OGONOVSKAJA, I. S. (2011): Škol'nyj učebnik otečestvennoj istorii. Učebnyje izdanija kak istoričeskij istočnik. In: OGONOVSKAJA, I. S.: Dokument. Archiv. Istorija.
[16] Sovremennost'. Vyp. 12. Jekaterinburg, s. 264–286. https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/19764/1/dais-18-12-2011.pdf. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2023].
[17] OSTROVSKIJ, V. P., UTKIN, A. I. (1995): Istorija Rossii CHCH vek. 11 klass. Moskva.
[18] Postanovlenije Pravitel'stva RF ot 04.10.2000 g. N 751 «O nacional'noj doktrine obrazovanija v Rossijskoj Federacii». https://ug.ru/iz-krizisa-k-dostojnoj-zhizni-naczionalnayadoktrina-obrazovaniya-v-rossijskoj-federaczii/. [online]. [cit. 23.11.2020].
[19] POTAPOVA, N. (2015): Normativity in Russian History Education: Political Patterns and National History Textbooks. Journal of Social Science Education 14, 2015, vol. 1, pp. 47–55. https://www.jsse.org/index.php/jsse/article/view/734/794. [online]. [cit. 28.12.2020].
[20] Problema jedinogo učebnika istorii v uslovijach raskolotogo obščestva. Naučnyj doklad Centra. https://www.academia.edu/7593386/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B0_%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D1%83%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B2_%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%8F%D1%85_%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9D%D0%B. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2023].
[21] Putin: škol'nyje učebniki – ne ploščadka dlja političeskoj bor'by, s istorii «nado snjat' vsju šeluchu i penu». https://www.newsru.com/russia/27Nov2003/pres.html. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2023].
[22] Rozhovor s Igorem Doluckým. Namerenije ministerstva obrazovanija RF zapretit' izdanije učebnika «Otečestvennaja istorija XX veka»; spory o kačestve učebnoj literatury. Ècho Moskvy. Vysíláno 27.11.2003. https://echo.msk.ru/programs/beseda/24054/, 27.11.2003 (echo.msk.ru). [online]. [cit. 24.11.2020].
[23] Rozhovor s Igorem Duluckým. «Istorija dolžna byt' strastnoj» Ministerstvo zapretilo učebnik otečestvennoj istorii dlja staršeklassnikov. Počemu? Vasilij Kuznecov. Novoje vremja, 2003. https://www.yabloko.ru/Publ/2003/2003_12/031217_novvr_history.html. [online]. [cit. 24.11.2020].
[24] SHERLOCK, T. (2007): Historical Narratives in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia. Destroying the Settled Past, Creating an Uncertain Future. New York.
[25] Stenografičeskij otčet o vstreče s delegatami Vserossijskoj konferencii prepodavatelej gumanitarnych i obščestvennych nauk. http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/24359. [online]. [cit. 30.11.2020].
[26] SVOBODA, K. (2014): Šeď Putinovy historické politiky. Acta universitas Carolinae studia territorialia 1–2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331990294_SED_PUTINOVY_HISTORICKE_POLITIKY. [online]. [cit. 06.12.2020].
[27] ŠESTAKOV, V. A., GORINOV, M. M. et al. (2011): Istorija Rossii XX – načalo XXI veka. 9 klass. Moskva.
[28] ŠOLLE, C. (2021): Pojetí sovětského období v ruských školních učebnicích po roce 2000. Bakalářská práce. Praha.
[29] Učitel'skaja gazeta. Archiv periodika. https://ug.ru/archives/uchitelskaya-gazeta/?y=1995. [online]. [cit. 13.01.2022].
[30] VOLODINA, T. (2005): Teaching History in Russia after the Collapse of the USSR. The History Teacher 38, vol. 2, pp. 179–188. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1555718. [paywall]. [online]. [cit. 02.01.2020].
[31] Vladimir Putin vstretilsja s veteranami Vooružennych Sil Rossii. http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/29770. [online]. [cit. 24.11.2020].
[32] VOLOBUJEV, O. V., KARPAČEV, S. P. et al. (2019): Istorija Rossii. Načalo XX – načalo XXI veka. 10 klass. Moskva.
[33] VJAZEMSKIJ, E. Je. (2013): Obrazovatel'naja politika postsovetskoj Rossii i reforma obščego istoričeskogo obrazovanija. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovanija, 2013, č. 3, c. 5–26. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obrazovatelnaya-politika-postsovetskoyrossii-i-reforma-obschego-istoricheskogo-obrazovaniya. [online]. [cit. 10.12.2020].
[34] ZAGLADIN, N. V., MINAKOV, S. T. et al. (2013): Istorija Rossii XX – načalo XXI veka. 9 klass. Moskva.
[35] Zasedanije Komissii po protivodejstviju popytkam fal'sifikacii istorii v uščerb interesam Rossii. http://kremlin.ru/events/administration/12851. [online]. [cit. 06.12.2020].