Title: Methods and modalities of effective school inspections
Source document: Studia paedagogica. 2017, vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. [153]-157
Extent
[153]-157
-
ISSN1803-7437 (print)2336-4521 (online)
Persistent identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2017-2-9
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/136525
Type: Review
Language
License: Not specified license
Reviewed work
Ehren, M. C. M. (Ed.). (2016). Methods and modalities of effective school inspections. London: Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-31001-5 (Print); 978-3-319-31003-9 (Online).
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
External content
References
[1] Ehren, M. C. M., Altrichter, H., McNamara, G., & O'Hara, J. (2013). Impact of school inspections on improvement of schools – describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 25(3), 3–43. | DOI 10.1007/s11092-012-9156-4
[2] Ehren, M. C. M., Perryman, J., & Shackleton, N. (2014). Setting expectations for good education: how Dutch school inspections drive improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(2), 1–32.
[3] Glatterhorn, A. (2008). Principal as curriculum leader shaping what is taught and tested. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
[4] Hopkins, E., Hendry, H., Garrod, F., McClare, S., Pettit, D., Smith, L., Burrell, H., & Temple, J. (2016). Teachers' views of the impact of school evaluation and external inspection processes. Improving Schools, 19(1), 52–61. | DOI 10.1177/1365480215627894
[5] OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning. An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris: OECD, Directorate for Education and Skills.
[6] Penninckx, M., & Vanhoof, J. (2015). Aan welke doelstellingen moeten Vlaamse schooldoorlichtingen voldoen? Exploratieve studie met de Delphi Methode. Pedagogiek, 35(1), 39–63. | DOI 10.5117/PED2015.1.PENNI
[7] Penninckx, M., Vanhoof, J., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2016). Effects and side effects of Flemish school inspection. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(5), 1–17. | DOI 10.1177/1741143215570305
[8] Van Bruggen, J. C. (2010). Inspectorates of education in Europe; some comparative remarks about their tasks and work. Brussels: SICI.
[2] Ehren, M. C. M., Perryman, J., & Shackleton, N. (2014). Setting expectations for good education: how Dutch school inspections drive improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(2), 1–32.
[3] Glatterhorn, A. (2008). Principal as curriculum leader shaping what is taught and tested. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
[4] Hopkins, E., Hendry, H., Garrod, F., McClare, S., Pettit, D., Smith, L., Burrell, H., & Temple, J. (2016). Teachers' views of the impact of school evaluation and external inspection processes. Improving Schools, 19(1), 52–61. | DOI 10.1177/1365480215627894
[5] OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning. An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris: OECD, Directorate for Education and Skills.
[6] Penninckx, M., & Vanhoof, J. (2015). Aan welke doelstellingen moeten Vlaamse schooldoorlichtingen voldoen? Exploratieve studie met de Delphi Methode. Pedagogiek, 35(1), 39–63. | DOI 10.5117/PED2015.1.PENNI
[7] Penninckx, M., Vanhoof, J., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2016). Effects and side effects of Flemish school inspection. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(5), 1–17. | DOI 10.1177/1741143215570305
[8] Van Bruggen, J. C. (2010). Inspectorates of education in Europe; some comparative remarks about their tasks and work. Brussels: SICI.