Název: Czech Republic and Norway on their path to digital education
Zdrojový dokument: Studia paedagogica. 2018, roč. 23, č. 4, s. [11]-48
Rozsah
[11]-48
-
ISSN1803-7437 (print)2336-4521 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2018-4-2
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/138817
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
Digital technologies are a common feature of present society and people's lives. They have made a significant entry into education as well. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) therefore become an important political issue as early as the last decades of the 20th century, when this topic was reflected in the priorities and goals of educational policies. In the present study, the authors focus on the history and transformations of educational policies regarding ICTs in two European countries with distinct geographies, economies, and politics. These countries nevertheless share several features concerning integrating ICTs into education. The authors use a qualitative comparative study of the two countries to approach the two countries as cases, thus enabling relatively detailed insight into the issue, including its contexts. The goals of the study are to describe the cultural, historical, and political context of ICTs implementation in education and explore the development and transformations of Czech and Norwegian educational policies regarding ICTs since their start in the two educational systems. The authors explore the approaches the two countries chose to integrate ICTs into their respective education systems. The study concludes by comparing the states of affairs of implementation of digital technologies in education in four specific areas.
eng
Note
This study is an outcome of the project "Digital technologies in everyday lives and learning of students" (17-06152S) funded by the Czech Science Foundation. The authors are grateful for the support.
Reference
[1] Aasen, P. (2010). Nasjonale retningslinjer for grunnskolelærerutdanningen 5.–10. trinn [National guidelines for education of primary school teachers, Grade 5–10]. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/KD/Rundskriv/2010/Retningslinjer_grunnskolelaererutdanningen_5_10_trinn.pdf
[2] Babbie, E. (1992). The practice of social research. New York: Macmillan.
[3] Balanskat, A. (2009). Study of the impact of technology in primary schools. Brussels: European Commission.
[4] Bereday, G. Z. F. (1964). Comparative method in education. New York: Holt.
[5] Budd, R. W., Thorp, R. K., & Donohew, L. (1967). Content analysis of communications. New York: Macmillan.
[6] Caha, Z. (1986). Elektronizace ve výchově a vzdělávání [Electronization in upbringing and education]. Pedagogika, 36(2), 133–136.
[7] Catanzaro, M. (1988). Using qualitative analytical techniques. In N. F. Woods & M. Catanzaro (Eds.), Nursing research: Theory and practice (pp. 437–456). St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.
[8] Chabbott, C., & Elliot, E. (Eds.). (2001). Understanding others, educating ourselves (Getting more from international comparative studies in education). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/read/10622/chapter/1#iii
[9] Clasen, J. (1999). Introduction. In J. Clasen (Ed.), Comparative social policy: Concepts, theories and methods (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Blackwell.
[10] ČSÚ. (2013). Klasifikace oborů vzdělání (CZ-ISCED-F 2013) [Classification of qualification fields (CZ-ISCED-F 2013)]. Retrieved from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/klasifikaceoboru-vzdelani-cz-isced-f-2013
[11] Commission of the European Communities. (2002). eEurope 2005: Informační společnost pro všechny [eEurope 2005: Information society for all]. Retrieved from https://www.esfcr.cz/documents/21802/761522/Ak%C4%8Dn%C3%AD+pl%C3%A1n+Europe+2005/1d17df9c-fd9a-4114-b30b-2469370c2a94
[12] ČŠI. (2009). Úroveň ICT v základních školách v ČR. Tematická z práva [The level of ICT in primary schools in the Czech Republic. Thematic report]. Retrieved from http://www.csicr.cz/Csicr/media/Prilohy/PDF_el._publikace/Tematick%C3%A9%20zpr%C3% A1vy/2009_uroven_ICT_ZS.pdf
[13] ČŠI. (2015). Mezinárodní šetření ICILS 2013. Silné a slabé stránky českých žáků v testu počítačové a informační gramotnosti [ICILS 2013 international survey. Strengths and weaknesses of Czech students in computer and information literacy test]. Praha.
[14] Dale, E. L., & Øzerk, K. (2009). Underveis analyser av Kunnskapsløftets intensjoner og forutsetninger [Ongoing analysis of goals and intentions of the document Kunnskapsløftet]. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/Upload/Rapporter/2009/5/PFI-delrapport.pdf?epslanguage=no
[15] Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
[16] Erstad, O., & Quale, A. (2009). National policies and practices on ICT in education. In T. Plomp, R. E. Anderson, N. Law, & A. Quale (Eds.), Cross-national information and communication technolog y: Policies and practices in education (pp. 551–568). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
[17] European Agency. (2013). Informační a komunikační technologie pro inkluzi – Pokrok a příležitosti evropských zemí [ICT for inclusion]. Retrieved from https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/ICT_for_Inclusion-CS.pdf
[18] European Commission. (2006). Benchmarking access and use of ICT in European schools 2006. Retrieved from http://www.awt.be/contenu/tel/dem/final_report_3.pdf
[19] European Schoolnet. (2013). Survey of schools: ICT in education. Benchmarking access, use and attitudes to technolog y in Europe's schools. Final Report. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digitalagenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/KK-31-13-401-EN-N.pdf
[20] European Schoolnet. (2015a). Computing our future computer programming and coding priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. Retrieved from http://fcl.eun.org/documents/10180/14689/Computing+our+future_final.pdf/746e36b1-e1a6-4bf1-8105-ea27c0d2bbe0
[21] European Schoolnet. (2015b). Czech Republic. Country report on ICT in education. Retrieved from http://www.eun.org/cs/resources/country-reports
[22] European Schoolnet. (2015c). Norway. Country report on ICT in education. Retrieved from http://www.eun.org/cs/resources/country-reports
[23] Eurydice. (2001). Basic indicators on the incorporation of ICT into European education systems. Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1233cc01-e3d6-4d32-a48d-84c49630cbb6/language-en
[24] Eurydice. (2011). Key data on learning and innovation through ICT at school in Europe 2011. Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice
[25] Fraillon, J., Schulz, W., & Ainley, J. (2013). International Computer and Information Literacy Study: Assessment framework. Retrieved from http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/ICILS_2013_Framework.pdf
[26] Fryč, J. (2008). Didaktické možnosti hypermediálního prostředí ve vzdělávání [Didactic opportunities in hypermedia environments in education] (Postgraduate thesis). Retrieved from https://is.cuni.cz/webapps/zzp/detail/149377/
[27] Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
[28] Hrtoňová, N., Kohout, J., Rohlíková, L., & Zounek, J. (2015). Factors influencing acceptance of e-learning by teachers in the Czech Republic. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, Part B, 873–879.
[29] Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. | DOI 10.1177/1049732305276687
[30] ITU [Network for IT research and competence in education]. (2005). Digital Skole Hver Dag [Everyday digital school]. Retrieved from http://www.itu.no/filearchive/Digital_skole_hver_dag.pdf
[31] ITU [Network for IT research and competence in education]. (2016). Measuring the information society report. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/misr2016/MISR2016-w4.pdf
[32] Krumsvik, R. J. (2011). Digital competence in Norwegian teacher education and schools. Högre utbildning, 1(1), 39–51.
[33] Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2017). Digitaliseringsstrategi for grunnopplæringen 2017–2021 [Digital strategy for basic education 2017–2021]. Oslo.
[34] Lindkvist, K. (1981). Approaches to textual analysis. In K. E. Rosengren (Ed.), Advances in content analysis (pp. 23–41). Beverly Hills: Sage.
[35] Lor, P. J. (2011). International and comparative librarianship. Retrieved from https://pjlor.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/chapter-0-title-page-preface-synopsis.pdf
[36] M85 (Mønsterplanen) [Master plan]. (1985). Oslo: Aschehoug.
[37] M87 (Mønsterplanen) [Master plan]. (1987). Oslo: Aschehoug.
[38] Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20.
[39] McTavish, D. G., & Pirro, E. B. (1990). Contextual content analysis. Quality & Quantity, 24(3), 245–265. | DOI 10.1007/BF00139259
[40] Meglitsch, S. (1985). Flerkulturelle skole-flerkulturelt samfunn. In T. O. Engen (Ed.), Migrasjonspedagogikk (pp. 85–99). Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
[41] Moderniseringsdepartementet. (2009). eNorge 2009 – det digitale spranget [eNorway 2009 – The digital leap]. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/fad/vedlegg/iktpolitikk/enorge_2009_komplett.pdf
[42] Morse, M., & Field, A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
[43] MŠMT. (2000). SIPVZ: Koncepce státní informační politiky ve vzdělávání [The concept of state information policy in education]. Praha.
[44] MŠMT. (2009). Akční plán pro realizaci Koncepce rozvoje informačních a komunikačních technologií ve vzdělávání 2009–2013 [Action plan for implementation of The conception of development of information and communication technologies in education 2009–2013]. Praha.
[45] MŠMT. (2014a). Strategie vzdělávací politiky České republiky do roku 2020 [Strategy for Education Policy of the Czech Republic until 2020]. Retrieved from http://www.vzdelavani2020.cz/images_obsah/dokumenty/strategy_web_en.pdf
[46] MŠMT. (2014b). Strategie digitálního vzdělávání do roku 2020 [Digital Education Strategy until 2020]. Retrieved from http://www.vzdelavani2020.cz/images_obsah/dokumenty/strategie/digistrategie.pdf
[47] MŠMT. (2016a). Průběžné hodnocení implementace Strategie digitálního vzdělávání do roku 2020 [Continuing evaluation of the implementation of the Digital education strategy until 2020]. Retrieved from http://www.msmt.cz/uploads/Implementace_SDV_zprava_za_rok_2016.pdf
[48] MŠMT. (2016b). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání (RVP ZV) [The framework educational programme for basic education]. Praha.
[49] Mudrák, D. (2005). Státní politika rozvoje ICT ve školství ze srovnávacího hlediska [State politics in ICT development in education from a comparative perspective]. Pedagogická orientace, 15(1), 10–26.
[50] Naumann, F. (2009). Dějiny informatiky: Od abaku k internetu [History of information science: From abacus to internet]. Praha: Academia.
[51] Nærings– og handelsdepartementet. (2002). Fra idé til verdi-aksjonsprogrammet [From an idea to a value-oriented action plan]. Oslo.
[52] NIFU (Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning). (2013). IKT i lærerutdanningen På vei mot profesjonsfaglig digital kompetanse? [ICT in teacher education. On the path to professional digital skills]. Retrieved from https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/280429/NIFUrapport2013-20.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
[53] OECD. (2009). Beyond textbooks. Digital learning resources as systemic innovation in the Nordic countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
[54] OECD. (2017). Educational finance indicators. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/data/education-at-a-glance/educational-finance-datasets_c4e1b551-en
[55] Ottestad, G. (2014). Digitale ferdigheter for alle? Norske resultater fra ICILS 2013 [Digital skills for all? Norwegian results from ICILS 2013]. Oslo: Senter for IKT i utdanningen.
[56] Phillips, D. (2006). Comparative education: Method. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1(4), 304–319.
[57] Phillips, D., & Schweisfurth, M. (2008). Comparative and international education: An introduction to theory, method, and practice. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
[58] Plichtová, J. (1996). Obsahová analýza a jej možnosti využitia v psychológii [Content analysis and the possibilities of its use in psychology]. Československá psychologie, 40(4), 304–314.
[59] Punar, T. (2008). ICT ve vzdělávání pod tlakem informační společnosti. Zavádění ICT do vzdělávacích systémů [ICT in education under the pressure of information society] (Master's thesis). Brno: Masarykova univerzita. Retrieved from https://is.muni.cz/th/65575/ff_m/DIPLOMKA_FINAL.doc
[60] Rabušicová, M., & Záleská, K. (2016). Metodologické otázky srovnávací pedagogiky: Podněty pro koncipování komparativních studií [Methodological issues in comparative pedagogy: Tips for conceiving comparative studies]. Pedagogická orientace, 26(3), 346–378. | DOI 10.5817/PedOr2016-3-346
[61] Ragin, Ch. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[62] Røsvik, S. (2014). Introduction of computers in primary schools in Norway. From experiments to implementation. In A. Tatnall & B. Davey (Eds.), Reactions on the history of computers in education: Early use of computers and teaching about computing in schools, AICT-424, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technolog y (pp. 71–82). Springer.
[63] Rys, V. (2004). Teorie a praxe srovnávacích studií v oblasti sociálního zabezpečení [Theory and practice in comparative studies in welfare]. In G. Munková et al., Sociální politika v evropských zemích [Social politics in European countries] (pp. 11–46). Praha: Karolinum.
[64] Sartori, G. (1991). Comparing and miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(3), 243–257. Senter for IKT i utdanningen [The Norwegian Center for Education]. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/om-udir/nytt-direktorat-fra-1.-januar-2018/iktsenteret.no-er-lagt-ned | DOI 10.1177/0951692891003003001
[65] Søby, M. (2013). Synergies for better learning – Where are we now? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(2), 3–11.
[66] St. meld. nr. 14: Informasjonsteknologi i skole og opplæring [Information technologies in school and in the classroom]. (1989). Oslo: Kirke– og undervisningsdepartementet.
[67] St. meld. nr. 20: På rett vei. Kvalitet og mang fold i fellesskolen [Parliamentary report no. 20: On the right path. Quality and variety in unified school]. (2013). Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
[68] St. meld. nr. 24: Om informasjonsteknologi i utdanningen. Rapport fra handlingsprogrammet 1990–93 og strategi for videre arbeid [On information technologies in education. Report to the Action Plan 1990–93 and the Strategy for Further Activities]. (1994). Oslo: Kirke-, utdannings– og forskningsdepartementet.
[69] St. meld. nr. 37: Om datateknologi i skole og opplæring [White Paper no. 37: About computer technology in school and training]. (1988). Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
[70] St. meld. nr. 39: Om datateknologi i skolen [White Paper no. 39: About computer technology in the school]. (1984). Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
[71] Statped. (2017). Årsrapport 2017 for Statped [Annual report 2017 for Statped]. Retrieved from http://www.statped.no/globalassets/omstatped/arsrapporter/2017/statped_aasrapport_2017_til_utdanningsdirektoratet.pdf
[72] Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Bristol: Psychology Press.
[73] Tollingerová, D. (1977). Výpočetní technika ve výchovně vzdělávacím procesu a její výzkum ve státním plánu badatelských prací v 6. pětiletce [Computer technologies in the process of education and upbringing and its research in the national plan for research in the 6th 5-year period]. Pedagogika, 27(2), 219–221.
[74] UNESCO. (2013). UNESCO handbook on education policy analysis and programming. Volume 1. Education policy analysis. Bangkok.
[75] Utdannings– og forskningsdepartementet. (2004). Program for digital kompetanse 2004–2008 [Digital Competence Program]. Oslo.
[76] Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2006). Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet [Curriculum on the basis of reform document Kunnskapsløftet]. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
[77] Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2013). Framework for basic skills. Oslo. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/in-english/Framework-for-Basic-Skills/
[78] Vlček, P. (2015). Srovnávací výzkum v pedagogice – Některé úvahy o metodologii problémového přístupu [Comparative research in educational sciences – Some thoughts on the methodology of the problematic approach]. Pedagogická orientace, 25(3), 394–412. | DOI 10.5817/PedOr2015-3-394
[79] Wu, D., Yu, X., Rao, J., & Yu, L. (2016). Comparative study on the status and strategies of infrastructure construction of ICT in education between China and the United States. In R. Huang, Kinshuk, & J. K. Price (Eds.), ICT in education in global context. Comparative reports of innovations in K-12 education (pp. 95–106). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
[80] Zákon č. 561/2004 Sb., o předškolním, základním, středním, vyšším odborném a jiném vzdělávání: školský zákon [Act no. 561/2004 Sb., on pre-school, primary school, secondary, higher professional and other education: the school act]. (2004). Praha: Tiskárna Ministerstva vnitra.
[81] Zákon č. 563/2004 Sb., o pedagogických pracovnících a o změně některých zákonů [Act no. 563/2004 Sb., on pedagogical staff and amendments to some acts]. (2004). Praha: Tiskárna Ministerstva vnitra.
[82] Zelený, J., & Mannová, B. (2006). Historie výpočetní techniky (1. vyd.) [History of computer science (1st ed.)]. Praha: Scientia.
[83] Zhao, J., Yao, P., & Kong, J. (2016). Comparative study on international policies for teachers' ICT capacity-building. In R. Huang, Kinshuk, & J. K. Price (Eds.), ICT in education in global context. Comparative reports of innovations in K-12 education (pp. 267–292). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
[84] Zounek, J. (2006). ICT v životě základních škol [ICT in lives of primary schools]. Praha: Triton.
[85] Zounek, J., & Šeďová, K. (2009). Učitelé a technologie. Mezi tradičním a moderním pojetím [Teachers and technologies: Between the traditional and the modern approach]. Brno: Paido.
[86] Zounek, J., & Tůma, F. (2014). Problematika ICT ve vzdělávání v českých pedagogických časopisech (1990–2012) [ICT in education in Czech pedagogical journals (1990–2012)]. Studia Paedagogica, 19(3), 65–87.
[2] Babbie, E. (1992). The practice of social research. New York: Macmillan.
[3] Balanskat, A. (2009). Study of the impact of technology in primary schools. Brussels: European Commission.
[4] Bereday, G. Z. F. (1964). Comparative method in education. New York: Holt.
[5] Budd, R. W., Thorp, R. K., & Donohew, L. (1967). Content analysis of communications. New York: Macmillan.
[6] Caha, Z. (1986). Elektronizace ve výchově a vzdělávání [Electronization in upbringing and education]. Pedagogika, 36(2), 133–136.
[7] Catanzaro, M. (1988). Using qualitative analytical techniques. In N. F. Woods & M. Catanzaro (Eds.), Nursing research: Theory and practice (pp. 437–456). St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.
[8] Chabbott, C., & Elliot, E. (Eds.). (2001). Understanding others, educating ourselves (Getting more from international comparative studies in education). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/read/10622/chapter/1#iii
[9] Clasen, J. (1999). Introduction. In J. Clasen (Ed.), Comparative social policy: Concepts, theories and methods (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Blackwell.
[10] ČSÚ. (2013). Klasifikace oborů vzdělání (CZ-ISCED-F 2013) [Classification of qualification fields (CZ-ISCED-F 2013)]. Retrieved from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/klasifikaceoboru-vzdelani-cz-isced-f-2013
[11] Commission of the European Communities. (2002). eEurope 2005: Informační společnost pro všechny [eEurope 2005: Information society for all]. Retrieved from https://www.esfcr.cz/documents/21802/761522/Ak%C4%8Dn%C3%AD+pl%C3%A1n+Europe+2005/1d17df9c-fd9a-4114-b30b-2469370c2a94
[12] ČŠI. (2009). Úroveň ICT v základních školách v ČR. Tematická z práva [The level of ICT in primary schools in the Czech Republic. Thematic report]. Retrieved from http://www.csicr.cz/Csicr/media/Prilohy/PDF_el._publikace/Tematick%C3%A9%20zpr%C3% A1vy/2009_uroven_ICT_ZS.pdf
[13] ČŠI. (2015). Mezinárodní šetření ICILS 2013. Silné a slabé stránky českých žáků v testu počítačové a informační gramotnosti [ICILS 2013 international survey. Strengths and weaknesses of Czech students in computer and information literacy test]. Praha.
[14] Dale, E. L., & Øzerk, K. (2009). Underveis analyser av Kunnskapsløftets intensjoner og forutsetninger [Ongoing analysis of goals and intentions of the document Kunnskapsløftet]. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/Upload/Rapporter/2009/5/PFI-delrapport.pdf?epslanguage=no
[15] Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
[16] Erstad, O., & Quale, A. (2009). National policies and practices on ICT in education. In T. Plomp, R. E. Anderson, N. Law, & A. Quale (Eds.), Cross-national information and communication technolog y: Policies and practices in education (pp. 551–568). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
[17] European Agency. (2013). Informační a komunikační technologie pro inkluzi – Pokrok a příležitosti evropských zemí [ICT for inclusion]. Retrieved from https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/ICT_for_Inclusion-CS.pdf
[18] European Commission. (2006). Benchmarking access and use of ICT in European schools 2006. Retrieved from http://www.awt.be/contenu/tel/dem/final_report_3.pdf
[19] European Schoolnet. (2013). Survey of schools: ICT in education. Benchmarking access, use and attitudes to technolog y in Europe's schools. Final Report. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digitalagenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/KK-31-13-401-EN-N.pdf
[20] European Schoolnet. (2015a). Computing our future computer programming and coding priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. Retrieved from http://fcl.eun.org/documents/10180/14689/Computing+our+future_final.pdf/746e36b1-e1a6-4bf1-8105-ea27c0d2bbe0
[21] European Schoolnet. (2015b). Czech Republic. Country report on ICT in education. Retrieved from http://www.eun.org/cs/resources/country-reports
[22] European Schoolnet. (2015c). Norway. Country report on ICT in education. Retrieved from http://www.eun.org/cs/resources/country-reports
[23] Eurydice. (2001). Basic indicators on the incorporation of ICT into European education systems. Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1233cc01-e3d6-4d32-a48d-84c49630cbb6/language-en
[24] Eurydice. (2011). Key data on learning and innovation through ICT at school in Europe 2011. Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice
[25] Fraillon, J., Schulz, W., & Ainley, J. (2013). International Computer and Information Literacy Study: Assessment framework. Retrieved from http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/ICILS_2013_Framework.pdf
[26] Fryč, J. (2008). Didaktické možnosti hypermediálního prostředí ve vzdělávání [Didactic opportunities in hypermedia environments in education] (Postgraduate thesis). Retrieved from https://is.cuni.cz/webapps/zzp/detail/149377/
[27] Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
[28] Hrtoňová, N., Kohout, J., Rohlíková, L., & Zounek, J. (2015). Factors influencing acceptance of e-learning by teachers in the Czech Republic. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, Part B, 873–879.
[29] Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. | DOI 10.1177/1049732305276687
[30] ITU [Network for IT research and competence in education]. (2005). Digital Skole Hver Dag [Everyday digital school]. Retrieved from http://www.itu.no/filearchive/Digital_skole_hver_dag.pdf
[31] ITU [Network for IT research and competence in education]. (2016). Measuring the information society report. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/misr2016/MISR2016-w4.pdf
[32] Krumsvik, R. J. (2011). Digital competence in Norwegian teacher education and schools. Högre utbildning, 1(1), 39–51.
[33] Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2017). Digitaliseringsstrategi for grunnopplæringen 2017–2021 [Digital strategy for basic education 2017–2021]. Oslo.
[34] Lindkvist, K. (1981). Approaches to textual analysis. In K. E. Rosengren (Ed.), Advances in content analysis (pp. 23–41). Beverly Hills: Sage.
[35] Lor, P. J. (2011). International and comparative librarianship. Retrieved from https://pjlor.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/chapter-0-title-page-preface-synopsis.pdf
[36] M85 (Mønsterplanen) [Master plan]. (1985). Oslo: Aschehoug.
[37] M87 (Mønsterplanen) [Master plan]. (1987). Oslo: Aschehoug.
[38] Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20.
[39] McTavish, D. G., & Pirro, E. B. (1990). Contextual content analysis. Quality & Quantity, 24(3), 245–265. | DOI 10.1007/BF00139259
[40] Meglitsch, S. (1985). Flerkulturelle skole-flerkulturelt samfunn. In T. O. Engen (Ed.), Migrasjonspedagogikk (pp. 85–99). Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
[41] Moderniseringsdepartementet. (2009). eNorge 2009 – det digitale spranget [eNorway 2009 – The digital leap]. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/fad/vedlegg/iktpolitikk/enorge_2009_komplett.pdf
[42] Morse, M., & Field, A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
[43] MŠMT. (2000). SIPVZ: Koncepce státní informační politiky ve vzdělávání [The concept of state information policy in education]. Praha.
[44] MŠMT. (2009). Akční plán pro realizaci Koncepce rozvoje informačních a komunikačních technologií ve vzdělávání 2009–2013 [Action plan for implementation of The conception of development of information and communication technologies in education 2009–2013]. Praha.
[45] MŠMT. (2014a). Strategie vzdělávací politiky České republiky do roku 2020 [Strategy for Education Policy of the Czech Republic until 2020]. Retrieved from http://www.vzdelavani2020.cz/images_obsah/dokumenty/strategy_web_en.pdf
[46] MŠMT. (2014b). Strategie digitálního vzdělávání do roku 2020 [Digital Education Strategy until 2020]. Retrieved from http://www.vzdelavani2020.cz/images_obsah/dokumenty/strategie/digistrategie.pdf
[47] MŠMT. (2016a). Průběžné hodnocení implementace Strategie digitálního vzdělávání do roku 2020 [Continuing evaluation of the implementation of the Digital education strategy until 2020]. Retrieved from http://www.msmt.cz/uploads/Implementace_SDV_zprava_za_rok_2016.pdf
[48] MŠMT. (2016b). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání (RVP ZV) [The framework educational programme for basic education]. Praha.
[49] Mudrák, D. (2005). Státní politika rozvoje ICT ve školství ze srovnávacího hlediska [State politics in ICT development in education from a comparative perspective]. Pedagogická orientace, 15(1), 10–26.
[50] Naumann, F. (2009). Dějiny informatiky: Od abaku k internetu [History of information science: From abacus to internet]. Praha: Academia.
[51] Nærings– og handelsdepartementet. (2002). Fra idé til verdi-aksjonsprogrammet [From an idea to a value-oriented action plan]. Oslo.
[52] NIFU (Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning). (2013). IKT i lærerutdanningen På vei mot profesjonsfaglig digital kompetanse? [ICT in teacher education. On the path to professional digital skills]. Retrieved from https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/280429/NIFUrapport2013-20.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
[53] OECD. (2009). Beyond textbooks. Digital learning resources as systemic innovation in the Nordic countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
[54] OECD. (2017). Educational finance indicators. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/data/education-at-a-glance/educational-finance-datasets_c4e1b551-en
[55] Ottestad, G. (2014). Digitale ferdigheter for alle? Norske resultater fra ICILS 2013 [Digital skills for all? Norwegian results from ICILS 2013]. Oslo: Senter for IKT i utdanningen.
[56] Phillips, D. (2006). Comparative education: Method. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1(4), 304–319.
[57] Phillips, D., & Schweisfurth, M. (2008). Comparative and international education: An introduction to theory, method, and practice. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
[58] Plichtová, J. (1996). Obsahová analýza a jej možnosti využitia v psychológii [Content analysis and the possibilities of its use in psychology]. Československá psychologie, 40(4), 304–314.
[59] Punar, T. (2008). ICT ve vzdělávání pod tlakem informační společnosti. Zavádění ICT do vzdělávacích systémů [ICT in education under the pressure of information society] (Master's thesis). Brno: Masarykova univerzita. Retrieved from https://is.muni.cz/th/65575/ff_m/DIPLOMKA_FINAL.doc
[60] Rabušicová, M., & Záleská, K. (2016). Metodologické otázky srovnávací pedagogiky: Podněty pro koncipování komparativních studií [Methodological issues in comparative pedagogy: Tips for conceiving comparative studies]. Pedagogická orientace, 26(3), 346–378. | DOI 10.5817/PedOr2016-3-346
[61] Ragin, Ch. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[62] Røsvik, S. (2014). Introduction of computers in primary schools in Norway. From experiments to implementation. In A. Tatnall & B. Davey (Eds.), Reactions on the history of computers in education: Early use of computers and teaching about computing in schools, AICT-424, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technolog y (pp. 71–82). Springer.
[63] Rys, V. (2004). Teorie a praxe srovnávacích studií v oblasti sociálního zabezpečení [Theory and practice in comparative studies in welfare]. In G. Munková et al., Sociální politika v evropských zemích [Social politics in European countries] (pp. 11–46). Praha: Karolinum.
[64] Sartori, G. (1991). Comparing and miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(3), 243–257. Senter for IKT i utdanningen [The Norwegian Center for Education]. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/om-udir/nytt-direktorat-fra-1.-januar-2018/iktsenteret.no-er-lagt-ned | DOI 10.1177/0951692891003003001
[65] Søby, M. (2013). Synergies for better learning – Where are we now? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(2), 3–11.
[66] St. meld. nr. 14: Informasjonsteknologi i skole og opplæring [Information technologies in school and in the classroom]. (1989). Oslo: Kirke– og undervisningsdepartementet.
[67] St. meld. nr. 20: På rett vei. Kvalitet og mang fold i fellesskolen [Parliamentary report no. 20: On the right path. Quality and variety in unified school]. (2013). Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
[68] St. meld. nr. 24: Om informasjonsteknologi i utdanningen. Rapport fra handlingsprogrammet 1990–93 og strategi for videre arbeid [On information technologies in education. Report to the Action Plan 1990–93 and the Strategy for Further Activities]. (1994). Oslo: Kirke-, utdannings– og forskningsdepartementet.
[69] St. meld. nr. 37: Om datateknologi i skole og opplæring [White Paper no. 37: About computer technology in school and training]. (1988). Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
[70] St. meld. nr. 39: Om datateknologi i skolen [White Paper no. 39: About computer technology in the school]. (1984). Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
[71] Statped. (2017). Årsrapport 2017 for Statped [Annual report 2017 for Statped]. Retrieved from http://www.statped.no/globalassets/omstatped/arsrapporter/2017/statped_aasrapport_2017_til_utdanningsdirektoratet.pdf
[72] Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Bristol: Psychology Press.
[73] Tollingerová, D. (1977). Výpočetní technika ve výchovně vzdělávacím procesu a její výzkum ve státním plánu badatelských prací v 6. pětiletce [Computer technologies in the process of education and upbringing and its research in the national plan for research in the 6th 5-year period]. Pedagogika, 27(2), 219–221.
[74] UNESCO. (2013). UNESCO handbook on education policy analysis and programming. Volume 1. Education policy analysis. Bangkok.
[75] Utdannings– og forskningsdepartementet. (2004). Program for digital kompetanse 2004–2008 [Digital Competence Program]. Oslo.
[76] Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2006). Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet [Curriculum on the basis of reform document Kunnskapsløftet]. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
[77] Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2013). Framework for basic skills. Oslo. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/in-english/Framework-for-Basic-Skills/
[78] Vlček, P. (2015). Srovnávací výzkum v pedagogice – Některé úvahy o metodologii problémového přístupu [Comparative research in educational sciences – Some thoughts on the methodology of the problematic approach]. Pedagogická orientace, 25(3), 394–412. | DOI 10.5817/PedOr2015-3-394
[79] Wu, D., Yu, X., Rao, J., & Yu, L. (2016). Comparative study on the status and strategies of infrastructure construction of ICT in education between China and the United States. In R. Huang, Kinshuk, & J. K. Price (Eds.), ICT in education in global context. Comparative reports of innovations in K-12 education (pp. 95–106). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
[80] Zákon č. 561/2004 Sb., o předškolním, základním, středním, vyšším odborném a jiném vzdělávání: školský zákon [Act no. 561/2004 Sb., on pre-school, primary school, secondary, higher professional and other education: the school act]. (2004). Praha: Tiskárna Ministerstva vnitra.
[81] Zákon č. 563/2004 Sb., o pedagogických pracovnících a o změně některých zákonů [Act no. 563/2004 Sb., on pedagogical staff and amendments to some acts]. (2004). Praha: Tiskárna Ministerstva vnitra.
[82] Zelený, J., & Mannová, B. (2006). Historie výpočetní techniky (1. vyd.) [History of computer science (1st ed.)]. Praha: Scientia.
[83] Zhao, J., Yao, P., & Kong, J. (2016). Comparative study on international policies for teachers' ICT capacity-building. In R. Huang, Kinshuk, & J. K. Price (Eds.), ICT in education in global context. Comparative reports of innovations in K-12 education (pp. 267–292). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
[84] Zounek, J. (2006). ICT v životě základních škol [ICT in lives of primary schools]. Praha: Triton.
[85] Zounek, J., & Šeďová, K. (2009). Učitelé a technologie. Mezi tradičním a moderním pojetím [Teachers and technologies: Between the traditional and the modern approach]. Brno: Paido.
[86] Zounek, J., & Tůma, F. (2014). Problematika ICT ve vzdělávání v českých pedagogických časopisech (1990–2012) [ICT in education in Czech pedagogical journals (1990–2012)]. Studia Paedagogica, 19(3), 65–87.